铁路罐车历史无损评估(NDE)检测概率(POD)数据的定量评估

Anish Poudel, Silvia Galván-Núñez, Brian Lindeman, Fancisco Gonzalez
{"title":"铁路罐车历史无损评估(NDE)检测概率(POD)数据的定量评估","authors":"Anish Poudel, Silvia Galván-Núñez, Brian Lindeman, Fancisco Gonzalez","doi":"10.32548/rs.2022.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses a comprehensive analysis and quantitative assessment of two decades of nondestructive evaluation probability of detection (NDE POD) data collected using the Code of Federal Regulations’ (CFR)-approved NDE methods for railroad tank cars. The results obtained from this research demonstrate that these methods were not capable of achieving or approaching a 90-percent POD with 95-percent confidence (90/95 POD) for fatigue cracks in the butt weld (BW) test panels from the operators who participated in this research. The evaluation of the fillet weld (FW) data showed mixed results, but only the magnetic particle testing (MT) method reached 90/95 POD. Also, excessive false calls were observed in both the BW and the FW inspection results. These results indicate the variability in 1) NDE tests and calibration procedures, 2) operator variance, and 3) the influence of human factors on the application of the NDE inspection processes.","PeriodicalId":367504,"journal":{"name":"ASNT 30th Research Symposium Conference Proceedings","volume":"126 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Quantitative Assessment of Historical Nondestructive Evaluation (NDE) Probability of Detection (POD) Data for Railroad Tank Cars\",\"authors\":\"Anish Poudel, Silvia Galván-Núñez, Brian Lindeman, Fancisco Gonzalez\",\"doi\":\"10.32548/rs.2022.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper discusses a comprehensive analysis and quantitative assessment of two decades of nondestructive evaluation probability of detection (NDE POD) data collected using the Code of Federal Regulations’ (CFR)-approved NDE methods for railroad tank cars. The results obtained from this research demonstrate that these methods were not capable of achieving or approaching a 90-percent POD with 95-percent confidence (90/95 POD) for fatigue cracks in the butt weld (BW) test panels from the operators who participated in this research. The evaluation of the fillet weld (FW) data showed mixed results, but only the magnetic particle testing (MT) method reached 90/95 POD. Also, excessive false calls were observed in both the BW and the FW inspection results. These results indicate the variability in 1) NDE tests and calibration procedures, 2) operator variance, and 3) the influence of human factors on the application of the NDE inspection processes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":367504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ASNT 30th Research Symposium Conference Proceedings\",\"volume\":\"126 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ASNT 30th Research Symposium Conference Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32548/rs.2022.018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASNT 30th Research Symposium Conference Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32548/rs.2022.018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了采用联邦法规(CFR)批准的铁路罐车无损检测方法收集的二十年无损评估检测概率(NDE POD)数据的综合分析和定量评估。从这项研究中获得的结果表明,这些方法无法达到或接近90%的POD, 95%的置信度(90/95 POD)对于对接焊(BW)测试板的疲劳裂纹。对角焊缝(FW)数据的评价结果好坏参半,但只有磁粉检测(MT)方法的POD达到90/95。此外,在BW和FW检测结果中都观察到过多的误报。这些结果表明了以下方面的可变性:1)无损检验和校准程序;2)操作人员方差;3)人为因素对无损检验过程应用的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Quantitative Assessment of Historical Nondestructive Evaluation (NDE) Probability of Detection (POD) Data for Railroad Tank Cars
This paper discusses a comprehensive analysis and quantitative assessment of two decades of nondestructive evaluation probability of detection (NDE POD) data collected using the Code of Federal Regulations’ (CFR)-approved NDE methods for railroad tank cars. The results obtained from this research demonstrate that these methods were not capable of achieving or approaching a 90-percent POD with 95-percent confidence (90/95 POD) for fatigue cracks in the butt weld (BW) test panels from the operators who participated in this research. The evaluation of the fillet weld (FW) data showed mixed results, but only the magnetic particle testing (MT) method reached 90/95 POD. Also, excessive false calls were observed in both the BW and the FW inspection results. These results indicate the variability in 1) NDE tests and calibration procedures, 2) operator variance, and 3) the influence of human factors on the application of the NDE inspection processes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信