{"title":"我们都必须是“左派”吗?","authors":"Øivind Varkøy, Petter Dyndahl","doi":"10.23865/nrme.v3.3697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, the tension between diversity and uniformity in our music education research communities is discussed as it relates to Thomas Piketty’s research on elites and shifting political leanings, Francis Fukuyama’s and Judith Butler’s reflections on identity politics, and Chantal Mouffe’s critical discussion of an antagonistic way of thinking, in which opponents are not defined politically but, rather, morally. We must establish an agonistic public sphere, Mouffe argues, a political sphere characterised by fights in which different political projects confront one another, accepting the fact that identity is relational. The article is the result of a series of ongoing dialogues between the authors and offered as an attempt at agonistic turn-taking that clearly identifies the two voices involved and their respective views.","PeriodicalId":322234,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Research in Music Education","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do we all have to be “leftists”?\",\"authors\":\"Øivind Varkøy, Petter Dyndahl\",\"doi\":\"10.23865/nrme.v3.3697\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, the tension between diversity and uniformity in our music education research communities is discussed as it relates to Thomas Piketty’s research on elites and shifting political leanings, Francis Fukuyama’s and Judith Butler’s reflections on identity politics, and Chantal Mouffe’s critical discussion of an antagonistic way of thinking, in which opponents are not defined politically but, rather, morally. We must establish an agonistic public sphere, Mouffe argues, a political sphere characterised by fights in which different political projects confront one another, accepting the fact that identity is relational. The article is the result of a series of ongoing dialogues between the authors and offered as an attempt at agonistic turn-taking that clearly identifies the two voices involved and their respective views.\",\"PeriodicalId\":322234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nordic Research in Music Education\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nordic Research in Music Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23865/nrme.v3.3697\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Research in Music Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23865/nrme.v3.3697","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
In this article, the tension between diversity and uniformity in our music education research communities is discussed as it relates to Thomas Piketty’s research on elites and shifting political leanings, Francis Fukuyama’s and Judith Butler’s reflections on identity politics, and Chantal Mouffe’s critical discussion of an antagonistic way of thinking, in which opponents are not defined politically but, rather, morally. We must establish an agonistic public sphere, Mouffe argues, a political sphere characterised by fights in which different political projects confront one another, accepting the fact that identity is relational. The article is the result of a series of ongoing dialogues between the authors and offered as an attempt at agonistic turn-taking that clearly identifies the two voices involved and their respective views.