银行视角下的问题资产救助计划:来自电话会议的证据

Jean Helwege, Xin Liu
{"title":"银行视角下的问题资产救助计划:来自电话会议的证据","authors":"Jean Helwege, Xin Liu","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3904981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using earnings conference calls, we investigate banks’ views of the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). Most banks in our sample did not plan to lend out the funds and our regressions confirm that they did not. The evidence suggests that TARP’s price diminished its usefulness in expanding credit supply. In contrast, banks more often expressed favorable views of the program in terms of its impact on capital ratios. We find that banks often described loan demand during the sample period as weak, but lack of demand does not explain the anemic loan growth that occurred after the TARP injections.","PeriodicalId":331807,"journal":{"name":"Banking & Insurance eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TARP from the Banks’ Perspective: Evidence from Conference Calls\",\"authors\":\"Jean Helwege, Xin Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3904981\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Using earnings conference calls, we investigate banks’ views of the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). Most banks in our sample did not plan to lend out the funds and our regressions confirm that they did not. The evidence suggests that TARP’s price diminished its usefulness in expanding credit supply. In contrast, banks more often expressed favorable views of the program in terms of its impact on capital ratios. We find that banks often described loan demand during the sample period as weak, but lack of demand does not explain the anemic loan growth that occurred after the TARP injections.\",\"PeriodicalId\":331807,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Banking & Insurance eJournal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Banking & Insurance eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3904981\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Banking & Insurance eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3904981","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

利用收益电话会议,我们调查了银行对问题资产救助计划(TARP)的看法。我们样本中的大多数银行不打算借出资金,我们的回归也证实了他们没有这样做。有证据表明,TARP的价格削弱了它在扩大信贷供应方面的作用。相比之下,银行更倾向于对该计划对资本比率的影响表示赞同。我们发现,银行通常将样本期内的贷款需求描述为疲软,但需求不足并不能解释TARP注资后出现的贷款增长乏力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
TARP from the Banks’ Perspective: Evidence from Conference Calls
Using earnings conference calls, we investigate banks’ views of the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). Most banks in our sample did not plan to lend out the funds and our regressions confirm that they did not. The evidence suggests that TARP’s price diminished its usefulness in expanding credit supply. In contrast, banks more often expressed favorable views of the program in terms of its impact on capital ratios. We find that banks often described loan demand during the sample period as weak, but lack of demand does not explain the anemic loan growth that occurred after the TARP injections.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信