利用创新科学将创业风险降至最低

Joseph S. Nadan
{"title":"利用创新科学将创业风险降至最低","authors":"Joseph S. Nadan","doi":"10.1109/INNOTEK.2014.6877372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most universities today encourage their students to experience entrepreneurial activities such as workshops, boot camps, internships, pitch events, competitions, and startups. Although these activities are extremely popular, the resultant startups have very low success rates - typically less than 2%. This situation may be improved by enhancing competencies in both the art and science of innovation such that students will “succeed sooner” rather than “failing fast.” The results of a 2013 survey are presented revealing a large gap between perceived and actual competencies in innovation; and, that less than half of the participants had the innovation skills necessary to have a reasonable chance of being successful in an entrepreneurial activity. What competencies they had were skewed toward the art rather than the science of innovation, a system-level science that studies the behavior of complex systems that are multidisciplinary often including engineering, technology, design and business. Three innovation science methods (Outcome Driven Innovation, I.D.E.A.S! brainstorming and Mind Genomics) illustrate both why innovation is a science and how it may be applied to minimize the risk of entrepreneurship. The paper concludes with a forward-looking overview of the International Association of Innovation Professionals (IAOIP), a global organization that is supporting and certifying innovation professionals, that was founded in January 2013 by the senior editors of the International Journal of Innovation Science (IJIS) now in its sixth year of publication.","PeriodicalId":217120,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE Innovations in Technology Conference","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using innovation science to minimize entrepreneurial risk\",\"authors\":\"Joseph S. Nadan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/INNOTEK.2014.6877372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Most universities today encourage their students to experience entrepreneurial activities such as workshops, boot camps, internships, pitch events, competitions, and startups. Although these activities are extremely popular, the resultant startups have very low success rates - typically less than 2%. This situation may be improved by enhancing competencies in both the art and science of innovation such that students will “succeed sooner” rather than “failing fast.” The results of a 2013 survey are presented revealing a large gap between perceived and actual competencies in innovation; and, that less than half of the participants had the innovation skills necessary to have a reasonable chance of being successful in an entrepreneurial activity. What competencies they had were skewed toward the art rather than the science of innovation, a system-level science that studies the behavior of complex systems that are multidisciplinary often including engineering, technology, design and business. Three innovation science methods (Outcome Driven Innovation, I.D.E.A.S! brainstorming and Mind Genomics) illustrate both why innovation is a science and how it may be applied to minimize the risk of entrepreneurship. The paper concludes with a forward-looking overview of the International Association of Innovation Professionals (IAOIP), a global organization that is supporting and certifying innovation professionals, that was founded in January 2013 by the senior editors of the International Journal of Innovation Science (IJIS) now in its sixth year of publication.\",\"PeriodicalId\":217120,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 IEEE Innovations in Technology Conference\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 IEEE Innovations in Technology Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/INNOTEK.2014.6877372\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE Innovations in Technology Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INNOTEK.2014.6877372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

如今,大多数大学都鼓励学生参加创业活动,比如研讨会、新兵训练营、实习、推介活动、竞赛和创业。尽管这些活动非常受欢迎,但由此产生的创业成功率非常低——通常不到2%。这种情况可以通过提高创新的艺术和科学能力来改善,这样学生就会“更快成功”而不是“很快失败”。2013年的一项调查结果显示,创新能力的感知能力与实际能力之间存在巨大差距;而且,只有不到一半的参与者拥有在创业活动中获得成功的合理机会所必需的创新技能。他们的能力倾向于艺术,而不是创新科学,这是一门研究复杂系统行为的系统级科学,通常包括工程、技术、设计和商业等多学科。三种创新科学方法(结果驱动型创新,ide.a.s !头脑风暴和心智基因组学)既说明了为什么创新是一门科学,也说明了如何将创新应用于将创业风险降至最低。本文最后对国际创新专业人员协会(IAOIP)进行了前瞻性的概述,该协会是一个支持和认证创新专业人员的全球性组织,由国际创新科学杂志(IJIS)的高级编辑于2013年1月成立,目前已出版六年。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using innovation science to minimize entrepreneurial risk
Most universities today encourage their students to experience entrepreneurial activities such as workshops, boot camps, internships, pitch events, competitions, and startups. Although these activities are extremely popular, the resultant startups have very low success rates - typically less than 2%. This situation may be improved by enhancing competencies in both the art and science of innovation such that students will “succeed sooner” rather than “failing fast.” The results of a 2013 survey are presented revealing a large gap between perceived and actual competencies in innovation; and, that less than half of the participants had the innovation skills necessary to have a reasonable chance of being successful in an entrepreneurial activity. What competencies they had were skewed toward the art rather than the science of innovation, a system-level science that studies the behavior of complex systems that are multidisciplinary often including engineering, technology, design and business. Three innovation science methods (Outcome Driven Innovation, I.D.E.A.S! brainstorming and Mind Genomics) illustrate both why innovation is a science and how it may be applied to minimize the risk of entrepreneurship. The paper concludes with a forward-looking overview of the International Association of Innovation Professionals (IAOIP), a global organization that is supporting and certifying innovation professionals, that was founded in January 2013 by the senior editors of the International Journal of Innovation Science (IJIS) now in its sixth year of publication.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信