皮影戏:在新视觉无性恋

Kari Barclay
{"title":"皮影戏:在新视觉无性恋","authors":"Kari Barclay","doi":"10.1353/tt.2023.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Asexuality—the perspective of not experiencing sexual attraction to others—is sometimes called the “invisible orientation” for its lack of representation in popular culture (Decker). Popularized in the early 2000s, the term “asexual” describes a spectrum of non-normative desire and is usually presented as a sexual orientation akin to “heterosexual,” “bisexual,” or “homosexual.” While framed as an essential, minority identity, asexuality can also describe a sensibility akin to queerness. Within the past few years, television series such as BoJack Horseman, Sex Education, Sirens, and Everything’s Gonna Be Okay have all spotlighted asexual characters. In theatre, however, asexual representation has remained rare. Being one of a few out asexual playwrights, I have stumbled upon pockets of asexual theatre-makers, often by chance, as colleagues have connected via social media or word of mouth through mutual friends. I have noticed (and been part of ) a cohort of artists working to tell stories of asexual experience and shift social understandings of what constitutes “natural” sexuality. Here, I spotlight a sample of plays from this cohort to investigate what asexual aesthetics and representation might lend to theatrical discourse more broadly.","PeriodicalId":209215,"journal":{"name":"Theatre Topics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shadow Play: Visualizing Asexuality in New\",\"authors\":\"Kari Barclay\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/tt.2023.0008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Asexuality—the perspective of not experiencing sexual attraction to others—is sometimes called the “invisible orientation” for its lack of representation in popular culture (Decker). Popularized in the early 2000s, the term “asexual” describes a spectrum of non-normative desire and is usually presented as a sexual orientation akin to “heterosexual,” “bisexual,” or “homosexual.” While framed as an essential, minority identity, asexuality can also describe a sensibility akin to queerness. Within the past few years, television series such as BoJack Horseman, Sex Education, Sirens, and Everything’s Gonna Be Okay have all spotlighted asexual characters. In theatre, however, asexual representation has remained rare. Being one of a few out asexual playwrights, I have stumbled upon pockets of asexual theatre-makers, often by chance, as colleagues have connected via social media or word of mouth through mutual friends. I have noticed (and been part of ) a cohort of artists working to tell stories of asexual experience and shift social understandings of what constitutes “natural” sexuality. Here, I spotlight a sample of plays from this cohort to investigate what asexual aesthetics and representation might lend to theatrical discourse more broadly.\",\"PeriodicalId\":209215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theatre Topics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theatre Topics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/tt.2023.0008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theatre Topics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tt.2023.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

无性恋——对他人没有性吸引力的观点——有时被称为“看不见的取向”,因为它在流行文化中缺乏代表性(Decker)。“无性恋”一词在21世纪初流行起来,它描述了一系列不规范的欲望,通常被描述为一种性取向,类似于“异性恋”、“双性恋”或“同性恋”。虽然无性恋被定义为一种基本的少数群体身份,但它也可以描述一种类似于酷儿的情感。在过去的几年里,诸如《马男波杰克》、《性教育》、《塞壬》和《一切都会好起来》等电视剧都聚焦于无性恋角色。然而,在戏剧中,无性表现仍然很少见。作为少数出柜的无性恋剧作家之一,我经常偶然发现一些无性恋剧作家,因为同事们通过社交媒体或共同朋友的口口相传联系在一起。我注意到(并且是其中的一员)一群艺术家致力于讲述无性体验的故事,并改变社会对什么是“自然”性行为的理解。在这里,我从这个群体中选取了一个戏剧样本来研究无性美学和表现可能对戏剧话语产生的更广泛的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Shadow Play: Visualizing Asexuality in New
Asexuality—the perspective of not experiencing sexual attraction to others—is sometimes called the “invisible orientation” for its lack of representation in popular culture (Decker). Popularized in the early 2000s, the term “asexual” describes a spectrum of non-normative desire and is usually presented as a sexual orientation akin to “heterosexual,” “bisexual,” or “homosexual.” While framed as an essential, minority identity, asexuality can also describe a sensibility akin to queerness. Within the past few years, television series such as BoJack Horseman, Sex Education, Sirens, and Everything’s Gonna Be Okay have all spotlighted asexual characters. In theatre, however, asexual representation has remained rare. Being one of a few out asexual playwrights, I have stumbled upon pockets of asexual theatre-makers, often by chance, as colleagues have connected via social media or word of mouth through mutual friends. I have noticed (and been part of ) a cohort of artists working to tell stories of asexual experience and shift social understandings of what constitutes “natural” sexuality. Here, I spotlight a sample of plays from this cohort to investigate what asexual aesthetics and representation might lend to theatrical discourse more broadly.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信