已实现波动率预测

Sabrina Wing-Yi Chio, Yifei Li, Rainie JingRan Yang
{"title":"已实现波动率预测","authors":"Sabrina Wing-Yi Chio, Yifei Li, Rainie JingRan Yang","doi":"10.1145/3501774.3501793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The purpose of this paper is to use machine learning and time series models in the context of high frequency trading to forecast stock prices. Method: We analyzed time series models such as ARMA and GARCH, gradient boosting tree model – which is a deep learning model – and machine learning models FFNN and GBM to compare each models’ benefits and drawbacks. To determine the accuracy of each models’ stock forecasting, we calculated the root mean square percentage error (RMSPE). The RMSPE reveals the magnitude of error in relation to the actual values; a lower value is wanted. Results & Conclusion: After evaluating the models against real market data, we found that the machine learning models outperformed the time series models. Machine learning models FFNN, and GBM have an RMSPE of roughly 0.20 and 0.21, respectively, while time series models Garch 1 and 2 had a RMSPE of 0.32 and 0.37, respectively. Therefore, feed-forward neural network and GBM forecast stock prices more accurately than LSTM and time series models. Unsupervised algorithms improve prediction accuracy.","PeriodicalId":255059,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2021 European Symposium on Software Engineering","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Realized Volatility Prediction\",\"authors\":\"Sabrina Wing-Yi Chio, Yifei Li, Rainie JingRan Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3501774.3501793\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The purpose of this paper is to use machine learning and time series models in the context of high frequency trading to forecast stock prices. Method: We analyzed time series models such as ARMA and GARCH, gradient boosting tree model – which is a deep learning model – and machine learning models FFNN and GBM to compare each models’ benefits and drawbacks. To determine the accuracy of each models’ stock forecasting, we calculated the root mean square percentage error (RMSPE). The RMSPE reveals the magnitude of error in relation to the actual values; a lower value is wanted. Results & Conclusion: After evaluating the models against real market data, we found that the machine learning models outperformed the time series models. Machine learning models FFNN, and GBM have an RMSPE of roughly 0.20 and 0.21, respectively, while time series models Garch 1 and 2 had a RMSPE of 0.32 and 0.37, respectively. Therefore, feed-forward neural network and GBM forecast stock prices more accurately than LSTM and time series models. Unsupervised algorithms improve prediction accuracy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":255059,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2021 European Symposium on Software Engineering\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2021 European Symposium on Software Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3501774.3501793\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2021 European Symposium on Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3501774.3501793","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本文的目的是在高频交易的背景下使用机器学习和时间序列模型来预测股票价格。方法:我们分析了时间序列模型,如ARMA和GARCH,梯度增强树模型-这是一种深度学习模型-以及机器学习模型FFNN和GBM,以比较每种模型的优缺点。为了确定每个模型的股票预测的准确性,我们计算了均方根百分比误差(RMSPE)。RMSPE显示了相对于实际值的误差大小;需要一个更低的值。结果与结论:根据真实市场数据对模型进行评估后,我们发现机器学习模型优于时间序列模型。机器学习模型FFNN和GBM的RMSPE分别约为0.20和0.21,而时间序列模型Garch 1和2的RMSPE分别为0.32和0.37。因此,前馈神经网络和GBM比LSTM和时间序列模型更准确地预测股票价格。无监督算法提高预测精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Realized Volatility Prediction
Objective: The purpose of this paper is to use machine learning and time series models in the context of high frequency trading to forecast stock prices. Method: We analyzed time series models such as ARMA and GARCH, gradient boosting tree model – which is a deep learning model – and machine learning models FFNN and GBM to compare each models’ benefits and drawbacks. To determine the accuracy of each models’ stock forecasting, we calculated the root mean square percentage error (RMSPE). The RMSPE reveals the magnitude of error in relation to the actual values; a lower value is wanted. Results & Conclusion: After evaluating the models against real market data, we found that the machine learning models outperformed the time series models. Machine learning models FFNN, and GBM have an RMSPE of roughly 0.20 and 0.21, respectively, while time series models Garch 1 and 2 had a RMSPE of 0.32 and 0.37, respectively. Therefore, feed-forward neural network and GBM forecast stock prices more accurately than LSTM and time series models. Unsupervised algorithms improve prediction accuracy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信