环境税:一种适合控制泥浆流动的工具?实验研究

François Cochard, A. Rozan
{"title":"环境税:一种适合控制泥浆流动的工具?实验研究","authors":"François Cochard, A. Rozan","doi":"10.3406/reae.2010.1989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"[paper in French] Recent surveys report the increasing number of muddy flows and point out the fact that agricultural practices (among others) play an important role in their occurrence. We propose to use an ambient tax/subsidy instrument to induce farmers to adopt better practices. The advantage of this type of instrument is that it allows the regulator to introduce the correct incentives without needing the observation of the agents’ individual efforts, but only of the collective result of efforts. Our first objective is to test the efficiency of the instrument in the specific context of muddy floods. Our second objective is to investigate the acceptability of this scheme. We run our experiment with six real farmers and carry out a socio-economic debriefing after the experiment. We observe that the instrument is relatively efficient at least in the first part of the experiment. However, the debriefing reveals subjects’ scepticism about the usefulness of the experimentation for investigating their real behaviour and that they are against this type of instrument.","PeriodicalId":170092,"journal":{"name":"Revue d’études en Agriculture et Environnement","volume":"698 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Taxe ambiante : un outil adapté à la lutte contre les coulées de boue ? Une étude expérimentale\",\"authors\":\"François Cochard, A. Rozan\",\"doi\":\"10.3406/reae.2010.1989\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"[paper in French] Recent surveys report the increasing number of muddy flows and point out the fact that agricultural practices (among others) play an important role in their occurrence. We propose to use an ambient tax/subsidy instrument to induce farmers to adopt better practices. The advantage of this type of instrument is that it allows the regulator to introduce the correct incentives without needing the observation of the agents’ individual efforts, but only of the collective result of efforts. Our first objective is to test the efficiency of the instrument in the specific context of muddy floods. Our second objective is to investigate the acceptability of this scheme. We run our experiment with six real farmers and carry out a socio-economic debriefing after the experiment. We observe that the instrument is relatively efficient at least in the first part of the experiment. However, the debriefing reveals subjects’ scepticism about the usefulness of the experimentation for investigating their real behaviour and that they are against this type of instrument.\",\"PeriodicalId\":170092,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revue d’études en Agriculture et Environnement\",\"volume\":\"698 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revue d’études en Agriculture et Environnement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3406/reae.2010.1989\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue d’études en Agriculture et Environnement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3406/reae.2010.1989","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

最近的调查报告了越来越多的泥流,并指出农业活动(以及其他活动)在泥流的发生中起着重要作用。我们建议使用环境税/补贴工具来诱导农民采用更好的做法。这种工具的优势在于,它允许监管者引入正确的激励,而不需要观察代理人的个人努力,而只需要观察努力的集体结果。我们的第一个目标是测试该仪器在泥泞洪水的特定背景下的效率。我们的第二个目标是调查这个方案的可接受性。我们对六位真正的农民进行了实验,并在实验后进行了社会经济汇报。我们观察到,至少在实验的第一部分,该仪器是相对有效的。然而,报告揭示了受试者对实验对调查他们真实行为的有用性的怀疑,他们反对这种类型的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Taxe ambiante : un outil adapté à la lutte contre les coulées de boue ? Une étude expérimentale
[paper in French] Recent surveys report the increasing number of muddy flows and point out the fact that agricultural practices (among others) play an important role in their occurrence. We propose to use an ambient tax/subsidy instrument to induce farmers to adopt better practices. The advantage of this type of instrument is that it allows the regulator to introduce the correct incentives without needing the observation of the agents’ individual efforts, but only of the collective result of efforts. Our first objective is to test the efficiency of the instrument in the specific context of muddy floods. Our second objective is to investigate the acceptability of this scheme. We run our experiment with six real farmers and carry out a socio-economic debriefing after the experiment. We observe that the instrument is relatively efficient at least in the first part of the experiment. However, the debriefing reveals subjects’ scepticism about the usefulness of the experimentation for investigating their real behaviour and that they are against this type of instrument.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信