M. Vierimaa, J. Taramaa, Heli Puustinen, Kati Suominen, Tommi Ketola
{"title":"维护环境的工具评估框架","authors":"M. Vierimaa, J. Taramaa, Heli Puustinen, Kati Suominen, Tommi Ketola","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1096-908X(199805/06)10:3%3C203::AID-SMR173%3E3.0.CO;2-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tool evaluation forms an essential part of tool development. Unfortunately, there are only a few solutions for this activity. As part of the AMES project, tool evaluation was implemented as part of a more comprehensive framework, used with the development and application of several AMES tools for application maintenance. These included an application understanding tool-set, a disabbreviation tool, a reverse-engineering tool and an impact analysis tool-set. In addition, the requirement for applicability both to on-board space software and to tool software has directed our approach in setting requirements for tools evaluation. The central element of the evaluation process was an AMES-developed framework including evaluation criteria and the use of a goal/question/metrics (GQM) based approach. The criteria have produced detailed information about each tool. The final result can be regarded as a combination of the score for each criterion and explicit metrics data. In addition, descriptive information about applications was used in tool evaluation. 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.","PeriodicalId":383619,"journal":{"name":"J. Softw. Maintenance Res. Pract.","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Framework for tool evaluation for a maintenance environment\",\"authors\":\"M. Vierimaa, J. Taramaa, Heli Puustinen, Kati Suominen, Tommi Ketola\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/(SICI)1096-908X(199805/06)10:3%3C203::AID-SMR173%3E3.0.CO;2-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Tool evaluation forms an essential part of tool development. Unfortunately, there are only a few solutions for this activity. As part of the AMES project, tool evaluation was implemented as part of a more comprehensive framework, used with the development and application of several AMES tools for application maintenance. These included an application understanding tool-set, a disabbreviation tool, a reverse-engineering tool and an impact analysis tool-set. In addition, the requirement for applicability both to on-board space software and to tool software has directed our approach in setting requirements for tools evaluation. The central element of the evaluation process was an AMES-developed framework including evaluation criteria and the use of a goal/question/metrics (GQM) based approach. The criteria have produced detailed information about each tool. The final result can be regarded as a combination of the score for each criterion and explicit metrics data. In addition, descriptive information about applications was used in tool evaluation. 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.\",\"PeriodicalId\":383619,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"J. Softw. Maintenance Res. Pract.\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"J. Softw. Maintenance Res. Pract.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-908X(199805/06)10:3%3C203::AID-SMR173%3E3.0.CO;2-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Softw. Maintenance Res. Pract.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-908X(199805/06)10:3%3C203::AID-SMR173%3E3.0.CO;2-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
工具评估是工具开发的重要组成部分。不幸的是,只有几个解决方案。作为AMES项目的一部分,工具评估作为更全面的框架的一部分实现,与用于应用程序维护的几个AMES工具的开发和应用一起使用。这些工具包括一个应用程序理解工具集、一个反缩写工具集、一个逆向工程工具集和一个影响分析工具集。此外,对机载空间软件和工具软件的适用性要求指导了我们在设置工具评估需求方面的方法。评估过程的核心要素是mes开发的框架,包括评估标准和基于目标/问题/度量(GQM)的方法的使用。这些标准产生了关于每个工具的详细信息。最终结果可以看作是每个标准的得分和显式度量数据的组合。此外,在工具评估中使用了关于应用程序的描述性信息。1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Framework for tool evaluation for a maintenance environment
Tool evaluation forms an essential part of tool development. Unfortunately, there are only a few solutions for this activity. As part of the AMES project, tool evaluation was implemented as part of a more comprehensive framework, used with the development and application of several AMES tools for application maintenance. These included an application understanding tool-set, a disabbreviation tool, a reverse-engineering tool and an impact analysis tool-set. In addition, the requirement for applicability both to on-board space software and to tool software has directed our approach in setting requirements for tools evaluation. The central element of the evaluation process was an AMES-developed framework including evaluation criteria and the use of a goal/question/metrics (GQM) based approach. The criteria have produced detailed information about each tool. The final result can be regarded as a combination of the score for each criterion and explicit metrics data. In addition, descriptive information about applications was used in tool evaluation. 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.