同期颅骨成形术与分期颅骨成形术重建双侧颅骨切除术

Young-Min Park, James Y. Shin, Young Il Kim, B. Son, J. Sung, Young-Joo Kim, S. Yang
{"title":"同期颅骨成形术与分期颅骨成形术重建双侧颅骨切除术","authors":"Young-Min Park, James Y. Shin, Young Il Kim, B. Son, J. Sung, Young-Joo Kim, S. Yang","doi":"10.21129/nerve.2022.00101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Cranioplasty (CP) following decompressive craniectomy (DC) is of low complexity surgically. However, even this “simple” procedure may have a high complication rate, especial-ly for the reconstruction of bilateral craniectomy compared to the reconstruction of unilateral craniectomy. This study aimed to assess and compare the rate of complications between simultaneous and staged CP for the reconstruction of bilateral craniectomy. Methods: All patients who underwent CP at our institution following DC for stroke or traumatic brain injury between 2008 and 2017 were reviewed. A total of 139 patients were iden-tified, of whom 17 underwent bilateral CP. Simultaneous and staged CP was performed in 6 and 11 patients, respectively. The median time from craniectomy until CP was 94 days (range, 25-220 days). In patients with staged CP, the interval between the first CP and the second CP was 15 days (range, 6-43 days). The overall rate of complications, such as postoperative bleed-ing, seizures, postoperative infection, and hydrocephalus, was 16%. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in outcome variables between simultaneous CP and staged CP for the reconstruction of bilateral craniectomy, except for estimated blood loss. The estimated blood loss was lower in patients who underwent staged CP than in those who underwent simultaneous CP. The length of hospital stay was naturally longer when staged CP was performed. Conclusion: No significant differences were found in outcome variables between simultaneous and staged CP for the reconstruction of bilateral craniectomy, except for estimated blood loss and the length of hospital stay. Therefore, simultaneous CP might be more beneficial for economic reasons than staged CP.","PeriodicalId":229172,"journal":{"name":"The Nerve","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simultaneous Cranioplasty vs. Staged Cranioplasty for Reconstruction of Bilateral Craniectomy\",\"authors\":\"Young-Min Park, James Y. Shin, Young Il Kim, B. Son, J. Sung, Young-Joo Kim, S. Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.21129/nerve.2022.00101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Cranioplasty (CP) following decompressive craniectomy (DC) is of low complexity surgically. However, even this “simple” procedure may have a high complication rate, especial-ly for the reconstruction of bilateral craniectomy compared to the reconstruction of unilateral craniectomy. This study aimed to assess and compare the rate of complications between simultaneous and staged CP for the reconstruction of bilateral craniectomy. Methods: All patients who underwent CP at our institution following DC for stroke or traumatic brain injury between 2008 and 2017 were reviewed. A total of 139 patients were iden-tified, of whom 17 underwent bilateral CP. Simultaneous and staged CP was performed in 6 and 11 patients, respectively. The median time from craniectomy until CP was 94 days (range, 25-220 days). In patients with staged CP, the interval between the first CP and the second CP was 15 days (range, 6-43 days). The overall rate of complications, such as postoperative bleed-ing, seizures, postoperative infection, and hydrocephalus, was 16%. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in outcome variables between simultaneous CP and staged CP for the reconstruction of bilateral craniectomy, except for estimated blood loss. The estimated blood loss was lower in patients who underwent staged CP than in those who underwent simultaneous CP. The length of hospital stay was naturally longer when staged CP was performed. Conclusion: No significant differences were found in outcome variables between simultaneous and staged CP for the reconstruction of bilateral craniectomy, except for estimated blood loss and the length of hospital stay. Therefore, simultaneous CP might be more beneficial for economic reasons than staged CP.\",\"PeriodicalId\":229172,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Nerve\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Nerve\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21129/nerve.2022.00101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Nerve","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21129/nerve.2022.00101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:减压颅骨切除术(DC)后颅骨成形术(CP)手术复杂性低。然而,即使是这种“简单”的手术也可能有很高的并发症发生率,特别是与单侧颅骨切除术重建相比,双侧颅骨切除术重建的并发症发生率更高。本研究旨在评估和比较双侧颅骨切除术重建中同步和分期CP的并发症发生率。方法:回顾性分析2008年至2017年在我院因卒中或创伤性脑损伤DC后接受CP治疗的所有患者。共有139例患者被确诊,其中17例接受了双侧CP。同时和分期CP分别在6例和11例患者中进行。从颅骨切除术到CP的中位时间为94天(范围25-220天)。在分期CP患者中,第一次CP和第二次CP之间的间隔为15天(范围6-43天)。术后出血、癫痫、术后感染和脑积水等并发症的总发生率为16%。结果:在双侧颅骨切除术重建中,同步CP与分期CP的结局变量除估计失血量外,无统计学差异。分阶段CP患者的估计失血量低于同期CP患者。分阶段CP患者的住院时间自然更长。结论:除了估计的出血量和住院时间外,双侧颅骨切除术重建的同时手术和分期手术的预后变量无显著差异。因此,从经济角度考虑,同时进行CP可能比分期进行CP更有利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Simultaneous Cranioplasty vs. Staged Cranioplasty for Reconstruction of Bilateral Craniectomy
Objective: Cranioplasty (CP) following decompressive craniectomy (DC) is of low complexity surgically. However, even this “simple” procedure may have a high complication rate, especial-ly for the reconstruction of bilateral craniectomy compared to the reconstruction of unilateral craniectomy. This study aimed to assess and compare the rate of complications between simultaneous and staged CP for the reconstruction of bilateral craniectomy. Methods: All patients who underwent CP at our institution following DC for stroke or traumatic brain injury between 2008 and 2017 were reviewed. A total of 139 patients were iden-tified, of whom 17 underwent bilateral CP. Simultaneous and staged CP was performed in 6 and 11 patients, respectively. The median time from craniectomy until CP was 94 days (range, 25-220 days). In patients with staged CP, the interval between the first CP and the second CP was 15 days (range, 6-43 days). The overall rate of complications, such as postoperative bleed-ing, seizures, postoperative infection, and hydrocephalus, was 16%. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in outcome variables between simultaneous CP and staged CP for the reconstruction of bilateral craniectomy, except for estimated blood loss. The estimated blood loss was lower in patients who underwent staged CP than in those who underwent simultaneous CP. The length of hospital stay was naturally longer when staged CP was performed. Conclusion: No significant differences were found in outcome variables between simultaneous and staged CP for the reconstruction of bilateral craniectomy, except for estimated blood loss and the length of hospital stay. Therefore, simultaneous CP might be more beneficial for economic reasons than staged CP.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信