痛苦是证据吗?颈动脉夹层患者随访时头颈疼痛与血管病理的关系:回顾性数据分析

J. Baumann, Miranda Stattmann, S. Wegener
{"title":"痛苦是证据吗?颈动脉夹层患者随访时头颈疼痛与血管病理的关系:回顾性数据分析","authors":"J. Baumann, Miranda Stattmann, S. Wegener","doi":"10.3390/ctn7020015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Unilateral head and neck pain is a hallmark of cervical artery dissection (CAD). While pain is conceived as an alarming sign for patients and often leads to discovery of the dissection, it is not known if persistence of pain is associated with the course of CAD. Potentially, pain could indicate persisting vessel pathology and thus guide treatment decisions aimed at reducing risk of ischemic stroke in CAD. We performed a retrospective analysis of data from patients with CAD treated at the University Hospital Zurich (USZ). Only patients with information about the presence of pain, independence after CAD according to the modified Rankin scale (mRS), and imaging-based information on vessel status were included. Patients were grouped according to presence/absence of head and/or neck pain on admission and at a three-month follow-up. We used descriptive statistics and logistic regression to reveal a potential association between pain on admission and pain at follow-up with status of the dissected vessel at follow-up (open vs. stenosed or occluded). We screened 139 patients with CAD between 2014 and 2019 and included 68. Fifty-nine patients (86.8%) had pain on admission, which was resolved in 46 (68%) at follow-up. Our post hoc analysis revealed that more patients with headache or neck pain on admission had a migraine diagnosis in medical history (n = 7 (10.4%) vs. n = 0 (0%), p = 0.029) and that NIHSS on admission was higher in patients with no pain at presentation (group B NIHSS = 3, IQR 8 vs. group A NIHSS = 2, IQR 5, group C NIHSS = 0, IQR 2, p = 0.041). There were no other differences between the three patient groups in the descriptive analysis. Logistic regression analysis for vessel status at follow-up did not show an association with pain on admission or at follow-up. In our cohort of patients with CAD, headache was a common initial clinical presentation, which rarely persisted for three months. Headache on admission or at follow-up did not predict persisting vessel pathology in patients with CAD.","PeriodicalId":242430,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Neuroscience","volume":"160 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is the Proof in the Pain? Association between Head and Neck Pain and Vessel Pathology at Follow-Up in Cervical Artery Dissection: A Retrospective Data Analysis\",\"authors\":\"J. Baumann, Miranda Stattmann, S. Wegener\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/ctn7020015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Unilateral head and neck pain is a hallmark of cervical artery dissection (CAD). While pain is conceived as an alarming sign for patients and often leads to discovery of the dissection, it is not known if persistence of pain is associated with the course of CAD. Potentially, pain could indicate persisting vessel pathology and thus guide treatment decisions aimed at reducing risk of ischemic stroke in CAD. We performed a retrospective analysis of data from patients with CAD treated at the University Hospital Zurich (USZ). Only patients with information about the presence of pain, independence after CAD according to the modified Rankin scale (mRS), and imaging-based information on vessel status were included. Patients were grouped according to presence/absence of head and/or neck pain on admission and at a three-month follow-up. We used descriptive statistics and logistic regression to reveal a potential association between pain on admission and pain at follow-up with status of the dissected vessel at follow-up (open vs. stenosed or occluded). We screened 139 patients with CAD between 2014 and 2019 and included 68. Fifty-nine patients (86.8%) had pain on admission, which was resolved in 46 (68%) at follow-up. Our post hoc analysis revealed that more patients with headache or neck pain on