大学生运动员每周两次不同训练场地增强式训练后反动作跳高、起跳力和最大同心力的变化

P. Borah, Lakshyajit Gogoi, H. Gogoi, Karuppasamy Govindasamy, Sambhu Prasad, Tadang Minu, Koulla Parpa, Abderraouf Ben Abderrahman
{"title":"大学生运动员每周两次不同训练场地增强式训练后反动作跳高、起跳力和最大同心力的变化","authors":"P. Borah, Lakshyajit Gogoi, H. Gogoi, Karuppasamy Govindasamy, Sambhu Prasad, Tadang Minu, Koulla Parpa, Abderraouf Ben Abderrahman","doi":"10.15391/snsv.2023-1.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study aimed to examine the effects of two sessions per week plyometric training on different surfaces on the counter movement jump height, take-off force, and maximum concentric power of collegiate athletes.\n\nMaterial and methods: Male collegiate athletes (n=24, age=18.46±1.14 years, weight=64.88±5.61 kg and height=1.72±0.07 metres)) from a physical training centre were randomly and equally assigned to three groups, each trained on different surfaces (synthetic, cinder and sand). The training intervention was implemented twice a week and lasted for 8 weeks. The athletes were tested before and after the intervention to assess changes in the performance of counter movement jump height (CMJHT), take-off force (CMJTOF) and maximum concentric power (CMJMCP).\n\nResults: Results showed that overall measurement of CMJHT, CMJTOF and CMJMCP improved significantly (p≤0.05, Δ %=10.50; p≤0.05, Δ%=11.11; p≤0.05, Δ%=11.41). However, training surfaces have no significant effect on the improvement of the selected variables (CMJHT:F(2,21)=2.37, p=0.118, ηp2=0.184; CMJTOF:F(2,21)=1.28, p=0.299, ηp2=0.109; CMJMCP:F(2,21)=0.061, p=0.941, ηp2=0.006). Further, for the synthetic track surface group CMJHT, CMJTOF and CMJMCP improved significantly (p≤0.05, Δ%=16.36; p≤0.05, Δ%=17.50; p≤0.05, Δ%=17.99); for the cinder track surface group CMJHT and CMJMCP improved significantly (p≤0.05, Δ%=9.15; p≤0.05, Δ%=10.33) and for the sand surface group only CMJHT improved significantly (p≤0.05, Δ%=5.68).\n\nConclusions: The findings suggest that plyometric training on different surfaces can effectively improve athletic performance, but the specific surface type does not appear to impact the outcomes significantly. The study further suggested analysing the injury risk associated with plyometric training on various training surfaces and discovering the optimal training surface for minimising injury risk while maximising performance gains.","PeriodicalId":187167,"journal":{"name":"Слобожанський науково-спортивний вісник","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes in Counter Movement Jump Height, Take-off Force and Maximum Concentric Power of Collegiate Athletes After Two Sessions Per Week Plyometric Training on Different Training Surfaces\",\"authors\":\"P. Borah, Lakshyajit Gogoi, H. Gogoi, Karuppasamy Govindasamy, Sambhu Prasad, Tadang Minu, Koulla Parpa, Abderraouf Ben Abderrahman\",\"doi\":\"10.15391/snsv.2023-1.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: This study aimed to examine the effects of two sessions per week plyometric training on different surfaces on the counter movement jump height, take-off force, and maximum concentric power of collegiate athletes.\\n\\nMaterial and methods: Male collegiate athletes (n=24, age=18.46±1.14 years, weight=64.88±5.61 kg and height=1.72±0.07 metres)) from a physical training centre were randomly and equally assigned to three groups, each trained on different surfaces (synthetic, cinder and sand). The training intervention was implemented twice a week and lasted for 8 weeks. The athletes were tested before and after the intervention to assess changes in the performance of counter movement jump height (CMJHT), take-off force (CMJTOF) and maximum concentric power (CMJMCP).\\n\\nResults: Results showed that overall measurement of CMJHT, CMJTOF and CMJMCP improved significantly (p≤0.05, Δ %=10.50; p≤0.05, Δ%=11.11; p≤0.05, Δ%=11.41). However, training surfaces have no significant effect on the improvement of the selected variables (CMJHT:F(2,21)=2.37, p=0.118, ηp2=0.184; CMJTOF:F(2,21)=1.28, p=0.299, ηp2=0.109; CMJMCP:F(2,21)=0.061, p=0.941, ηp2=0.006). Further, for the synthetic track surface group CMJHT, CMJTOF and CMJMCP improved significantly (p≤0.05, Δ%=16.36; p≤0.05, Δ%=17.50; p≤0.05, Δ%=17.99); for the cinder track surface group CMJHT and CMJMCP improved significantly (p≤0.05, Δ%=9.15; p≤0.05, Δ%=10.33) and for the sand surface group only CMJHT improved significantly (p≤0.05, Δ%=5.68).