可能性答案集规划中信任与信念的推理

Gabriel Maia, João F. L. Alcântara
{"title":"可能性答案集规划中信任与信念的推理","authors":"Gabriel Maia, João F. L. Alcântara","doi":"10.1109/BRACIS.2016.048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Possibilistic Answer Set Framework was conceived to deal with not only non monotonic reasoning, but also with uncertainty by associating a certainty level to each piece of knowledge. Here we extend this formalism to a multiagent approach robust enough to manage both the uncertainty about autonomous agents expressed in terms of degrees of trust and the possibilistic uncertainty about their knowledge bases expressed as possibilistic answer set programs. As result, we have a decentralized system able to reason about trust and beliefs in an integrated way. Then we motivate its behavior on an example and highlight how our proposal can be employed to make decisions when the information is distributed, uncertain, potentially contradictory and not necessarily reliable.","PeriodicalId":183149,"journal":{"name":"2016 5th Brazilian Conference on Intelligent Systems (BRACIS)","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reasoning about Trust and Belief in Possibilistic Answer Set Programming\",\"authors\":\"Gabriel Maia, João F. L. Alcântara\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/BRACIS.2016.048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Possibilistic Answer Set Framework was conceived to deal with not only non monotonic reasoning, but also with uncertainty by associating a certainty level to each piece of knowledge. Here we extend this formalism to a multiagent approach robust enough to manage both the uncertainty about autonomous agents expressed in terms of degrees of trust and the possibilistic uncertainty about their knowledge bases expressed as possibilistic answer set programs. As result, we have a decentralized system able to reason about trust and beliefs in an integrated way. Then we motivate its behavior on an example and highlight how our proposal can be employed to make decisions when the information is distributed, uncertain, potentially contradictory and not necessarily reliable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":183149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 5th Brazilian Conference on Intelligent Systems (BRACIS)\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 5th Brazilian Conference on Intelligent Systems (BRACIS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/BRACIS.2016.048\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 5th Brazilian Conference on Intelligent Systems (BRACIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BRACIS.2016.048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

可能性答案集框架不仅可以处理非单调推理,还可以通过将每个知识关联一个确定性级别来处理不确定性。在这里,我们将这种形式主义扩展到一个多智能体方法,该方法足够强大,可以管理以信任程度表示的自主智能体的不确定性和以可能性答案集程序表示的其知识库的可能性不确定性。因此,我们有了一个去中心化的系统,能够以一种综合的方式来推理信任和信仰。然后,我们通过一个例子来激励它的行为,并强调我们的建议如何在信息分散、不确定、潜在矛盾和不一定可靠的情况下用于决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reasoning about Trust and Belief in Possibilistic Answer Set Programming
The Possibilistic Answer Set Framework was conceived to deal with not only non monotonic reasoning, but also with uncertainty by associating a certainty level to each piece of knowledge. Here we extend this formalism to a multiagent approach robust enough to manage both the uncertainty about autonomous agents expressed in terms of degrees of trust and the possibilistic uncertainty about their knowledge bases expressed as possibilistic answer set programs. As result, we have a decentralized system able to reason about trust and beliefs in an integrated way. Then we motivate its behavior on an example and highlight how our proposal can be employed to make decisions when the information is distributed, uncertain, potentially contradictory and not necessarily reliable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信