东欧国家政治制度的比较分析:混合和专制政治实践的相关性(1991-2016)

Zbigniew Białobłocki
{"title":"东欧国家政治制度的比较分析:混合和专制政治实践的相关性(1991-2016)","authors":"Zbigniew Białobłocki","doi":"10.59861/ansgk.2353-8392.2016.2.pp255-270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is dedicated to comparative analyzing political regimes in Eastern European countries and making correlation of their hybrid and authoritarian political practices in 1991-2016. The researcher used such methods of analysis of political regimes as “Freedom in the World”, “Nations in Transit”, Vanhanen scheme, Democracy Index of “The Economist Intelligence Unit”, project “Polity IV” and so on. As a result it was mapped all received effective data of divergent comparative methods of democracy and autocracy assessment, on the basis of which the author held their correlation in terms of common and distinctive findings and displayed adjacent/coupled design for understanding political regimes in Eastern Europe.","PeriodicalId":270857,"journal":{"name":"Studium Europy Środkowej i Wschodniej","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of political regimes in Eastern European Countries: correlation of hybrid and authoritarian political practices (1991-2016)\",\"authors\":\"Zbigniew Białobłocki\",\"doi\":\"10.59861/ansgk.2353-8392.2016.2.pp255-270\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article is dedicated to comparative analyzing political regimes in Eastern European countries and making correlation of their hybrid and authoritarian political practices in 1991-2016. The researcher used such methods of analysis of political regimes as “Freedom in the World”, “Nations in Transit”, Vanhanen scheme, Democracy Index of “The Economist Intelligence Unit”, project “Polity IV” and so on. As a result it was mapped all received effective data of divergent comparative methods of democracy and autocracy assessment, on the basis of which the author held their correlation in terms of common and distinctive findings and displayed adjacent/coupled design for understanding political regimes in Eastern Europe.\",\"PeriodicalId\":270857,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studium Europy Środkowej i Wschodniej\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studium Europy Środkowej i Wschodniej\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59861/ansgk.2353-8392.2016.2.pp255-270\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studium Europy Środkowej i Wschodniej","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59861/ansgk.2353-8392.2016.2.pp255-270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文致力于对1991-2016年东欧国家的政治制度进行比较分析,并将其混合和专制政治实践进行相关性分析。研究者使用了“世界自由”、“过境国家”、Vanhanen方案、“经济学人智库”民主指数、“政体IV”项目等政治制度分析方法。因此,它绘制了所有收到的民主和专制评估的不同比较方法的有效数据,在此基础上,作者根据共同和独特的发现持有它们的相关性,并展示了理解东欧政治制度的相邻/耦合设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative analysis of political regimes in Eastern European Countries: correlation of hybrid and authoritarian political practices (1991-2016)
The article is dedicated to comparative analyzing political regimes in Eastern European countries and making correlation of their hybrid and authoritarian political practices in 1991-2016. The researcher used such methods of analysis of political regimes as “Freedom in the World”, “Nations in Transit”, Vanhanen scheme, Democracy Index of “The Economist Intelligence Unit”, project “Polity IV” and so on. As a result it was mapped all received effective data of divergent comparative methods of democracy and autocracy assessment, on the basis of which the author held their correlation in terms of common and distinctive findings and displayed adjacent/coupled design for understanding political regimes in Eastern Europe.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信