多孔挡土坝与MERGE沟侵蚀模型

M. E. Roberts, Kevin Roots
{"title":"多孔挡土坝与MERGE沟侵蚀模型","authors":"M. E. Roberts, Kevin Roots","doi":"10.36334/modsim.2023.roberts","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Gullies are hot spots of erosion. Gullies are the majority source of sediment that ultimately reaches the Great Barrier Reef despite occupying less than 1% of the catchment. Consequently, considerable investment and effort has focussed on preventing gully erosion through on-site remediation activities. Porous check dams (PCDs) are a common tool in erosion mitigation activities. PCDs are designed to slow the velocity of water through a channel, promoting the deposition of sediment, nutrients and seeds above the dam. Field observations suggest that, in some cases, PCDs can lead to increased scouring below the dam, risking a net increase in erosion relative to pre-intervention conditions. This paper uses the MERGE gully erosion model to explore whether the installation of a PCD can trigger increased scouring below the dam, and consequently a net increase in the amount of sediment delivered to receiving waters. Eight scenarios, covering four flow regimes and two boundary conditions, are explored. We simulate constant depth flows of 0.1 m and 0.5 m depth in a reference gully channel with inflow concentrations from the head of 50 kg/m 3 and 100 kg/m 3 . Varying depth flows are simulated with a sinusoidal function with amplitudes of 0.1 m and 0.5 m depth with the two different inflow concentrations. The reference gully is a small linear gully of 2 m width, 60 m long channel and 2% slope. The sediment is easily eroded, with a density of 1330 kg/m 3 , and 10 µ m particle size and with low cohesion. The PCD is installed 40 m from the start of the channel. The effect of the PCD is explored considering the growth of a depositional layer, and changes in the sediment delivery rate, that is the net sediment flux exiting the gully. This modelling investigation demonstrates that the installation of a PCD can lead to an internal step (or head/waterfall) forming below the PCD. In all simulations the PCD reduced the sediment delivery rate at early times, however in five of the eight scenarios the PCD resulted in a net increase in the sediment delivery rate by the end of the simulation. The increased sediment delivery rate is a direct consequence of accumulation behind the sediment creating a step, or internal head, at the PCD. This introduces an increase in the power available to erode, and therefore a greater rate of entrainment below the PCD. These results highlight the importance of ongoing monitoring and maintenance of PCDs to ensure they continue to operate as intended.","PeriodicalId":390064,"journal":{"name":"MODSIM2023, 25th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation.","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Porous check dams and the MERGE gully erosion model\",\"authors\":\"M. E. Roberts, Kevin Roots\",\"doi\":\"10.36334/modsim.2023.roberts\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Gullies are hot spots of erosion. Gullies are the majority source of sediment that ultimately reaches the Great Barrier Reef despite occupying less than 1% of the catchment. Consequently, considerable investment and effort has focussed on preventing gully erosion through on-site remediation activities. Porous check dams (PCDs) are a common tool in erosion mitigation activities. PCDs are designed to slow the velocity of water through a channel, promoting the deposition of sediment, nutrients and seeds above the dam. Field observations suggest that, in some cases, PCDs can lead to increased scouring below the dam, risking a net increase in erosion relative to pre-intervention conditions. This paper uses the MERGE gully erosion model to explore whether the installation of a PCD can trigger increased scouring below the dam, and consequently a net increase in the amount of sediment delivered to receiving waters. Eight scenarios, covering four flow regimes and two boundary conditions, are explored. We simulate constant depth flows of 0.1 m and 0.5 m depth in a reference gully channel with inflow concentrations from the head of 50 kg/m 3 and 100 kg/m 3 . Varying depth flows are simulated with a sinusoidal function with amplitudes of 0.1 m and 0.5 m depth with the two different inflow concentrations. The reference gully is a small linear gully of 2 m width, 60 m long channel and 2% slope. The sediment is easily eroded, with a density of 1330 kg/m 3 , and 10 µ m particle size and with low cohesion. The PCD is installed 40 m from the start of the channel. The effect of the PCD is explored considering the growth of a depositional