在高压高压探井中采用控压固井和窄孔压裂压力窗泵拉法设计欠平衡固井塞的新方法:印度尼西亚东加里曼丹海上案例研究

_. Setiohadi, Praja Hadistira, Muhammad Alfianoor Yudhatama, Daniel Sitompul, Dhika Escodianto Hutabarat, Andre Wiharja, R. Panjaitan, C. Agriawan, R. Kusumawatie, V. R. Wedhaswari, Bagus Setyo Darmanto, A. Osman, C. Azwar, Wiwin Winarti, Andre Simanjuntak
{"title":"在高压高压探井中采用控压固井和窄孔压裂压力窗泵拉法设计欠平衡固井塞的新方法:印度尼西亚东加里曼丹海上案例研究","authors":"_. Setiohadi, Praja Hadistira, Muhammad Alfianoor Yudhatama, Daniel Sitompul, Dhika Escodianto Hutabarat, Andre Wiharja, R. Panjaitan, C. Agriawan, R. Kusumawatie, V. R. Wedhaswari, Bagus Setyo Darmanto, A. Osman, C. Azwar, Wiwin Winarti, Andre Simanjuntak","doi":"10.2118/210539-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The operator was drilling their first high-pressure high-temperature (HPHT) exploration well with narrow pressure window in a swamp area of East Kalimantan. The gas field was discovered in 1977 and production started in 1990. Since then, more than 1500 wells have been drilled in this area yielding a total gas production of 9.7 Tcf. Currently T field enters established mature field status which has quite marginal reserves. Therefore, further exploration is seen as one of the solutions to locate additional reserves to enhance overall gas production. The well was drilled directionally with no offset well nearby. While drilling the 6-in open hole section, an unexpected high-pressure zone was penetrated. The zone condition was made worse by lost circulation and a high gas reading.\n Two cement plugs were placed using a managed pressure cementing with pump and pull method. The first plug was set by applying surface back pressure (SBP) to maintain equivalent bottom hole pressure (BHP) between lowermost pore pressure (PP) and fracture gradient (FG) at the previous shoe. After pumping 1 m3 of cement into the annulus, pump and pull operations commenced. While performing post job circulation on the first plug, it was observed that the returned fluid density at surface was less than original mud weight, indicating the possibility of contaminant invasion from formation. After waiting for the cement to reach 500 psi compressive strength, pressure buildup was observed when annulus was shut-in, indicating an inadequate pressure seal across the cement plug\n Applying lessons learned from setting the first plug, new design considerations were implemented such as increasing cement volume in the annulus to 4 m3 prior to the pump and pull operation to minimize cement overlapping risk and applying SBP at BHP near FG. A contingency plan was in place to determine the appropriate SBP value to be applied whenever the pumping rate was changed. A second plug job was performed safely and flawlessly by achieving the top of cement as desired. A successful inflow test was performed with indication of no contaminant invasion nor pressure bypass around the cement plug. The rig was able to continue its next operation to sidetrack the well.\n This paper presents the design considerations, methodology applied, and lessons learned two managed pressure cement plugs using pump and pull method in a well bore with a narrow pore-frac window where the new techniques were implemented to enhance success of the plug job despite the complexity and risk inherent with an underbalanced operation.","PeriodicalId":336268,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, September 28, 2022","volume":"92 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A New Approach for Designing an Underbalanced Cementing Plug Using a Managed Pressure Cementing and Pump-Pull Method with Narrow Pore-Frac Pressure Window in HPHT Exploration Well: An Offshore East Kalimantan, Indonesia Case Study\",\"authors\":\"_. Setiohadi, Praja Hadistira, Muhammad Alfianoor Yudhatama, Daniel Sitompul, Dhika Escodianto Hutabarat, Andre Wiharja, R. Panjaitan, C. Agriawan, R. Kusumawatie, V. R. Wedhaswari, Bagus Setyo Darmanto, A. Osman, C. Azwar, Wiwin Winarti, Andre Simanjuntak\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/210539-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The operator was drilling their first high-pressure high-temperature (HPHT) exploration well with narrow pressure window in a swamp area of East Kalimantan. The gas field was discovered in 1977 and production started in 1990. Since then, more than 1500 wells have been drilled in this area yielding a total gas production of 9.7 Tcf. Currently T field enters established mature field status which has quite marginal reserves. Therefore, further exploration is seen as one of the solutions to locate additional reserves to enhance overall gas production. The well was drilled directionally with no offset well nearby. While drilling the 6-in open hole section, an unexpected high-pressure zone was penetrated. The zone condition was made worse by lost circulation and a high gas reading.