军事行动中的系统概念。批判讨论

J. Anteroinen
{"title":"军事行动中的系统概念。批判讨论","authors":"J. Anteroinen","doi":"10.1109/SysCon.2013.6549866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses contemporary military operations concepts, based on a systems approach. These concepts include the U.S. effects-based operations (EBO), NATO's effects-based approach to operations (EBAO) and comprehensive approach (CA) and Israel's systemic operational design (SOD). The paper describes the concepts, reviews the critique of these concepts and discusses the critique from the systems perspective. A systems engineering framework is used as a structure for discussion. The paper is an exploratory type of research which aims to provide fresh insights regarding the challenges and failings of the concepts under discussion. Hence, the contribution of the paper is contextual in nature. The findings of the paper suggest that the expectations for the systems approach to help solve the needs of the military community have perhaps been too ambitious. The chosen systems method, systems analysis and systems techniques for these concepts are probably too limited to be able to support the creation of a holistic understanding of the operational environment.","PeriodicalId":218073,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE International Systems Conference (SysCon)","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The systems concepts in military operations - Discussion of critique\",\"authors\":\"J. Anteroinen\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SysCon.2013.6549866\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper discusses contemporary military operations concepts, based on a systems approach. These concepts include the U.S. effects-based operations (EBO), NATO's effects-based approach to operations (EBAO) and comprehensive approach (CA) and Israel's systemic operational design (SOD). The paper describes the concepts, reviews the critique of these concepts and discusses the critique from the systems perspective. A systems engineering framework is used as a structure for discussion. The paper is an exploratory type of research which aims to provide fresh insights regarding the challenges and failings of the concepts under discussion. Hence, the contribution of the paper is contextual in nature. The findings of the paper suggest that the expectations for the systems approach to help solve the needs of the military community have perhaps been too ambitious. The chosen systems method, systems analysis and systems techniques for these concepts are probably too limited to be able to support the creation of a holistic understanding of the operational environment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":218073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 IEEE International Systems Conference (SysCon)\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 IEEE International Systems Conference (SysCon)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SysCon.2013.6549866\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE International Systems Conference (SysCon)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SysCon.2013.6549866","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文基于系统方法讨论了当代军事行动概念。这些概念包括美国基于效果的作战(EBO)、北约基于效果的作战方法(EBAO)和综合方法(CA)以及以色列的系统作战设计(SOD)。本文描述了这些概念,回顾了对这些概念的批判,并从系统的角度对这些批判进行了讨论。系统工程框架被用作讨论的结构。本文是一种探索性研究,旨在为讨论中的概念的挑战和失败提供新的见解。因此,论文的贡献是上下文的性质。论文的研究结果表明,对帮助解决军事社区需求的系统方法的期望可能过于雄心勃勃。为这些概念所选择的系统方法、系统分析和系统技术可能太过有限,无法支持创建对操作环境的整体理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The systems concepts in military operations - Discussion of critique
This paper discusses contemporary military operations concepts, based on a systems approach. These concepts include the U.S. effects-based operations (EBO), NATO's effects-based approach to operations (EBAO) and comprehensive approach (CA) and Israel's systemic operational design (SOD). The paper describes the concepts, reviews the critique of these concepts and discusses the critique from the systems perspective. A systems engineering framework is used as a structure for discussion. The paper is an exploratory type of research which aims to provide fresh insights regarding the challenges and failings of the concepts under discussion. Hence, the contribution of the paper is contextual in nature. The findings of the paper suggest that the expectations for the systems approach to help solve the needs of the military community have perhaps been too ambitious. The chosen systems method, systems analysis and systems techniques for these concepts are probably too limited to be able to support the creation of a holistic understanding of the operational environment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信