layer, and changes in the sediment delivery rate, that is the net sediment flux exiting the gully. This modelling investigation demonstrates that the installation of a PCD can lead to an internal step (or head/waterfall) forming below the PCD. In all simulations the PCD reduced the sediment delivery rate at early times, however in five of the eight scenarios the PCD resulted in a net increase in the sediment delivery rate by the end of the simulation. The increased sediment delivery rate is a direct consequence of accumulation behind the sediment creating a step, or internal head, at the PCD. This introduces an increase in the power available to erode, and therefore a greater rate of entrainment below the PCD. These results highlight the importance of ongoing monitoring and maintenance of PCDs to ensure they continue to operate as intended.\",\"PeriodicalId\":390064,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MODSIM2023, 25th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation.\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MODSIM2023, 25th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36334/modsim.2023.roberts\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MODSIM2023, 25th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36334/modsim.2023.roberts","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

沟壑是侵蚀的热点。尽管占据了不到1%的集水区,但沟壑是最终到达大堡礁的沉积物的主要来源。因此,大量的投资和努力集中在通过现场补救活动防止沟壑侵蚀上。多孔止回坝(PCDs)是减缓侵蚀活动的常用工具。设计PCDs是为了减缓水流的速度,促进沉积物、营养物质和种子在大坝上方的沉积。现场观察表明,在某些情况下,pcd可能导致坝下冲刷加剧,相对于干预前的情况,有可能导致侵蚀净增加。本文使用MERGE沟道侵蚀模型来探讨PCD的安装是否会引发坝下冲刷增加,从而导致输送到接收水域的泥沙量净增加。八个场景,涵盖四种流动形式和两种边界条件,进行了探讨。我们在参考沟渠中模拟了0.1 m和0.5 m深度的恒定深度流,其中来自头部的流入浓度为50 kg/m 3和100 kg/m 3。用振幅分别为0.1 m和0.5 m的正弦函数模拟两种不同入流浓度下的变深度流动。参考沟是一个2米宽、60米长、坡度为2%的小线性沟。泥沙易被侵蚀,密度为1330 kg/ m3,粒径为10µm,粘聚力较低。PCD安装在距离通道起点40米的位置。考虑沉积层的生长和输沙率的变化,即出沟的净输沙通量,探讨了PCD的影响。该模型研究表明,安装PCD可以导致PCD下方形成内部台阶(或头/瀑布)。在所有的模拟中,PCD在早期都降低了沉积物的输送速率,但是在8个情景中,有5个情景的PCD在模拟结束时导致了沉积物输送速率的净增加。沉积物输送速率的增加是沉积物堆积在PCD后面形成台阶或内部头部的直接结果。这增加了可用的腐蚀功率,从而提高了PCD以下的夹带速率。这些结果突出了持续监测和维护PCDs以确保其继续按预期运行的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Porous check dams and the MERGE gully erosion model
: Gullies are hot spots of erosion. Gullies are the majority source of sediment that ultimately reaches the Great Barrier Reef despite occupying less than 1% of the catchment. Consequently, considerable investment and effort has focussed on preventing gully erosion through on-site remediation activities. Porous check dams (PCDs) are a common tool in erosion mitigation activities. PCDs are designed to slow the velocity of water through a channel, promoting the deposition of sediment, nutrients and seeds above the dam. Field observations suggest that, in some cases, PCDs can lead to increased scouring below the dam, risking a net increase in erosion relative to pre-intervention conditions. This paper uses the MERGE gully erosion model to explore whether the installation of a PCD can trigger increased scouring below the dam, and consequently a net increase in the amount of sediment delivered to receiving waters. Eight scenarios, covering four flow regimes and two boundary conditions, are explored. We simulate constant depth flows of 0.1 m and 0.5 m depth in a reference gully channel with inflow concentrations from the head of 50 kg/m 3 and 100 kg/m 3 . Varying depth flows are simulated with a sinusoidal function with amplitudes of 0.1 m and 0.5 m depth with the two different inflow concentrations. The reference gully is a small linear gully of 2 m width, 60 m long channel and 2% slope. The sediment is easily eroded, with a density of 1330 kg/m 3 , and 10 µ m particle size and with low cohesion. The PCD is installed 40 m from the start of the channel. The effect of the PCD is explored considering the growth of a depositional layer, and changes in the sediment delivery rate, that is the net sediment flux exiting the gully. This modelling investigation demonstrates that the installation of a PCD can lead to an internal step (or head/waterfall) forming below the PCD. In all simulations the PCD reduced the sediment delivery rate at early times, however in five of the eight scenarios the PCD resulted in a net increase in the sediment delivery rate by the end of the simulation. The increased sediment delivery rate is a direct consequence of accumulation behind the sediment creating a step, or internal head, at the PCD. This introduces an increase in the power available to erode, and therefore a greater rate of entrainment below the PCD. These results highlight the importance of ongoing monitoring and maintenance of PCDs to ensure they continue to operate as intended.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信