{"title":"痛苦是证据吗?颈动脉夹层患者随访时头颈疼痛与血管病理的关系:回顾性数据分析","authors":"J. Baumann, Miranda Stattmann, S. Wegener","doi":"10.3390/ctn7020015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Unilateral head and neck pain is a hallmark of cervical artery dissection (CAD). While pain is conceived as an alarming sign for patients and often leads to discovery of the dissection, it is not known if persistence of pain is associated with the course of CAD. Potentially, pain could indicate persisting vessel pathology and thus guide treatment decisions aimed at reducing risk of ischemic stroke in CAD. We performed a retrospective analysis of data from patients with CAD treated at the University Hospital Zurich (USZ). Only patients with information about the presence of pain, independence after CAD according to the modified Rankin scale (mRS), and imaging-based information on vessel status were included. Patients were grouped according to presence/absence of head and/or neck pain on admission and at a three-month follow-up. We used descriptive statistics and logistic regression to reveal a potential association between pain on admission and pain at follow-up with status of the dissected vessel at follow-up (open vs. stenosed or occluded). We screened 139 patients with CAD between 2014 and 2019 and included 68. Fifty-nine patients (86.8%) had pain on admission, which was resolved in 46 (68%) at follow-up. Our post hoc analysis revealed that more patients with headache or neck pain on admission had a migraine diagnosis in medical history (n = 7 (10.4%) vs. n = 0 (0%), p = 0.029) and that NIHSS on admission was higher in patients with no pain at presentation (group B NIHSS = 3, IQR 8 vs. group A NIHSS = 2, IQR 5, group C NIHSS = 0, IQR 2, p = 0.041). There were no other differences between the three patient groups in the descriptive analysis. Logistic regression analysis for vessel status at follow-up did not show an association with pain on admission or at follow-up. In our cohort of patients with CAD, headache was a common initial clinical presentation, which rarely persisted for three months. Headache on admission or at follow-up did not predict persisting vessel pathology in patients with CAD.","PeriodicalId":242430,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Neuroscience","volume":"160 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is the Proof in the Pain? Association between Head and Neck Pain and Vessel Pathology at Follow-Up in Cervical Artery Dissection: A Retrospective Data Analysis\",\"authors\":\"J. Baumann, Miranda Stattmann, S. Wegener\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/ctn7020015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Unilateral head and neck pain is a hallmark of cervical artery dissection (CAD). While pain is conceived as an alarming sign for patients and often leads to discovery of the dissection, it is not known if persistence of pain is associated with the course of CAD. Potentially, pain could indicate persisting vessel pathology and thus guide treatment decisions aimed at reducing risk of ischemic stroke in CAD. We performed a retrospective analysis of data from patients with CAD treated at the University Hospital Zurich (USZ). Only patients with information about the presence of pain, independence after CAD according to the modified Rankin scale (mRS), and imaging-based information on vessel status were included. Patients were grouped according to presence/absence of head and/or neck pain on admission and at a three-month follow-up. We used descriptive statistics and logistic regression to reveal a potential association between pain on admission and pain at follow-up with status of the dissected vessel at follow-up (open vs. stenosed or occluded). We screened 139 patients with CAD between 2014 and 2019 and included 68. Fifty-nine patients (86.8%) had pain on admission, which was resolved in 46 (68%) at follow-up. Our post hoc analysis revealed that more patients with headache or neck pain on admission had a migraine diagnosis in medical history (n = 7 (10.4%) vs. n = 0 (0%), p = 0.029) and that NIHSS on admission was higher in patients with no pain at presentation (group B NIHSS = 3, IQR 8 vs. group A NIHSS = 2, IQR 5, group C NIHSS = 0, IQR 2, p = 0.041). There were no other differences between the three patient groups in the descriptive analysis. Logistic regression analysis for vessel status at follow-up did not show an association with pain on admission or at follow-up. In our cohort of patients with CAD, headache was a common initial clinical presentation, which rarely persisted for three months. Headache on admission or at follow-up did not predict persisting vessel pathology in patients with CAD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":242430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Translational Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"160 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Translational Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/ctn7020015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ctn7020015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Is the Proof in the Pain? Association between Head and Neck Pain and Vessel Pathology at Follow-Up in Cervical Artery Dissection: A Retrospective Data Analysis
Unilateral head and neck pain is a hallmark of cervical artery dissection (CAD). While pain is conceived as an alarming sign for patients and often leads to discovery of the dissection, it is not known if persistence of pain is associated with the course of CAD. Potentially, pain could indicate persisting vessel pathology and thus guide treatment decisions aimed at reducing risk of ischemic stroke in CAD. We performed a retrospective analysis of data from patients with CAD treated at the University Hospital Zurich (USZ). Only patients with information about the presence of pain, independence after CAD according to the modified Rankin scale (mRS), and imaging-based information on vessel status were included. Patients were grouped according to presence/absence of head and/or neck pain on admission and at a three-month follow-up. We used descriptive statistics and logistic regression to reveal a potential association between pain on admission and pain at follow-up with status of the dissected vessel at follow-up (open vs. stenosed or occluded). We screened 139 patients with CAD between 2014 and 2019 and included 68. Fifty-nine patients (86.8%) had pain on admission, which was resolved in 46 (68%) at follow-up. Our post hoc analysis revealed that more patients with headache or neck pain on admission had a migraine diagnosis in medical history (n = 7 (10.4%) vs. n = 0 (0%), p = 0.029) and that NIHSS on admission was higher in patients with no pain at presentation (group B NIHSS = 3, IQR 8 vs. group A NIHSS = 2, IQR 5, group C NIHSS = 0, IQR 2, p = 0.041). There were no other differences between the three patient groups in the descriptive analysis. Logistic regression analysis for vessel status at follow-up did not show an association with pain on admission or at follow-up. In our cohort of patients with CAD, headache was a common initial clinical presentation, which rarely persisted for three months. Headache on admission or at follow-up did not predict persisting vessel pathology in patients with CAD.