公共服务、个人数据和机器学习:基础设施和生态系统的前景

J. Keen, R. Ruddle, Jan Palczewski, G. Aivaliotis, Muhammad Adnan, Anna Palczewska, C. Megone
{"title":"公共服务、个人数据和机器学习:基础设施和生态系统的前景","authors":"J. Keen, R. Ruddle, Jan Palczewski, G. Aivaliotis, Muhammad Adnan, Anna Palczewska, C. Megone","doi":"10.34190/ecdg.19.039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a widespread belief that machine learning tools will improve decision-making in health and social care. Equally there are concerns that the new tools, used with large personal datasets, will jeopardise privacy and erode trust. We reflect on experiences gained in the course of the Quanticode research and development project in England. These suggest that the opportunities are real: it is possible to generate insights that are valued by health and social care planners. The concerns are also real, though, indicating that there is a need to address them, and to balance opportunities and risks. The terrain is also contested, with evidence of differences in values relating to the ownership of datasets in particular. We argue that developments in the governance of tools and datasets will be substantially shaped by the concerns and by debates over values.","PeriodicalId":168088,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 19th European Conference on Digital Government","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public Services, Personal Data and Machine Learning: Prospects for Infrastructures and Ecosystems\",\"authors\":\"J. Keen, R. Ruddle, Jan Palczewski, G. Aivaliotis, Muhammad Adnan, Anna Palczewska, C. Megone\",\"doi\":\"10.34190/ecdg.19.039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is a widespread belief that machine learning tools will improve decision-making in health and social care. Equally there are concerns that the new tools, used with large personal datasets, will jeopardise privacy and erode trust. We reflect on experiences gained in the course of the Quanticode research and development project in England. These suggest that the opportunities are real: it is possible to generate insights that are valued by health and social care planners. The concerns are also real, though, indicating that there is a need to address them, and to balance opportunities and risks. The terrain is also contested, with evidence of differences in values relating to the ownership of datasets in particular. We argue that developments in the governance of tools and datasets will be substantially shaped by the concerns and by debates over values.\",\"PeriodicalId\":168088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 19th European Conference on Digital Government\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 19th European Conference on Digital Government\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34190/ecdg.19.039\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 19th European Conference on Digital Government","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34190/ecdg.19.039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们普遍认为,机器学习工具将改善医疗和社会保健方面的决策。同样有人担心,与大型个人数据集一起使用的新工具将危及隐私并侵蚀信任。我们反思在英国Quanticode研发项目过程中所获得的经验。这些表明,机会是真实存在的:有可能产生卫生和社会保健规划者所重视的见解。然而,这些担忧也是真实存在的,表明有必要解决这些问题,并平衡机遇和风险。地形也是有争议的,有证据表明,特别是与数据集所有权相关的价值存在差异。我们认为,工具和数据集治理的发展将在很大程度上受到对价值的关注和辩论的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Public Services, Personal Data and Machine Learning: Prospects for Infrastructures and Ecosystems
There is a widespread belief that machine learning tools will improve decision-making in health and social care. Equally there are concerns that the new tools, used with large personal datasets, will jeopardise privacy and erode trust. We reflect on experiences gained in the course of the Quanticode research and development project in England. These suggest that the opportunities are real: it is possible to generate insights that are valued by health and social care planners. The concerns are also real, though, indicating that there is a need to address them, and to balance opportunities and risks. The terrain is also contested, with evidence of differences in values relating to the ownership of datasets in particular. We argue that developments in the governance of tools and datasets will be substantially shaped by the concerns and by debates over values.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信