\\n\\nConclusions: The findings suggest that plyometric training on different surfaces can effectively improve athletic performance, but the specific surface type does not appear to impact the outcomes significantly. The study further suggested analysing the injury risk associated with plyometric training on various training surfaces and discovering the optimal training surface for minimising injury risk while maximising performance gains.\",\"PeriodicalId\":187167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Слобожанський науково-спортивний вісник\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Слобожанський науково-спортивний вісник\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15391/snsv.2023-1.005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Слобожанський науково-спортивний вісник","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15391/snsv.2023-1.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要目的:探讨每周两次不同表面增强训练对大学生运动员反动作、起跳高度、起跳力和最大同心力的影响。材料与方法:选取某体育训练中心的男大学生运动员24名,年龄18.46±1.14岁,体重64.88±5.61 kg,身高1.72±0.07 m,随机分为三组,每组在不同的表面(合成、煤渣和砂)上进行训练。训练干预每周2次,持续8周。在干预前后对运动员进行反动作跳高(CMJHT)、起跳力(CMJTOF)和最大同心力(CMJMCP)的测试。结果:结果显示CMJHT、CMJTOF和CMJMCP的整体测量有显著改善(p≤0.05,Δ %=10.50;p≤0.05,Δ% = 11.11;p≤0.05,Δ% = 11.41)。然而,训练面对所选变量的改进没有显著影响(CMJHT:F(2,21)=2.37, p=0.118, ηp2=0.184;CMJTOF:F(2,21)=1.28, p=0.299, ηp2=0.109;CMJMCP:F(2,21)=0.061, p=0.941, ηp2=0.006)。此外,合成轨道表面组CMJHT、CMJTOF和CMJMCP均有显著改善(p≤0.05,Δ%=16.36;p≤0.05,Δ% = 17.50;p≤0.05,Δ% = 17.99);对于煤渣履带面组,CMJHT和CMJMCP改善显著(p≤0.05,Δ%=9.15;p≤0.05,Δ%=10.33),砂面组只有CMJHT有显著改善(p≤0.05,Δ%=5.68)。结论:研究结果表明,在不同的表面上进行增强训练可以有效地提高运动成绩,但特定的表面类型似乎对结果没有显著影响。该研究进一步建议在不同的训练表面上分析与增强训练相关的受伤风险,并发现最佳的训练表面,以最大限度地减少受伤风险,同时最大限度地提高成绩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Changes in Counter Movement Jump Height, Take-off Force and Maximum Concentric Power of Collegiate Athletes After Two Sessions Per Week Plyometric Training on Different Training Surfaces
Purpose: This study aimed to examine the effects of two sessions per week plyometric training on different surfaces on the counter movement jump height, take-off force, and maximum concentric power of collegiate athletes. Material and methods: Male collegiate athletes (n=24, age=18.46±1.14 years, weight=64.88±5.61 kg and height=1.72±0.07 metres)) from a physical training centre were randomly and equally assigned to three groups, each trained on different surfaces (synthetic, cinder and sand). The training intervention was implemented twice a week and lasted for 8 weeks. The athletes were tested before and after the intervention to assess changes in the performance of counter movement jump height (CMJHT), take-off force (CMJTOF) and maximum concentric power (CMJMCP). Results: Results showed that overall measurement of CMJHT, CMJTOF and CMJMCP improved significantly (p≤0.05, Δ %=10.50; p≤0.05, Δ%=11.11; p≤0.05, Δ%=11.41). However, training surfaces have no significant effect on the improvement of the selected variables (CMJHT:F(2,21)=2.37, p=0.118, ηp2=0.184; CMJTOF:F(2,21)=1.28, p=0.299, ηp2=0.109; CMJMCP:F(2,21)=0.061, p=0.941, ηp2=0.006). Further, for the synthetic track surface group CMJHT, CMJTOF and CMJMCP improved significantly (p≤0.05, Δ%=16.36; p≤0.05, Δ%=17.50; p≤0.05, Δ%=17.99); for the cinder track surface group CMJHT and CMJMCP improved significantly (p≤0.05, Δ%=9.15; p≤0.05, Δ%=10.33) and for the sand surface group only CMJHT improved significantly (p≤0.05, Δ%=5.68). Conclusions: The findings suggest that plyometric training on different surfaces can effectively improve athletic performance, but the specific surface type does not appear to impact the outcomes significantly. The study further suggested analysing the injury risk associated with plyometric training on various training surfaces and discovering the optimal training surface for minimising injury risk while maximising performance gains.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信