知识管理系统(KMS)准备水平基于小组专业领域,以提高科学教育和计算机科学质量(交叉施肥原则)(案例研究:计算机科学计划课程FPMIPA UPI)

R. R. J. Putra, B. L. Putro
{"title":"知识管理系统(KMS)准备水平基于小组专业领域,以提高科学教育和计算机科学质量(交叉施肥原则)(案例研究:计算机科学计划课程FPMIPA UPI)","authors":"R. R. J. Putra, B. L. Putro","doi":"10.1109/ICSITECH.2017.8257203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Computer Science Education courses concentrate on the scientific education of computer science, while the Computer Science Program concentrates on computer science. Both of these study programs have a close relationship to complement and improve each other in the domain of science and education in the field of computer science (cross-fertilization principle). Knowledge management nowadays is still in concept level that hard to implement and still requires exploration and improvement to develop. Failure level in implementation of Knowledge Management System (KMS) high enough that should be measured with KMS Readiness Levels. This research uses analytical hierarchy process (AHP) weighting method and Aydin/Tasci scales to find out the research objective which is priority weighting from each of concepts that has been studied and to find out readiness category based on Aydin/Tasci Scale. The initial phase is to design a scale of measurement using AHP method with normalization weight and priority values as final results the next phase is to analyze the processing values using Aydin/Tasci Scale to see readiness scale of knowledge management system in computer science program. As measured from the readiness level of KMS are knowledge manager, technology and culture. Based on that, AHP weight values for each concept which chosen for this KMS readiness research in Computer Science Program. The highest score is 3.176 from culture dimension. Average value KMS readiness in Computer Science Program is 2,863 which means Computer Science Program is not ready yet for KMS implementation.","PeriodicalId":165045,"journal":{"name":"2017 3rd International Conference on Science in Information Technology (ICSITech)","volume":"90 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowledge Management System (KMS) readiness level based on group areas of expertise to improve science education and computer science quality (cross-fertilization principle) (Case study: Computer science program course FPMIPA UPI)\",\"authors\":\"R. R. J. Putra, B. L. Putro\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICSITECH.2017.8257203\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Computer Science Education courses concentrate on the scientific education of computer science, while the Computer Science Program concentrates on computer science. Both of these study programs have a close relationship to complement and improve each other in the domain of science and education in the field of computer science (cross-fertilization principle). Knowledge management nowadays is still in concept level that hard to implement and still requires exploration and improvement to develop. Failure level in implementation of Knowledge Management System (KMS) high enough that should be measured with KMS Readiness Levels. This research uses analytical hierarchy process (AHP) weighting method and Aydin/Tasci scales to find out the research objective which is priority weighting from each of concepts that has been studied and to find out readiness category based on Aydin/Tasci Scale. The initial phase is to design a scale of measurement using AHP method with normalization weight and priority values as final results the next phase is to analyze the processing values using Aydin/Tasci Scale to see readiness scale of knowledge management system in computer science program. As measured from the readiness level of KMS are knowledge manager, technology and culture. Based on that, AHP weight values for each concept which chosen for this KMS readiness research in Computer Science Program. The highest score is 3.176 from culture dimension. Average value KMS readiness in Computer Science Program is 2,863 which means Computer Science Program is not ready yet for KMS implementation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":165045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 3rd International Conference on Science in Information Technology (ICSITech)\",\"volume\":\"90 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 3rd International Conference on Science in Information Technology (ICSITech)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSITECH.2017.8257203\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 3rd International Conference on Science in Information Technology (ICSITech)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSITECH.2017.8257203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

计算机科学教育课程侧重于计算机科学的科学教育,而计算机科学专业则侧重于计算机科学。这两个研究项目在计算机科学领域的科学和教育领域有着密切的联系,相互补充和提高(交叉受精原理)。知识管理目前还停留在概念层面,实施起来比较困难,发展起来还需要探索和改进。知识管理系统(KMS)实施的失败程度足够高,应以知识管理系统就绪水平来衡量。本研究采用层次分析法(AHP)加权法和Aydin/Tasci量表,从所研究的每个概念中找出研究目标即优先级加权,并根据Aydin/Tasci量表找出准备程度类别。第一阶段是采用层次分析法设计测量量表,以归一化权重值和优先级值作为最终结果;第二阶段是采用Aydin/Tasci量表分析处理值,得出计算机科学项目知识管理系统的准备程度。从知识管理系统的准备程度来衡量,包括知识管理、技术和文化。在此基础上,对本次计算机科学专业知识管理成熟度研究所选择的各个概念进行了AHP加权。文化维度得分最高,为3.176分。计算机科学专业的知识管理就绪度平均值为2,863,这意味着计算机科学专业尚未为知识管理系统的实施做好准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Knowledge Management System (KMS) readiness level based on group areas of expertise to improve science education and computer science quality (cross-fertilization principle) (Case study: Computer science program course FPMIPA UPI)
Computer Science Education courses concentrate on the scientific education of computer science, while the Computer Science Program concentrates on computer science. Both of these study programs have a close relationship to complement and improve each other in the domain of science and education in the field of computer science (cross-fertilization principle). Knowledge management nowadays is still in concept level that hard to implement and still requires exploration and improvement to develop. Failure level in implementation of Knowledge Management System (KMS) high enough that should be measured with KMS Readiness Levels. This research uses analytical hierarchy process (AHP) weighting method and Aydin/Tasci scales to find out the research objective which is priority weighting from each of concepts that has been studied and to find out readiness category based on Aydin/Tasci Scale. The initial phase is to design a scale of measurement using AHP method with normalization weight and priority values as final results the next phase is to analyze the processing values using Aydin/Tasci Scale to see readiness scale of knowledge management system in computer science program. As measured from the readiness level of KMS are knowledge manager, technology and culture. Based on that, AHP weight values for each concept which chosen for this KMS readiness research in Computer Science Program. The highest score is 3.176 from culture dimension. Average value KMS readiness in Computer Science Program is 2,863 which means Computer Science Program is not ready yet for KMS implementation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信