admission had a migraine diagnosis in medical history (n = 7 (10.4%) vs. n = 0 (0%), p = 0.029) and that NIHSS on admission was higher in patients with no pain at presentation (group B NIHSS = 3, IQR 8 vs. group A NIHSS = 2, IQR 5, group C NIHSS = 0, IQR 2, p = 0.041). There were no other differences between the three patient groups in the descriptive analysis. Logistic regression analysis for vessel status at follow-up did not show an association with pain on admission or at follow-up. In our cohort of patients with CAD, headache was a common initial clinical presentation, which rarely persisted for three months. Headache on admission or at follow-up did not predict persisting vessel pathology in patients with CAD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":242430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Translational Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"160 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Translational Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/ctn7020015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ctn7020015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

单侧头颈部疼痛是颈动脉夹层(CAD)的标志。虽然疼痛被认为是患者的一个警示信号,经常导致发现夹层,但目前尚不清楚疼痛的持续是否与CAD的病程有关。潜在地,疼痛可能表明持续的血管病理,从而指导旨在降低冠心病缺血性卒中风险的治疗决策。我们对在苏黎世大学医院(USZ)治疗的CAD患者的数据进行了回顾性分析。根据改良Rankin量表(mRS),仅纳入有疼痛存在信息、CAD后独立性信息和基于图像的血管状态信息的患者。患者根据入院时头部和/或颈部疼痛的存在与否和三个月的随访进行分组。我们使用描述性统计和逻辑回归来揭示入院时疼痛和随访时疼痛与随访时解剖血管状态(开放、狭窄或闭塞)之间的潜在关联。我们在2014年至2019年期间筛选了139例CAD患者,其中包括68例。59例(86.8%)患者入院时疼痛,46例(68%)患者随访时疼痛缓解。我们的事后分析显示,入院时头痛或颈部疼痛的患者在病史中有偏头痛诊断的患者较多(n = 7(10.4%)比n = 0 (0%), p = 0.029),入院时无疼痛的患者NIHSS较高(B组NIHSS = 3, IQR 8, a组NIHSS = 2, IQR 5, C组NIHSS = 0, IQR 2, p = 0.041)。在描述性分析中,三组患者之间没有其他差异。随访时血管状态的Logistic回归分析未显示入院或随访时疼痛的相关性。在我们的冠心病患者队列中,头痛是常见的初始临床表现,很少持续三个月。入院时或随访时的头痛并不能预测冠心病患者持续的血管病理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is the Proof in the Pain? Association between Head and Neck Pain and Vessel Pathology at Follow-Up in Cervical Artery Dissection: A Retrospective Data Analysis
Unilateral head and neck pain is a hallmark of cervical artery dissection (CAD). While pain is conceived as an alarming sign for patients and often leads to discovery of the dissection, it is not known if persistence of pain is associated with the course of CAD. Potentially, pain could indicate persisting vessel pathology and thus guide treatment decisions aimed at reducing risk of ischemic stroke in CAD. We performed a retrospective analysis of data from patients with CAD treated at the University Hospital Zurich (USZ). Only patients with information about the presence of pain, independence after CAD according to the modified Rankin scale (mRS), and imaging-based information on vessel status were included. Patients were grouped according to presence/absence of head and/or neck pain on admission and at a three-month follow-up. We used descriptive statistics and logistic regression to reveal a potential association between pain on admission and pain at follow-up with status of the dissected vessel at follow-up (open vs. stenosed or occluded). We screened 139 patients with CAD between 2014 and 2019 and included 68. Fifty-nine patients (86.8%) had pain on admission, which was resolved in 46 (68%) at follow-up. Our post hoc analysis revealed that more patients with headache or neck pain on admission had a migraine diagnosis in medical history (n = 7 (10.4%) vs. n = 0 (0%), p = 0.029) and that NIHSS on admission was higher in patients with no pain at presentation (group B NIHSS = 3, IQR 8 vs. group A NIHSS = 2, IQR 5, group C NIHSS = 0, IQR 2, p = 0.041). There were no other differences between the three patient groups in the descriptive analysis. Logistic regression analysis for vessel status at follow-up did not show an association with pain on admission or at follow-up. In our cohort of patients with CAD, headache was a common initial clinical presentation, which rarely persisted for three months. Headache on admission or at follow-up did not predict persisting vessel pathology in patients with CAD.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信