{"title":"光学和激光三维扫描仪的比较","authors":"T. Tóth, Viktória Rajťúková, J. Živčák","doi":"10.1109/CINTI.2013.6705168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Various types of 3D scanners are used for digitalization of objects. These are mostly different types of optical or laser 3D scanners. The presented article deals with the comparison of the Steinbichler Comet L3D optical scanner and the Creaform HandyScan EXAscan laser scanner. For scanners comparison, a specimen was designed that satisfies scanning criteria for both types of the 3D scanners; i.e. it does not contain complicated shapes or parts that are not possible to scan using the chosen technologies (deep apertures with a small diameter, corners, etc.). The designed specimen was scanned 3 times using both types of 3D scanners. The obtained images were then cleaned (elimination of unwanted artifacts) and exported to STL files. The data was evaluated in VolumeGraphics VGStudio MAX 2.2. In the comparison selected dimensions, shape and orientational deviations were evaluated and the scanned image obtained was compared to the CAD model.","PeriodicalId":439949,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE 14th International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Informatics (CINTI)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of optical and laser 3D scanners\",\"authors\":\"T. Tóth, Viktória Rajťúková, J. Živčák\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CINTI.2013.6705168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Various types of 3D scanners are used for digitalization of objects. These are mostly different types of optical or laser 3D scanners. The presented article deals with the comparison of the Steinbichler Comet L3D optical scanner and the Creaform HandyScan EXAscan laser scanner. For scanners comparison, a specimen was designed that satisfies scanning criteria for both types of the 3D scanners; i.e. it does not contain complicated shapes or parts that are not possible to scan using the chosen technologies (deep apertures with a small diameter, corners, etc.). The designed specimen was scanned 3 times using both types of 3D scanners. The obtained images were then cleaned (elimination of unwanted artifacts) and exported to STL files. The data was evaluated in VolumeGraphics VGStudio MAX 2.2. In the comparison selected dimensions, shape and orientational deviations were evaluated and the scanned image obtained was compared to the CAD model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":439949,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 IEEE 14th International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Informatics (CINTI)\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 IEEE 14th International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Informatics (CINTI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CINTI.2013.6705168\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE 14th International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Informatics (CINTI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CINTI.2013.6705168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
各种类型的三维扫描仪用于物体的数字化。这些大多是不同类型的光学或激光3D扫描仪。本文对Steinbichler Comet L3D光学扫描仪和Creaform HandyScan EXAscan激光扫描仪进行了比较。为了对扫描仪进行比较,设计了满足两种类型3D扫描仪扫描标准的样品;也就是说,它不包含使用所选技术无法扫描的复杂形状或部件(直径小的深孔,角落等)。设计的样品使用两种类型的3D扫描仪扫描3次。然后清理获得的图像(消除不需要的工件)并导出到STL文件。在VolumeGraphics VGStudio MAX 2.2中对数据进行评估。在比较中,评估了所选尺寸、形状和方向的偏差,并将获得的扫描图像与CAD模型进行了比较。
Various types of 3D scanners are used for digitalization of objects. These are mostly different types of optical or laser 3D scanners. The presented article deals with the comparison of the Steinbichler Comet L3D optical scanner and the Creaform HandyScan EXAscan laser scanner. For scanners comparison, a specimen was designed that satisfies scanning criteria for both types of the 3D scanners; i.e. it does not contain complicated shapes or parts that are not possible to scan using the chosen technologies (deep apertures with a small diameter, corners, etc.). The designed specimen was scanned 3 times using both types of 3D scanners. The obtained images were then cleaned (elimination of unwanted artifacts) and exported to STL files. The data was evaluated in VolumeGraphics VGStudio MAX 2.2. In the comparison selected dimensions, shape and orientational deviations were evaluated and the scanned image obtained was compared to the CAD model.