重新审视的本土清理:菲律宾文学的定位

C. Kanaganayakam
{"title":"重新审视的本土清理:菲律宾文学的定位","authors":"C. Kanaganayakam","doi":"10.1163/9789401207393_025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"English-language postcolonial literary studies has focused largely on parts of the world formerly colonized by England. This panel, however, will deal with the Philippines, a nation whose history of colonial encounter includes both Spain and the US, in order to advance the argument that its literature has much to contribute to the \"arduous conversations\" that characterize postcolonial studies. While the historical trajectory that shapes the identity of the Philippines has much in common with the narrative of other postcolonial nations, the resistance/recuperation model does not fit easily in the Philippines. Even among literary histories and critical studies there is hardly a consensus about a theoretical matrix that would explain the complexities of literary production in the Philippines in the twentieth century. This panel contends that literature from the Philippines grapples with a number of issues in ways that extend the boundaries of postcolonial theory and opens up exciting possibilities for reconfiguring nation, religion, genre, aesthetics, and the very notion of literature.","PeriodicalId":430742,"journal":{"name":"Literature For Our Times","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Native Clearing Revisited: Positioning Philippine Literature\",\"authors\":\"C. Kanaganayakam\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/9789401207393_025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"English-language postcolonial literary studies has focused largely on parts of the world formerly colonized by England. This panel, however, will deal with the Philippines, a nation whose history of colonial encounter includes both Spain and the US, in order to advance the argument that its literature has much to contribute to the \\\"arduous conversations\\\" that characterize postcolonial studies. While the historical trajectory that shapes the identity of the Philippines has much in common with the narrative of other postcolonial nations, the resistance/recuperation model does not fit easily in the Philippines. Even among literary histories and critical studies there is hardly a consensus about a theoretical matrix that would explain the complexities of literary production in the Philippines in the twentieth century. This panel contends that literature from the Philippines grapples with a number of issues in ways that extend the boundaries of postcolonial theory and opens up exciting possibilities for reconfiguring nation, religion, genre, aesthetics, and the very notion of literature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":430742,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Literature For Our Times\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Literature For Our Times\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401207393_025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Literature For Our Times","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401207393_025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

英语后殖民文学研究主要集中在世界上以前被英国殖民的部分地区。这个小组,然而,将处理菲律宾,一个国家的历史上的殖民遭遇包括西班牙和美国,为了推进的论点,其文学有很多贡献的“艰巨的对话”特征后殖民研究。虽然塑造菲律宾身份的历史轨迹与其他后殖民国家的叙事有很多共同之处,但抵抗/恢复模式并不适合菲律宾。即使在文学史和批评研究中,也很难就一个理论矩阵达成共识,这个理论矩阵可以解释20世纪菲律宾文学生产的复杂性。该小组认为,来自菲律宾的文学以扩展后殖民理论边界的方式与许多问题作斗争,并为重新配置民族,宗教,体裁,美学和文学的概念开辟了令人兴奋的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Native Clearing Revisited: Positioning Philippine Literature
English-language postcolonial literary studies has focused largely on parts of the world formerly colonized by England. This panel, however, will deal with the Philippines, a nation whose history of colonial encounter includes both Spain and the US, in order to advance the argument that its literature has much to contribute to the "arduous conversations" that characterize postcolonial studies. While the historical trajectory that shapes the identity of the Philippines has much in common with the narrative of other postcolonial nations, the resistance/recuperation model does not fit easily in the Philippines. Even among literary histories and critical studies there is hardly a consensus about a theoretical matrix that would explain the complexities of literary production in the Philippines in the twentieth century. This panel contends that literature from the Philippines grapples with a number of issues in ways that extend the boundaries of postcolonial theory and opens up exciting possibilities for reconfiguring nation, religion, genre, aesthetics, and the very notion of literature.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信