21世纪评估:重新设计以优化学习

Vanessa Svihla, Drue Gawel, Megan Brown, Allison L. Moore, N. Vye, J. Bransford
{"title":"21世纪评估:重新设计以优化学习","authors":"Vanessa Svihla, Drue Gawel, Megan Brown, Allison L. Moore, N. Vye, J. Bransford","doi":"10.22318/ICLS2010.2.474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This poster presents design implications related to findings from research on the development of Interactive Learning Assessments (ILAs). Standardized assessments using multiple choice questions cannot measure the most critical aspects of learning for the 21st century. ILAs place students in advisory roles, leveraging a place-based metaphor to navigate, learn, then give counsel in situations in which they do not already know how to solve the problem; we assess how students learn to learn.","PeriodicalId":145751,"journal":{"name":"International Conference of the Learning Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"21st Century Assessment: Redesigning to Optimize Learning\",\"authors\":\"Vanessa Svihla, Drue Gawel, Megan Brown, Allison L. Moore, N. Vye, J. Bransford\",\"doi\":\"10.22318/ICLS2010.2.474\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This poster presents design implications related to findings from research on the development of Interactive Learning Assessments (ILAs). Standardized assessments using multiple choice questions cannot measure the most critical aspects of learning for the 21st century. ILAs place students in advisory roles, leveraging a place-based metaphor to navigate, learn, then give counsel in situations in which they do not already know how to solve the problem; we assess how students learn to learn.\",\"PeriodicalId\":145751,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Conference of the Learning Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Conference of the Learning Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22318/ICLS2010.2.474\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference of the Learning Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22318/ICLS2010.2.474","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

这张海报展示了与互动学习评估(ILAs)开发研究结果相关的设计含义。使用多项选择题的标准化评估无法衡量21世纪学习中最关键的方面。ILAs让学生扮演顾问的角色,利用基于地点的隐喻来引导、学习,然后在他们还不知道如何解决问题的情况下给出建议;我们评估学生如何学会学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
21st Century Assessment: Redesigning to Optimize Learning
This poster presents design implications related to findings from research on the development of Interactive Learning Assessments (ILAs). Standardized assessments using multiple choice questions cannot measure the most critical aspects of learning for the 21st century. ILAs place students in advisory roles, leveraging a place-based metaphor to navigate, learn, then give counsel in situations in which they do not already know how to solve the problem; we assess how students learn to learn.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信