气道压力释放通气作为COVID-19患者的抢救通气策略

O. Mahmoud, D. Patadia, J. Salonia
{"title":"气道压力释放通气作为COVID-19患者的抢救通气策略","authors":"O. Mahmoud, D. Patadia, J. Salonia","doi":"10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2021.203.1_meetingabstracts.a2612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION Airway Pressure Release Ventilation (APRV) is a pressure controlled intermittent mandatory mode of ventilation characterized by inverse ratio ventilation and high mean airway pressure. Several studies have showed that APRV can improve oxygenation and lung recruitment in patients with ARDS. Although most patients with COVID-19 meet the Berlin criteria, hypoxic respiratory failure due to COVID-19 may differ from traditional ARDS as patients often present with severe, refractory hypoxemia and significant variation in respiratory system compliance. To date, no studies investigating APRV in this population have been published.The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of APRV as a rescue mode of ventilation in critically ill patients diagnosed with COVID-19 and refractory hypoxemia.METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients admitted with COVID-19 who developed refractory hypoxemia (PaO2/FIO2 ratio (P/F ratio) <200) while on mechanical ventilation and were treated with a trial of APRV for at least 8 hours. P/F ratio, ventilatory ratio and ventilation outputs before and during APRV were compared.Student's t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used to compare parametric and nonparametric data, respectively.RESULTS There were 60 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Mean age was 65, 36.6% of the patients were female and in-hospital mortality was 80%. We found that APRV significantly improved the P/F ratio (103 [75-154.23] vs 131.75 [94.15-221, p 0.0001]) and decreased the FiO2 requirements (80[60-100] vs 100[75-100], p 0.0034). PaCO2 (45.8 [41-56.75]mmHg vs 54[42-73]mmHg p 0.0051), and Ventilatory ratio (2.32 [1.92-3.15] vs 2.85 [2.07-3.85], p 0.0054) were also improved during the APRV trial. There was an increase in tidal volume per predicted body weight during APRV (7.86 [7.06-9.85] mL/Kg vs 6.58 [5.69-7.86] mL/Kg, p< 0.0001]) and a decrease in total minute ventilation (10.87±3.11 L/min vs 12.39±2.99 L/min, p 0.0005). On multivariate analysis, higher I:E and airway pressure were associated with greater improvement of P/F ratio.CONCLUSION Patients with COVID-19 and severe hypoxemia have a high in-hospital mortality.APRV may benefit these patients as it maximizes alveolar recruitment resulting in improved oxygenation, alveolar ventilation and CO2 clearance.These effects are more pronounced for higher airway pressure and I:E ratio. APRV was associated with an increase in tidal volume.However, tidal volumes remained within the recommended limits of lung protective ventilation.This study contributes to the growing evidence on the positive effects of APRV on oxygenation and ventilation.Prospective studies are urgently needed to evaluate the potential benefits of APRV on clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19 and severe hypoxemia.","PeriodicalId":388725,"journal":{"name":"TP50. TP050 COVID: NONPULMONARY CRITICAL CARE, MECHANICAL VENTILATION, BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, AND EPI","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Airway Pressure Release Ventilation as a Rescue Ventilatory Strategy in COVID-19 Patients\",\"authors\":\"O. Mahmoud, D. Patadia, J. Salonia\",\"doi\":\"10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2021.203.1_meetingabstracts.a2612\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION Airway Pressure Release Ventilation (APRV) is a pressure controlled intermittent mandatory mode of ventilation characterized by inverse ratio ventilation and high mean airway pressure. Several studies have showed that APRV can improve oxygenation and lung recruitment in patients with ARDS. Although most patients with COVID-19 meet the Berlin criteria, hypoxic respiratory failure due to COVID-19 may differ from traditional ARDS as patients often present with severe, refractory hypoxemia and significant variation in respiratory system compliance. To date, no studies investigating APRV in this population have been published.The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of APRV as a rescue mode of ventilation in critically ill patients diagnosed with COVID-19 and refractory hypoxemia.METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients admitted with COVID-19 who developed refractory hypoxemia (PaO2/FIO2 ratio (P/F ratio) <200) while on mechanical ventilation and were treated with a trial of APRV for at least 8 hours. P/F ratio, ventilatory ratio and ventilation outputs before and during APRV were compared.Student's t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used to compare parametric and nonparametric data, respectively.RESULTS There were 60 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Mean age was 65, 36.6% of the patients were female and in-hospital mortality was 80%. We found that APRV significantly improved the P/F ratio (103 [75-154.23] vs 131.75 [94.15-221, p 0.0001]) and decreased the FiO2 requirements (80[60-100] vs 100[75-100], p 0.0034). PaCO2 (45.8 [41-56.75]mmHg vs 54[42-73]mmHg p 0.0051), and Ventilatory ratio (2.32 [1.92-3.15] vs 2.85 [2.07-3.85], p 0.0054) were also improved during the APRV trial. There was an increase in tidal volume per predicted body weight during APRV (7.86 [7.06-9.85] mL/Kg vs 6.58 [5.69-7.86] mL/Kg, p< 0.0001]) and a decrease in total minute ventilation (10.87±3.11 L/min vs 12.39±2.99 L/min, p 0.0005). On multivariate analysis, higher I:E and airway