基于失效物理的失效模式数量优化设计分析

V. Loll
{"title":"基于失效物理的失效模式数量优化设计分析","authors":"V. Loll","doi":"10.1109/RAMS.2008.4925789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Design for reliability requires a different approach from failure reporting and corrective action system (FRACAS) and test, analyze and fix (TAAF) both of which are tools for reliability improvement of already designed hardware. The physics of failure analysis approach should be used focusing on each failure mode separately. Through a step by step design analysis and test process, the number of potential failure modes should be reduced. As many failure modes as possible should be mitigated by appropriate design changes and the remaining failure modes should be controlled through adequate design stress vs. strength margins. The failure modes with insufficient margins (meaning high likelihood of occurrence in the time of interest) should be extensively analyzed and tested to ensure that they do not contribute to an unacceptable number of failures in the field. The use of this method requires that the equipment manufacturer also actively collect and list failure modes for previous products as well as for components, materials and processes.","PeriodicalId":143940,"journal":{"name":"2008 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing the number of failure modes for design analysis based on physics of failure\",\"authors\":\"V. Loll\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RAMS.2008.4925789\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Design for reliability requires a different approach from failure reporting and corrective action system (FRACAS) and test, analyze and fix (TAAF) both of which are tools for reliability improvement of already designed hardware. The physics of failure analysis approach should be used focusing on each failure mode separately. Through a step by step design analysis and test process, the number of potential failure modes should be reduced. As many failure modes as possible should be mitigated by appropriate design changes and the remaining failure modes should be controlled through adequate design stress vs. strength margins. The failure modes with insufficient margins (meaning high likelihood of occurrence in the time of interest) should be extensively analyzed and tested to ensure that they do not contribute to an unacceptable number of failures in the field. The use of this method requires that the equipment manufacturer also actively collect and list failure modes for previous products as well as for components, materials and processes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143940,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.2008.4925789\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.2008.4925789","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

可靠性设计需要不同于故障报告和纠正措施系统(FRACAS)和测试、分析和修复(TAAF)的方法,这两种方法都是提高已设计硬件可靠性的工具。失效分析的物理方法应分别关注每种失效模式。通过一步一步的设计分析和试验过程,应减少潜在失效模式的数量。尽可能多的失效模式应该通过适当的设计变更来减轻,剩余的失效模式应该通过足够的设计应力与强度裕度来控制。对于余量不足的失效模式(即在相关时间内发生的可能性很高),应进行广泛的分析和测试,以确保它们不会导致现场不可接受的故障数量。使用这种方法要求设备制造商也积极收集和列出以前产品以及部件,材料和工艺的失效模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimizing the number of failure modes for design analysis based on physics of failure
Design for reliability requires a different approach from failure reporting and corrective action system (FRACAS) and test, analyze and fix (TAAF) both of which are tools for reliability improvement of already designed hardware. The physics of failure analysis approach should be used focusing on each failure mode separately. Through a step by step design analysis and test process, the number of potential failure modes should be reduced. As many failure modes as possible should be mitigated by appropriate design changes and the remaining failure modes should be controlled through adequate design stress vs. strength margins. The failure modes with insufficient margins (meaning high likelihood of occurrence in the time of interest) should be extensively analyzed and tested to ensure that they do not contribute to an unacceptable number of failures in the field. The use of this method requires that the equipment manufacturer also actively collect and list failure modes for previous products as well as for components, materials and processes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信