通过模型检查UML状态机来检测策略冲突

M. T. Beek, S. Gnesi, C. Montangero, L. Semini
{"title":"通过模型检查UML状态机来检测策略冲突","authors":"M. T. Beek, S. Gnesi, C. Montangero, L. Semini","doi":"10.3233/978-1-60750-014-8-59","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Policies are convenient means to modify system behaviour at run-time. Nowadays, policies are created in great numbers by different actors, ranging from system administrators to lay-users. However, this situation may lead naturally to inconsistencies, a problem that has been recognized and termed policy conflict. The adoption of a widely-used notation, with good tool support, to express the policies, can not only support the detection, but also help all the involved actors in understanding and resolving the conflicts. In this respect, a natural candidate is UML due to its current wide use in the industrial practice. In this paper we show how to model check policies expressed in UML to verify whether they are free of conflicts: we define a correspondence between APPEL policies and UML state machines and use UMC as a model checker. We validate the approach with examples taken from the literature.","PeriodicalId":382411,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Feature Interactions in Software and Communication Systems","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detecting policy conflicts by model checking UML state machines\",\"authors\":\"M. T. Beek, S. Gnesi, C. Montangero, L. Semini\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/978-1-60750-014-8-59\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Policies are convenient means to modify system behaviour at run-time. Nowadays, policies are created in great numbers by different actors, ranging from system administrators to lay-users. However, this situation may lead naturally to inconsistencies, a problem that has been recognized and termed policy conflict. The adoption of a widely-used notation, with good tool support, to express the policies, can not only support the detection, but also help all the involved actors in understanding and resolving the conflicts. In this respect, a natural candidate is UML due to its current wide use in the industrial practice. In this paper we show how to model check policies expressed in UML to verify whether they are free of conflicts: we define a correspondence between APPEL policies and UML state machines and use UMC as a model checker. We validate the approach with examples taken from the literature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":382411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Conference on Feature Interactions in Software and Communication Systems\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Conference on Feature Interactions in Software and Communication Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-60750-014-8-59\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Feature Interactions in Software and Communication Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-60750-014-8-59","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

策略是在运行时修改系统行为的方便方法。如今,从系统管理员到非专业用户,不同的参与者创建了大量的策略。然而,这种情况可能自然导致不一致,这是一个已被认识并称为政策冲突的问题。采用广泛使用的表示法和良好的工具支持来表达策略,不仅可以支持检测,还可以帮助所有相关参与者理解和解决冲突。在这方面,一个自然的候选者是UML,因为它目前在工业实践中广泛使用。在本文中,我们展示了如何对用UML表达的检查策略建模,以验证它们是否没有冲突:我们定义了APPEL策略和UML状态机之间的通信,并使用UMC作为模型检查器。我们用文献中的例子验证了这种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Detecting policy conflicts by model checking UML state machines
Policies are convenient means to modify system behaviour at run-time. Nowadays, policies are created in great numbers by different actors, ranging from system administrators to lay-users. However, this situation may lead naturally to inconsistencies, a problem that has been recognized and termed policy conflict. The adoption of a widely-used notation, with good tool support, to express the policies, can not only support the detection, but also help all the involved actors in understanding and resolving the conflicts. In this respect, a natural candidate is UML due to its current wide use in the industrial practice. In this paper we show how to model check policies expressed in UML to verify whether they are free of conflicts: we define a correspondence between APPEL policies and UML state machines and use UMC as a model checker. We validate the approach with examples taken from the literature.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信