实际实体和实际场合:这两个术语是可以互换还是完全不同?

Process Studies Pub Date : 2017-10-01 DOI:10.5406/processstudies.46.2.0270

Joseph Bracken, S.J.

{"title":"实际实体和实际场合:这两个术语是可以互换还是完全不同?","authors":"Joseph Bracken, S.J.","doi":"10.5406/processstudies.46.2.0270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In this article I argue against the claim that “actual entity” and “actual occasion” are synonymous in Whitehead. My examination of these terms will help to illuminate the role of “society” in Whitehead’s philosophy and to prepare the way for a fruitful comparison of process thought and contemporary systems theory in the sciences.","PeriodicalId":315123,"journal":{"name":"Process Studies","volume":"91 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Actual Entity and Actual Occasion: Are These Terms Interchangeable or Quite Different?\",\"authors\":\"Joseph Bracken, S.J.\",\"doi\":\"10.5406/processstudies.46.2.0270\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n In this article I argue against the claim that “actual entity” and “actual occasion” are synonymous in Whitehead. My examination of these terms will help to illuminate the role of “society” in Whitehead’s philosophy and to prepare the way for a fruitful comparison of process thought and contemporary systems theory in the sciences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":315123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Process Studies\",\"volume\":\"91 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Process Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5406/processstudies.46.2.0270\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Process Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/processstudies.46.2.0270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇文章中，我反对“实际实体”和“实际场合”在怀特黑德是同义词的说法。我对这些术语的研究将有助于阐明“社会”在怀特黑德哲学中的作用，并为过程思想和当代科学系统理论的富有成效的比较铺平道路。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Actual Entity and Actual Occasion: Are These Terms Interchangeable or Quite Different?

In this article I argue against the claim that “actual entity” and “actual occasion” are synonymous in Whitehead. My examination of these terms will help to illuminate the role of “society” in Whitehead’s philosophy and to prepare the way for a fruitful comparison of process thought and contemporary systems theory in the sciences.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Process Studies

自引率

0.00%

发文量