\\n Two cement plugs were placed using a managed pressure cementing with pump and pull method. The first plug was set by applying surface back pressure (SBP) to maintain equivalent bottom hole pressure (BHP) between lowermost pore pressure (PP) and fracture gradient (FG) at the previous shoe. After pumping 1 m3 of cement into the annulus, pump and pull operations commenced. While performing post job circulation on the first plug, it was observed that the returned fluid density at surface was less than original mud weight, indicating the possibility of contaminant invasion from formation. After waiting for the cement to reach 500 psi compressive strength, pressure buildup was observed when annulus was shut-in, indicating an inadequate pressure seal across the cement plug\\n Applying lessons learned from setting the first plug, new design considerations were implemented such as increasing cement volume in the annulus to 4 m3 prior to the pump and pull operation to minimize cement overlapping risk and applying SBP at BHP near FG. A contingency plan was in place to determine the appropriate SBP value to be applied whenever the pumping rate was changed. A second plug job was performed safely and flawlessly by achieving the top of cement as desired. A successful inflow test was performed with indication of no contaminant invasion nor pressure bypass around the cement plug. The rig was able to continue its next operation to sidetrack the well.\\n This paper presents the design considerations, methodology applied, and lessons learned two managed pressure cement plugs using pump and pull method in a well bore with a narrow pore-frac window where the new techniques were implemented to enhance success of the plug job despite the complexity and risk inherent with an underbalanced operation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":336268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Wed, September 28, 2022\",\"volume\":\"92 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Wed, September 28, 2022\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/210539-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, September 28, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/210539-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该公司在东加里曼丹的沼泽地区钻了他们的第一口高压高温(HPHT)探井,该探井具有狭窄的压力窗口。该气田于1977年被发现,1990年开始生产。从那时起,该地区已经钻了1500多口井,总天然气产量为9.7万亿立方英尺。目前T油田已进入成熟油田状态,储量相当边际。因此,进一步勘探被视为寻找额外储量以提高整体天然气产量的解决方案之一。该井是定向钻井,附近没有邻井。在钻6英寸裸眼井段时,意外地钻入了一个高压区域。漏失和高气体读数使储层状况变得更糟。使用泵拉控压固井方法放置了两个水泥塞。第一个桥塞是通过施加地面背压(SBP)来坐封的,以保持上一个鞋的最低孔隙压力(PP)和裂缝梯度(FG)之间的等效井底压力(BHP)。将1m3的水泥泵入环空后,开始泵拔作业。在对第一个桥塞进行作业后循环时,观察到地面返回的流体密度小于原始泥浆重量,这表明可能有污染物从地层侵入。在等待水泥达到500psi的抗压强度后,在环空关井时观察到压力增加,表明水泥塞的压力密封不足,根据第一次封井的经验教训,实施了新的设计考虑,例如在泵拔作业之前将环空的水泥体积增加到4m3,以尽量减少水泥重叠风险,并在FG附近的BHP使用SBP。制定了应急计划,以便在泵速发生变化时确定适当的收缩压值。第二次封井作业安全、完美地完成了水泥的顶部。进行了一次成功的流入测试,表明没有污染物侵入,水泥塞周围也没有压力旁路。该钻机能够继续进行下一个侧钻作业。本文介绍了在窄孔压裂窗口井眼中使用泵拉法控制压力水泥塞的设计考虑、应用方法和经验教训,尽管不平衡作业固有的复杂性和风险,但新技术的应用提高了水泥塞作业的成功率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A New Approach for Designing an Underbalanced Cementing Plug Using a Managed Pressure Cementing and Pump-Pull Method with Narrow Pore-Frac Pressure Window in HPHT Exploration Well: An Offshore East Kalimantan, Indonesia Case Study
The operator was drilling their first high-pressure high-temperature (HPHT) exploration well with narrow pressure window in a swamp area of East Kalimantan. The gas field was discovered in 1977 and production started in 1990. Since then, more than 1500 wells have been drilled in this area yielding a total gas production of 9.7 Tcf. Currently T field enters established mature field status which has quite marginal reserves. Therefore, further exploration is seen as one of the solutions to locate additional reserves to enhance overall gas production. The well was drilled directionally with no offset well nearby. While drilling the 6-in open hole section, an unexpected high-pressure zone was penetrated. The zone condition was made worse by lost circulation and a high gas reading. Two cement plugs were placed using a managed pressure cementing with pump and pull method. The first plug was set by applying surface back pressure (SBP) to maintain equivalent bottom hole pressure (BHP) between lowermost pore pressure (PP) and fracture gradient (FG) at the previous shoe. After pumping 1 m3 of cement into the annulus, pump and pull operations commenced. While performing post job circulation on the first plug, it was observed that the returned fluid density at surface was less than original mud weight, indicating the possibility of contaminant invasion from formation. After waiting for the cement to reach 500 psi compressive strength, pressure buildup was observed when annulus was shut-in, indicating an inadequate pressure seal across the cement plug Applying lessons learned from setting the first plug, new design considerations were implemented such as increasing cement volume in the annulus to 4 m3 prior to the pump and pull operation to minimize cement overlapping risk and applying SBP at BHP near FG. A contingency plan was in place to determine the appropriate SBP value to be applied whenever the pumping rate was changed. A second plug job was performed safely and flawlessly by achieving the top of cement as desired. A successful inflow test was performed with indication of no contaminant invasion nor pressure bypass around the cement plug. The rig was able to continue its next operation to sidetrack the well. This paper presents the design considerations, methodology applied, and lessons learned two managed pressure cement plugs using pump and pull method in a well bore with a narrow pore-frac window where the new techniques were implemented to enhance success of the plug job despite the complexity and risk inherent with an underbalanced operation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信