{"title":"基于平均进位链长度的纹波进位加法器平均能耗估算","authors":"K. Parhi, Janardhan H. SatyanarayanaDepartment","doi":"10.1109/VLSISP.1996.558326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We show theoretically that the average energy consumption of a ripple-carry adder is O(W), and the upper bound on the average energy consumption is O(Wlog/sub 2/W), where W is the word-length of the operands. Our theoretical analysis is based on a simple state transition diagram (STD) model of a full adder cell and the observations that the average length of a carry propagation chain is v=2, and the average length of the maximum carry chain is v/spl les/log/sub 2/W. To verify our theoretical conclusions, we use the HEAT CAD tool to estimate the average power consumed by the ripple-carry adder for word-lengths 4/spl les/W/spl les/64. The experimental results show that, for W/spl ges/16, the error in our theoretical estimations is around 15%.","PeriodicalId":290885,"journal":{"name":"VLSI Signal Processing, IX","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimation of average energy consumption of ripple-carry adder based on average length carry chains\",\"authors\":\"K. Parhi, Janardhan H. SatyanarayanaDepartment\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/VLSISP.1996.558326\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We show theoretically that the average energy consumption of a ripple-carry adder is O(W), and the upper bound on the average energy consumption is O(Wlog/sub 2/W), where W is the word-length of the operands. Our theoretical analysis is based on a simple state transition diagram (STD) model of a full adder cell and the observations that the average length of a carry propagation chain is v=2, and the average length of the maximum carry chain is v/spl les/log/sub 2/W. To verify our theoretical conclusions, we use the HEAT CAD tool to estimate the average power consumed by the ripple-carry adder for word-lengths 4/spl les/W/spl les/64. The experimental results show that, for W/spl ges/16, the error in our theoretical estimations is around 15%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":290885,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"VLSI Signal Processing, IX\",\"volume\":\"93 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"VLSI Signal Processing, IX\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/VLSISP.1996.558326\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VLSI Signal Processing, IX","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/VLSISP.1996.558326","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Estimation of average energy consumption of ripple-carry adder based on average length carry chains
We show theoretically that the average energy consumption of a ripple-carry adder is O(W), and the upper bound on the average energy consumption is O(Wlog/sub 2/W), where W is the word-length of the operands. Our theoretical analysis is based on a simple state transition diagram (STD) model of a full adder cell and the observations that the average length of a carry propagation chain is v=2, and the average length of the maximum carry chain is v/spl les/log/sub 2/W. To verify our theoretical conclusions, we use the HEAT CAD tool to estimate the average power consumed by the ripple-carry adder for word-lengths 4/spl les/W/spl les/64. The experimental results show that, for W/spl ges/16, the error in our theoretical estimations is around 15%.