原发性治疗在卵巢癌自然史中的预后作用:一项初步研究

A. Perrone, M. Tesei, E. De Crescenzo, C. Coadă, A. Bovicelli, S. Boussedra, S. Dondi, G. Giunchi, P. De Iaco
{"title":"原发性治疗在卵巢癌自然史中的预后作用:一项初步研究","authors":"A. Perrone, M. Tesei, E. De Crescenzo, C. Coadă, A. Bovicelli, S. Boussedra, S. Dondi, G. Giunchi, P. De Iaco","doi":"10.48286/aro.2021.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Epithelial Ovarian cancer is the most lethal and silent gynaecological tumor and relapses in about 75% of cases. Retrospective data supported the superiority of secondary cytoreduction surgery (SCS) plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone; in order to best select patients for SCS literature established a clinical score based on ascites, performance status, and absence of residual disease to primary surgery. The present study analyzed the outcomes and pattern of relapse of a population with first relapse of ovarian cancer undergoing secondary surgery without residual tumor divided into two groups based on the type of treatment at the first diagnosis (primary debulking surgery [PDS] or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery [IDS]). This is an observational retrospective study carried out at the referred Centre of Oncologic Gynaecology of Bologna, Italy on patients who underwent SCS for ovarian cancer between January 2009 and December 2019 retrieved in an electronic data1 Division of Oncologic Gynaecology, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy 2 Center for Applied Biomedical Research, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy 3 University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:","PeriodicalId":148778,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Research in Oncology","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PROGNOSTIC ROLE OF THE PRIMARY TREATMENT IN THE NATURAL HISTORY OF OVARIAN CANCER: A PILOT STUDY\",\"authors\":\"A. Perrone, M. Tesei, E. De Crescenzo, C. Coadă, A. Bovicelli, S. Boussedra, S. Dondi, G. Giunchi, P. De Iaco\",\"doi\":\"10.48286/aro.2021.13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Epithelial Ovarian cancer is the most lethal and silent gynaecological tumor and relapses in about 75% of cases. Retrospective data supported the superiority of secondary cytoreduction surgery (SCS) plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone; in order to best select patients for SCS literature established a clinical score based on ascites, performance status, and absence of residual disease to primary surgery. The present study analyzed the outcomes and pattern of relapse of a population with first relapse of ovarian cancer undergoing secondary surgery without residual tumor divided into two groups based on the type of treatment at the first diagnosis (primary debulking surgery [PDS] or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery [IDS]). This is an observational retrospective study carried out at the referred Centre of Oncologic Gynaecology of Bologna, Italy on patients who underwent SCS for ovarian cancer between January 2009 and December 2019 retrieved in an electronic data1 Division of Oncologic Gynaecology, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy 2 Center for Applied Biomedical Research, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy 3 University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:\",\"PeriodicalId\":148778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Research in Oncology\",\"volume\":\"85 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Research in Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48286/aro.2021.13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Research in Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48286/aro.2021.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

上皮性卵巢癌是最致命和沉默的妇科肿瘤,约75%的病例复发。回顾性数据支持二次细胞减少手术(SCS)加化疗优于单独化疗;为了最好地选择SCS患者,文献建立了一个基于腹水、功能状态和初级手术无残留疾病的临床评分。本研究分析了首次复发的无肿瘤残留的卵巢癌二次手术患者的预后和复发模式,根据首次诊断时的治疗方式分为两组(原发性减瘤手术[PDS]或新辅助化疗后间隔减瘤手术[IDS])。这是意大利博洛尼亚妇科肿瘤中心对2009年1月至2019年12月期间接受SCS治疗的卵巢癌患者进行的一项观察性回顾性研究,检索自电子数据1意大利博洛尼亚Azienda ospedaliero -博洛尼亚大学IRCCS肿瘤科2意大利博洛尼亚大学Alma Mater Studiorum应用生物医学研究中心3意大利博洛尼亚博洛尼亚大学通讯作者:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PROGNOSTIC ROLE OF THE PRIMARY TREATMENT IN THE NATURAL HISTORY OF OVARIAN CANCER: A PILOT STUDY
Epithelial Ovarian cancer is the most lethal and silent gynaecological tumor and relapses in about 75% of cases. Retrospective data supported the superiority of secondary cytoreduction surgery (SCS) plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone; in order to best select patients for SCS literature established a clinical score based on ascites, performance status, and absence of residual disease to primary surgery. The present study analyzed the outcomes and pattern of relapse of a population with first relapse of ovarian cancer undergoing secondary surgery without residual tumor divided into two groups based on the type of treatment at the first diagnosis (primary debulking surgery [PDS] or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery [IDS]). This is an observational retrospective study carried out at the referred Centre of Oncologic Gynaecology of Bologna, Italy on patients who underwent SCS for ovarian cancer between January 2009 and December 2019 retrieved in an electronic data1 Division of Oncologic Gynaecology, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy 2 Center for Applied Biomedical Research, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy 3 University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信