阴茎再造性移植修复

D. Cooney, S. Tuffaha, C. Cooney, G. Brandacher, W. Lee, R. Redett
{"title":"阴茎再造性移植修复","authors":"D. Cooney, S. Tuffaha, C. Cooney, G. Brandacher, W. Lee, R. Redett","doi":"10.1080/23723505.2016.1215282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Male genitourinary trauma often results in devastating physical and psychological sequellae. Traditional options for autologous reconstruction do not fully restore form and function and are prone to significant complications involving urinary strictures and fistulae as well as prosthesis extrusion; we believe that reconstructive transplantation may provide improved outcomes for select patients. Thus far, penile allotransplantation has been performed twice with mixed results. Prior to more widespread implementation, carefully attention must be directed toward minimizing the benefits and minimizing the risks associated with this procedure. There are also a number of ethical considerations unique to penile transplantation that must be considered. In this article, we review the potential risks, benefits and ethical considerations pertaining to penile transplantation and discuss approaches to optimize outcomes.","PeriodicalId":372758,"journal":{"name":"Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reconstructive Transplantation for Penile Restoration\",\"authors\":\"D. Cooney, S. Tuffaha, C. Cooney, G. Brandacher, W. Lee, R. Redett\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23723505.2016.1215282\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Male genitourinary trauma often results in devastating physical and psychological sequellae. Traditional options for autologous reconstruction do not fully restore form and function and are prone to significant complications involving urinary strictures and fistulae as well as prosthesis extrusion; we believe that reconstructive transplantation may provide improved outcomes for select patients. Thus far, penile allotransplantation has been performed twice with mixed results. Prior to more widespread implementation, carefully attention must be directed toward minimizing the benefits and minimizing the risks associated with this procedure. There are also a number of ethical considerations unique to penile transplantation that must be considered. In this article, we review the potential risks, benefits and ethical considerations pertaining to penile transplantation and discuss approaches to optimize outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":372758,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23723505.2016.1215282\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23723505.2016.1215282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

男性泌尿生殖系统创伤往往导致毁灭性的生理和心理后遗症。传统的自体重建术不能完全恢复形态和功能,而且容易出现尿路狭窄、瘘管和假体挤压等严重并发症;我们相信重建移植可以改善部分患者的预后。迄今为止,阴茎异体移植已经进行了两次,结果好坏参半。在更广泛地实施之前,必须仔细注意与此程序有关的利益和风险的最小化。此外,阴茎移植还必须考虑到一些独特的伦理问题。在本文中,我们回顾了阴茎移植的潜在风险、益处和伦理考虑,并讨论了优化结果的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reconstructive Transplantation for Penile Restoration
Male genitourinary trauma often results in devastating physical and psychological sequellae. Traditional options for autologous reconstruction do not fully restore form and function and are prone to significant complications involving urinary strictures and fistulae as well as prosthesis extrusion; we believe that reconstructive transplantation may provide improved outcomes for select patients. Thus far, penile allotransplantation has been performed twice with mixed results. Prior to more widespread implementation, carefully attention must be directed toward minimizing the benefits and minimizing the risks associated with this procedure. There are also a number of ethical considerations unique to penile transplantation that must be considered. In this article, we review the potential risks, benefits and ethical considerations pertaining to penile transplantation and discuss approaches to optimize outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信