信息系统谈判行为研究

Nereu F. Kock, R. McQueen, Megan Baker, A. Rouse
{"title":"信息系统谈判行为研究","authors":"Nereu F. Kock, R. McQueen, Megan Baker, A. Rouse","doi":"10.1109/ISCNZ.1996.555292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper discusses the gradual negotiation process involved in the resolution of the initiative dilemma of IS action research. This dilemma occurs when the researcher faces the decision to either take the initiative to define an opportunity for generating knowledge, and then try to find possible client organisations, or to leave this initiative to client organisations and tackle problems proposed by them. The first option may lead to the definition of a research project that does not meet the interests of client organisations, while the second may lead to a research topic beyond the researcher's area of interest or area of expertise. The dilemma is resolved through a process of negotiation. The paper proposes two models to explain this negotiation process and to resolve this dilemma: a model of the overall negotiation process, and a model of the cyclical information exchange that supports this process.","PeriodicalId":352879,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 1996 Information Systems Conference of New Zealand","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Negotiation in information systems action research\",\"authors\":\"Nereu F. Kock, R. McQueen, Megan Baker, A. Rouse\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISCNZ.1996.555292\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper discusses the gradual negotiation process involved in the resolution of the initiative dilemma of IS action research. This dilemma occurs when the researcher faces the decision to either take the initiative to define an opportunity for generating knowledge, and then try to find possible client organisations, or to leave this initiative to client organisations and tackle problems proposed by them. The first option may lead to the definition of a research project that does not meet the interests of client organisations, while the second may lead to a research topic beyond the researcher's area of interest or area of expertise. The dilemma is resolved through a process of negotiation. The paper proposes two models to explain this negotiation process and to resolve this dilemma: a model of the overall negotiation process, and a model of the cyclical information exchange that supports this process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":352879,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of 1996 Information Systems Conference of New Zealand\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of 1996 Information Systems Conference of New Zealand\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCNZ.1996.555292\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 1996 Information Systems Conference of New Zealand","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCNZ.1996.555292","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

本文讨论了IS行动研究中解决主动性困境所涉及的渐进谈判过程。这种困境发生时,研究人员面临的决定,要么采取主动来定义一个机会,以产生知识,然后试图找到可能的客户组织,或离开这个主动的客户组织,并解决他们提出的问题。第一种选择可能导致研究项目的定义不符合客户组织的利益,而第二种选择可能导致研究主题超出研究人员的兴趣领域或专业领域。这个困境是通过谈判解决的。本文提出了两个模型来解释这一谈判过程并解决这一困境:一个是整体谈判过程模型,另一个是支持这一过程的周期性信息交换模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Negotiation in information systems action research
The paper discusses the gradual negotiation process involved in the resolution of the initiative dilemma of IS action research. This dilemma occurs when the researcher faces the decision to either take the initiative to define an opportunity for generating knowledge, and then try to find possible client organisations, or to leave this initiative to client organisations and tackle problems proposed by them. The first option may lead to the definition of a research project that does not meet the interests of client organisations, while the second may lead to a research topic beyond the researcher's area of interest or area of expertise. The dilemma is resolved through a process of negotiation. The paper proposes two models to explain this negotiation process and to resolve this dilemma: a model of the overall negotiation process, and a model of the cyclical information exchange that supports this process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信