语义地图作为词汇发展的教学策略

M. Udaya
{"title":"语义地图作为词汇发展的教学策略","authors":"M. Udaya","doi":"10.46827/ejel.v6i5.4095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Semantic maps ensure a high potential to facilitate enhanced quality of understanding words. English as second language learners are often presented with new English vocabulary items that are often pre-organized in sets of semantically related words. However, there is an assumption that word grouping facilitates activities for vocabulary learning and no empirical justification supports employing this teaching technique. This study aims to examine to what extent semantic relatedness influences ESL vocabulary recall and retention for middle school students of Telangana. The current study was conducted with 30 seventh-grade students over six weeks. Learners were divided into two groups to compare the effects of presenting semantic maps (retention, recall) and wordlists (recognition, cued recall) for reading comprehension activities. The results reveal that both teaching strategies positively affect vocabulary recall and retention. Between these two strategies, semantic mapping yields better results on recall. The difference between the groups explains from the perspective of information process theory and memory model. Lastly, significant learning and the effectiveness of semantic maps were found in the experiment group.  Article visualizations:","PeriodicalId":226132,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of English Language Teaching","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"USING SEMANTIC MAPS AS A TEACHING STRATEGY FOR VOCABULARY DEVELOPMENT\",\"authors\":\"M. Udaya\",\"doi\":\"10.46827/ejel.v6i5.4095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Semantic maps ensure a high potential to facilitate enhanced quality of understanding words. English as second language learners are often presented with new English vocabulary items that are often pre-organized in sets of semantically related words. However, there is an assumption that word grouping facilitates activities for vocabulary learning and no empirical justification supports employing this teaching technique. This study aims to examine to what extent semantic relatedness influences ESL vocabulary recall and retention for middle school students of Telangana. The current study was conducted with 30 seventh-grade students over six weeks. Learners were divided into two groups to compare the effects of presenting semantic maps (retention, recall) and wordlists (recognition, cued recall) for reading comprehension activities. The results reveal that both teaching strategies positively affect vocabulary recall and retention. Between these two strategies, semantic mapping yields better results on recall. The difference between the groups explains from the perspective of information process theory and memory model. Lastly, significant learning and the effectiveness of semantic maps were found in the experiment group.  Article visualizations:\",\"PeriodicalId\":226132,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of English Language Teaching\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of English Language Teaching\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v6i5.4095\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of English Language Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v6i5.4095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

语义图确保了一个高潜力,以促进提高理解质量的单词。作为第二语言的英语学习者经常会遇到新的英语词汇,这些词汇通常是预先组织成一系列语义相关的单词。然而,有一种假设认为单词分组有助于词汇学习活动,并且没有实证证据支持使用这种教学方法。本研究旨在探讨语义关联对泰伦加纳邦中学生英语词汇回忆和记忆的影响程度。目前的研究是在六周内对30名七年级学生进行的。将学习者分为两组,比较语义图(记忆、回忆)和词表(识别、线索回忆)对阅读理解活动的影响。结果表明,两种教学策略对词汇记忆和记忆都有积极的影响。在这两种策略之间,语义映射在召回上产生了更好的结果。两组之间的差异从信息加工理论和记忆模型的角度来解释。最后,实验组有显著的学习效果和语义图的有效性。可视化条
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
USING SEMANTIC MAPS AS A TEACHING STRATEGY FOR VOCABULARY DEVELOPMENT
Semantic maps ensure a high potential to facilitate enhanced quality of understanding words. English as second language learners are often presented with new English vocabulary items that are often pre-organized in sets of semantically related words. However, there is an assumption that word grouping facilitates activities for vocabulary learning and no empirical justification supports employing this teaching technique. This study aims to examine to what extent semantic relatedness influences ESL vocabulary recall and retention for middle school students of Telangana. The current study was conducted with 30 seventh-grade students over six weeks. Learners were divided into two groups to compare the effects of presenting semantic maps (retention, recall) and wordlists (recognition, cued recall) for reading comprehension activities. The results reveal that both teaching strategies positively affect vocabulary recall and retention. Between these two strategies, semantic mapping yields better results on recall. The difference between the groups explains from the perspective of information process theory and memory model. Lastly, significant learning and the effectiveness of semantic maps were found in the experiment group.  Article visualizations:
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信