pressure were associated with greater improvement of P/F ratio.CONCLUSION Patients with COVID-19 and severe hypoxemia have a high in-hospital mortality.APRV may benefit these patients as it maximizes alveolar recruitment resulting in improved oxygenation, alveolar ventilation and CO2 clearance.These effects are more pronounced for higher airway pressure and I:E ratio. APRV was associated with an increase in tidal volume.However, tidal volumes remained within the recommended limits of lung protective ventilation.This study contributes to the growing evidence on the positive effects of APRV on oxygenation and ventilation.Prospective studies are urgently needed to evaluate the potential benefits of APRV on clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19 and severe hypoxemia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":388725,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TP50. TP050 COVID: NONPULMONARY CRITICAL CARE, MECHANICAL VENTILATION, BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, AND EPI\",\"volume\":\"93 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TP50. TP050 COVID: NONPULMONARY CRITICAL CARE, MECHANICAL VENTILATION, BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, AND EPI\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2021.203.1_meetingabstracts.a2612\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TP50. TP050 COVID: NONPULMONARY CRITICAL CARE, MECHANICAL VENTILATION, BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, AND EPI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2021.203.1_meetingabstracts.a2612","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

气道压力释放通气(APRV)是一种压力控制的间歇强制通气方式,其特点是通气比为反比,平均气道压力较高。多项研究表明,APRV可以改善ARDS患者的氧合和肺补充。虽然大多数COVID-19患者符合柏林标准,但COVID-19引起的低氧性呼吸衰竭可能与传统的ARDS不同,因为患者通常表现为严重的难治性低氧血症和呼吸系统顺应性的显着变化。迄今为止,尚未发表调查该人群中APRV的研究。本研究的目的是评估APRV作为COVID-19合并难治性低氧血症危重患者通气抢救模式的有效性。方法回顾性分析入院的COVID-19患者在机械通气期间出现难治性低氧血症(PaO2/FIO2比率(P/F比率)<200),并接受APRV试验治疗至少8小时。比较APRV前后的P/F比、通风量和通风量。参数数据和非参数数据的比较分别采用学生t检验和Wilcoxon符号秩检验。结果60例患者符合纳入标准。平均年龄65岁,女性占36.6%,住院死亡率为80%。我们发现APRV显著提高了P/F比(103 [75-154.23]vs 131.75 [94.15-221, P 0.0001]),降低了FiO2需求量(80[60-100]vs 100[75-100], P 0.0034)。PaCO2 (45.8 [41-56.75]mmHg vs 54[42-73]mmHg p 0.0051)和通气量比(2.32 [1.92-3.15]vs 2.85 [2.07-3.85], p 0.0054)也在APRV试验期间得到改善。APRV期间,每体重预测潮气量增加(7.86 [7.06-9.85]mL/Kg vs 6.58 [5.69-7.86] mL/Kg, p<0.0001])和总分钟通气量降低(10.87±3.11 L/min vs 12.39±2.99 L/min, p 0.0005)。在多变量分析中,较高的I:E和气道压力与更大的P/F比改善相关。结论COVID-19合并严重低氧血症患者住院死亡率高。APRV可能使这些患者受益,因为它可以最大限度地增加肺泡再循环,从而改善氧合、肺泡通气和二氧化碳清除。这些影响在气道压力和I:E比较高时更为明显。APRV与潮量增加有关。然而,潮气量仍在肺保护性通气的推荐范围内。本研究为APRV对氧合和通气的积极作用提供了越来越多的证据。迫切需要前瞻性研究来评估APRV对COVID-19合并严重低氧血症患者临床结局的潜在益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Airway Pressure Release Ventilation as a Rescue Ventilatory Strategy in COVID-19 Patients
INTRODUCTION Airway Pressure Release Ventilation (APRV) is a pressure controlled intermittent mandatory mode of ventilation characterized by inverse ratio ventilation and high mean airway pressure. Several studies have showed that APRV can improve oxygenation and lung recruitment in patients with ARDS. Although most patients with COVID-19 meet the Berlin criteria, hypoxic respiratory failure due to COVID-19 may differ from traditional ARDS as patients often present with severe, refractory hypoxemia and significant variation in respiratory system compliance. To date, no studies investigating APRV in this population have been published.The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of APRV as a rescue mode of ventilation in critically ill patients diagnosed with COVID-19 and refractory hypoxemia.METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients admitted with COVID-19 who developed refractory hypoxemia (PaO2/FIO2 ratio (P/F ratio) <200) while on mechanical ventilation and were treated with a trial of APRV for at least 8 hours. P/F ratio, ventilatory ratio and ventilation outputs before and during APRV were compared.Student's t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used to compare parametric and nonparametric data, respectively.RESULTS There were 60 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Mean age was 65, 36.6% of the patients were female and in-hospital mortality was 80%. We found that APRV significantly improved the P/F ratio (103 [75-154.23] vs 131.75 [94.15-221, p 0.0001]) and decreased the FiO2 requirements (80[60-100] vs 100[75-100], p 0.0034). PaCO2 (45.8 [41-56.75]mmHg vs 54[42-73]mmHg p 0.0051), and Ventilatory ratio (2.32 [1.92-3.15] vs 2.85 [2.07-3.85], p 0.0054) were also improved during the APRV trial. There was an increase in tidal volume per predicted body weight during APRV (7.86 [7.06-9.85] mL/Kg vs 6.58 [5.69-7.86] mL/Kg, p< 0.0001]) and a decrease in total minute ventilation (10.87±3.11 L/min vs 12.39±2.99 L/min, p 0.0005). On multivariate analysis, higher I:E and airway pressure were associated with greater improvement of P/F ratio.CONCLUSION Patients with COVID-19 and severe hypoxemia have a high in-hospital mortality.APRV may benefit these patients as it maximizes alveolar recruitment resulting in improved oxygenation, alveolar ventilation and CO2 clearance.These effects are more pronounced for higher airway pressure and I:E ratio. APRV was associated with an increase in tidal volume.However, tidal volumes remained within the recommended limits of lung protective ventilation.This study contributes to the growing evidence on the positive effects of APRV on oxygenation and ventilation.Prospective studies are urgently needed to evaluate the potential benefits of APRV on clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19 and severe hypoxemia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信