12节。分析师的观点是:全世界都听到了

ACM Stand. Pub Date : 1997-12-01 DOI:10.1145/274348.274360
Maureen O'Gara
{"title":"12节。分析师的观点是:全世界都听到了","authors":"Maureen O'Gara","doi":"10.1145/274348.274360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"m These articles were excerpted from ClieNT Server News, the “piquant weekly newsletter (by subscription only) on Microsoft, Windows NT and related phenomena”—one of three such newsletters published by Maureen O’Gara to aid policy and decision makers (from product managers to CEOs). The author knows the industry and its participants, having covered the worldwide “open systems industry” (from UNIX to POSIX to OSI to the Internet) for the past ten years. These articles reflect the positions she took on the PAS submission, and advice she provided to her subscribers, during the debate. MARCH 24–28, 1997 Sun’s Java Standardization Scheme n an unprecedented move, Sun Microsystems will try to standardize Java by submitting it directly to ISO, the International Organization for Standardization, for fast tracking. Standards experts say the scheme, which they attribute to an English consultant, circumvents all outside comment on the would-be standard and seeks to keep Java tightly within Sun’s control by bypassing the normal ISO process. Traditionally, a prospective standard would go first to a bona fide standards group such as X/Open or the European Computer Manufacturers Association (ECMA) for public airing and then to ISO. Never before, the experts say, has an individual company sought the prerogatives ISO previously only accorded consortia to become a Recognized Publicly Available Specification (PAS) submitter. The move, which is believed to reflect Sun’s fear that Microsoft will somehow kidnap Java if its standardization is handled conventionally, could cost Sun some of its vaunted reputation as an open company that adheres to open processes. Standards people, most of them partial to Sun, some of them even at Sun, are concerned that Sun might set a precedent whereby other companies like Microsoft, for instance, will also bypass the normal vetting procedure and seek to get their technologies rubberstamped as standards. Of course it remains to be seen whether ISO countenances Sun as a PAS submitter and allows it to control the requirements process. However, ISO, despite the threat of embarrassment, might find Java’s lure irresistible—it is after all a big fish to catch simply on the basis of the billions of dollars that are being poured into it. It will be July before we know whether Sun is recognized as a PAS submitter. Sun’s PAS application goes from here to the ISOInternational Electrotechnical Commission’s Joint Technology Committee1 (JTC1). From JTC1, it is distributed to the JTC1’s Technical Advisory Groups (TAGs) in 30 countries for a yes-or-no vote on whether to accept Sun as a PAS. There would then be a second yes-or-no vote on whether to accept the Java technology, as handed down by Sun, as a standard. The process could become contentious at the national level. Sun will be sidestepping the normal procedure that would see Java become a national Section 12. The Analyst’s View: What the World Heard","PeriodicalId":270594,"journal":{"name":"ACM Stand.","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Section 12. The analyst's view: what the world heard\",\"authors\":\"Maureen O'Gara\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/274348.274360\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"m These articles were excerpted from ClieNT Server News, the “piquant weekly newsletter (by subscription only) on Microsoft, Windows NT and related phenomena”—one of three such newsletters published by Maureen O’Gara to aid policy and decision makers (from product managers to CEOs). The author knows the industry and its participants, having covered the worldwide “open systems industry” (from UNIX to POSIX to OSI to the Internet) for the past ten years. These articles reflect the positions she took on the PAS submission, and advice she provided to her subscribers, during the debate. MARCH 24–28, 1997 Sun’s Java Standardization Scheme n an unprecedented move, Sun Microsystems will try to standardize Java by submitting it directly to ISO, the International Organization for Standardization, for fast tracking. Standards experts say the scheme, which they attribute to an English consultant, circumvents all outside comment on the would-be standard and seeks to keep Java tightly within Sun’s control by bypassing the normal ISO process. Traditionally, a prospective standard would go first to a bona fide standards group such as X/Open or the European Computer Manufacturers Association (ECMA) for public airing and then to ISO. Never before, the experts say, has an individual company sought the prerogatives ISO previously only accorded consortia to become a Recognized Publicly Available Specification (PAS) submitter. The move, which is believed to reflect Sun’s fear that Microsoft will somehow kidnap Java if its standardization is handled conventionally, could cost Sun some of its vaunted reputation as an open company that adheres to open processes. Standards people, most of them partial to Sun, some of them even at Sun, are concerned that Sun might set a precedent whereby other companies like Microsoft, for instance, will also bypass the normal vetting procedure and seek to get their technologies rubberstamped as standards. Of course it remains to be