成人二语学习者手语和口语评估中有效性问题的讨论

C. Chapelle, P. Hauser, Hye-won Lee, C. Rathmann, Krister Schönström
{"title":"成人二语学习者手语和口语评估中有效性问题的讨论","authors":"C. Chapelle, P. Hauser, Hye-won Lee, C. Rathmann, Krister Schönström","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190885052.003.0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of argument-based validity as a framework for discussion of validity issues in spoken and signed second language (L2) assessment reveals many areas of commonality. Common areas include the role of systematic test development practices in the validity argument, the complexity of rating issues, the need to define and assess a construct of functional communication of meaning, and the centrality of test use in the validity argument. Examining these areas of commonality in this chapter reveals the fundamental similarities in the basic validity issues faced in spoken and signed language assessment. This chapter is a joint discussion of key items related to validation issues related to signed and spoken language assessment that were discussed in Chapters 8.1 and 8.2.","PeriodicalId":150857,"journal":{"name":"The Handbook of Language Assessment Across Modalities","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discussion of Validation Issues in Signed and Spoken Assessments for Adult L2 Learners\",\"authors\":\"C. Chapelle, P. Hauser, Hye-won Lee, C. Rathmann, Krister Schönström\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780190885052.003.0025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The use of argument-based validity as a framework for discussion of validity issues in spoken and signed second language (L2) assessment reveals many areas of commonality. Common areas include the role of systematic test development practices in the validity argument, the complexity of rating issues, the need to define and assess a construct of functional communication of meaning, and the centrality of test use in the validity argument. Examining these areas of commonality in this chapter reveals the fundamental similarities in the basic validity issues faced in spoken and signed language assessment. This chapter is a joint discussion of key items related to validation issues related to signed and spoken language assessment that were discussed in Chapters 8.1 and 8.2.\",\"PeriodicalId\":150857,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Handbook of Language Assessment Across Modalities\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Handbook of Language Assessment Across Modalities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190885052.003.0025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Handbook of Language Assessment Across Modalities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190885052.003.0025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在口语和手语第二语言(L2)评估中,使用基于论证的效度作为讨论效度问题的框架,揭示了许多共性。常见的领域包括系统测试开发实践在有效性论证中的作用,评级问题的复杂性,定义和评估意义的功能性沟通结构的需要,以及有效性论证中测试使用的中心性。本章对这些共性领域的考察揭示了口语和手语评估所面临的基本有效性问题的基本相似性。本章将联合讨论第8.1章和第8.2章讨论的与手语和口语评估相关的验证问题相关的关键项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Discussion of Validation Issues in Signed and Spoken Assessments for Adult L2 Learners
The use of argument-based validity as a framework for discussion of validity issues in spoken and signed second language (L2) assessment reveals many areas of commonality. Common areas include the role of systematic test development practices in the validity argument, the complexity of rating issues, the need to define and assess a construct of functional communication of meaning, and the centrality of test use in the validity argument. Examining these areas of commonality in this chapter reveals the fundamental similarities in the basic validity issues faced in spoken and signed language assessment. This chapter is a joint discussion of key items related to validation issues related to signed and spoken language assessment that were discussed in Chapters 8.1 and 8.2.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信