seen whether ISO countenances Sun as a PAS submitter and allows it to control the requirements process. However, ISO, despite the threat of embarrassment, might find Java’s lure irresistible—it is after all a big fish to catch simply on the basis of the billions of dollars that are being poured into it. It will be July before we know whether Sun is recognized as a PAS submitter. Sun’s PAS application goes from here to the ISOInternational Electrotechnical Commission’s Joint Technology Committee1 (JTC1). From JTC1, it is distributed to the JTC1’s Technical Advisory Groups (TAGs) in 30 countries for a yes-or-no vote on whether to accept Sun as a PAS. There would then be a second yes-or-no vote on whether to accept the Java technology, as handed down by Sun, as a standard. The process could become contentious at the national level. Sun will be sidestepping the normal procedure that would see Java become a national Section 12. The Analyst’s View: What the World Heard\",\"PeriodicalId\":270594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Stand.\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Stand.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/274348.274360\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Stand.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/274348.274360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这些文章摘自“客户服务器新闻”,这是“关于微软、Windows NT和相关现象的有趣的每周时事通讯(仅限订阅)”,是莫林·奥格拉出版的三份此类时事通讯之一,旨在帮助政策和决策者(从产品经理到首席执行官)。作者了解这个行业和它的参与者,在过去的十年里,他覆盖了世界范围内的“开放系统行业”(从UNIX到POSIX到OSI再到Internet)。这些文章反映了她在辩论期间对考绩司提交的文件所持的立场,以及她向订阅者提供的建议。1997年3月24日至28日Sun的Java标准化计划在一次史无前例的行动中,Sun微系统公司将尝试将Java标准化,直接提交给ISO(国际标准化组织),以便快速跟踪。标准专家表示,他们认为该计划是由一位英国顾问提出的,该计划规避了外界对即将制定的标准的所有评论,并试图通过绕过正常的ISO流程,将Java牢牢地置于Sun的控制之下。传统上,一个潜在的标准将首先进入一个真正的标准组织,如X/Open或欧洲计算机制造商协会(ECMA)进行公开发布,然后再进入ISO。专家们说,以前从来没有一家公司寻求ISO以前只给予联盟的特权,以成为公认的公共可用规范(PAS)提交者。这一举动被认为反映了Sun的担心,即如果按照传统方式处理Java的标准化,微软会以某种方式绑架Java,这可能会使Sun失去其作为一家坚持开放流程的开放公司的一些自诩的声誉。标准制定者,他们中的大多数偏爱Sun,其中一些人甚至在Sun公司,担心Sun可能会开创一个先例,使其他公司,如微软,也将绕过正常的审查程序,寻求将他们的技术作为标准盖章。当然,ISO是否支持Sun作为PAS提交者并允许它控制需求过程还有待观察。然而,尽管面临着尴尬的威胁,ISO可能会发现Java的诱惑是不可抗拒的——毕竟,仅仅从数十亿美元的投入来看,它就是一条大鱼。我们要到7月份才能知道Sun是否被认可为PAS提交者。Sun的PAS申请从这里提交给iso国际电工委员会联合技术委员会1 (JTC1)。从JTC1开始,它被分发到30个国家的JTC1技术咨询小组(TAGs),对是否接受Sun作为PAS进行赞成或反对的投票。然后将会有第二次“是”或“否”的投票来决定是否接受由Sun传递下来的Java技术作为标准。这一过程可能在国家层面引发争议。Sun将避开Java成为国家第12节的正常过程。分析者的观点:世界听到了什么
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Section 12. The analyst's view: what the world heard
m These articles were excerpted from ClieNT Server News, the “piquant weekly newsletter (by subscription only) on Microsoft, Windows NT and related phenomena”—one of three such newsletters published by Maureen O’Gara to aid policy and decision makers (from product managers to CEOs). The author knows the industry and its participants, having covered the worldwide “open systems industry” (from UNIX to POSIX to OSI to the Internet) for the past ten years. These articles reflect the positions she took on the PAS submission, and advice she provided to her subscribers, during the debate. MARCH 24–28, 1997 Sun’s Java Standardization Scheme n an unprecedented move, Sun Microsystems will try to standardize Java by submitting it directly to ISO, the International Organization for Standardization, for fast tracking. Standards experts say the scheme, which they attribute to an English consultant, circumvents all outside comment on the would-be standard and seeks to keep Java tightly within Sun’s control by bypassing the normal ISO process. Traditionally, a prospective standard would go first to a bona fide standards group such as X/Open or the European Computer Manufacturers Association (ECMA) for public airing and then to ISO. Never before, the experts say, has an individual company sought the prerogatives ISO previously only accorded consortia to become a Recognized Publicly Available Specification (PAS) submitter. The move, which is believed to reflect Sun’s fear that Microsoft will somehow kidnap Java if its standardization is handled conventionally, could cost Sun some of its vaunted reputation as an open company that adheres to open processes. Standards people, most of them partial to Sun, some of them even at Sun, are concerned that Sun might set a precedent whereby other companies like Microsoft, for instance, will also bypass the normal vetting procedure and seek to get their technologies rubberstamped as standards. Of course it remains to be seen whether ISO countenances Sun as a PAS submitter and allows it to control the requirements process. However, ISO, despite the threat of embarrassment, might find Java’s lure irresistible—it is after all a big fish to catch simply on the basis of the billions of dollars that are being poured into it. It will be July before we know whether Sun is recognized as a PAS submitter. Sun’s PAS application goes from here to the ISOInternational Electrotechnical Commission’s Joint Technology Committee1 (JTC1). From JTC1, it is distributed to the JTC1’s Technical Advisory Groups (TAGs) in 30 countries for a yes-or-no vote on whether to accept Sun as a PAS. There would then be a second yes-or-no vote on whether to accept the Java technology, as handed down by Sun, as a standard. The process could become contentious at the national level. Sun will be sidestepping the normal procedure that would see Java become a national Section 12. The Analyst’s View: What the World Heard
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信