独立董事:印度与澳大利亚的比较研究

Sanjiv Chaturvedi, P. Shukla
{"title":"独立董事:印度与澳大利亚的比较研究","authors":"Sanjiv Chaturvedi, P. Shukla","doi":"10.51767/joc1404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The corporate sector plays a very important role in the sustainable growth and development of any economy. Jurisdictions in which corporate are subjected to good governance practices are more prosperous as compared to those having weaker governance. The Board of directors’ independence is considered the cornerstone of corporate governance in any country. Although the concept of independent director emerged in the United States of America as a voluntary measure which was made compulsory there following the management and shareholders agency theory problems commonly referred to as the outsider’s model problems. The giant corporate failures occurring across the various jurisdictions compelled the regulators across the globe to make compulsory provisions regarding the Independent Directors irrespective of the model of corporate governance they were following. Following the initiative taken by the US and UK various other countries also adopted the provision of overhauling and revamping the board structure for ensuring better governance by appointing independent directors. The focus of the present paper is on the study of the regulatory provisions related to the office of the independent director of the two countries i.e., India and Australia belonging to the Asia Pacific region.","PeriodicalId":267407,"journal":{"name":"BSSS Journal of Commerce","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF INDIA AND AUSTRALIA\",\"authors\":\"Sanjiv Chaturvedi, P. Shukla\",\"doi\":\"10.51767/joc1404\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The corporate sector plays a very important role in the sustainable growth and development of any economy. Jurisdictions in which corporate are subjected to good governance practices are more prosperous as compared to those having weaker governance. The Board of directors’ independence is considered the cornerstone of corporate governance in any country. Although the concept of independent director emerged in the United States of America as a voluntary measure which was made compulsory there following the management and shareholders agency theory problems commonly referred to as the outsider’s model problems. The giant corporate failures occurring across the various jurisdictions compelled the regulators across the globe to make compulsory provisions regarding the Independent Directors irrespective of the model of corporate governance they were following. Following the initiative taken by the US and UK various other countries also adopted the provision of overhauling and revamping the board structure for ensuring better governance by appointing independent directors. The focus of the present paper is on the study of the regulatory provisions related to the office of the independent director of the two countries i.e., India and Australia belonging to the Asia Pacific region.\",\"PeriodicalId\":267407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BSSS Journal of Commerce\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BSSS Journal of Commerce\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51767/joc1404\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BSSS Journal of Commerce","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51767/joc1404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

企业部门在任何经济体的可持续增长和发展中都发挥着非常重要的作用。公司实行良好治理的司法管辖区比那些治理较弱的司法管辖区更加繁荣。在任何国家,董事会的独立性都被认为是公司治理的基石。虽然独立董事的概念在美国是作为一种自愿性的措施而出现的,但在美国是随着管理层和股东代理理论问题(通常被称为局外人模式问题)而被强制实施的。在各个司法管辖区发生的巨大公司倒闭迫使全球监管机构对独立董事制定强制性规定,而不管他们遵循的是哪种公司治理模式。继美国和英国的倡议之后,其他一些国家也采取了改革和改造董事会结构的规定,通过任命独立董事来确保更好的治理。本文的重点是对亚太地区的印度和澳大利亚这两个国家的独立董事办公室相关的监管规定进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF INDIA AND AUSTRALIA
The corporate sector plays a very important role in the sustainable growth and development of any economy. Jurisdictions in which corporate are subjected to good governance practices are more prosperous as compared to those having weaker governance. The Board of directors’ independence is considered the cornerstone of corporate governance in any country. Although the concept of independent director emerged in the United States of America as a voluntary measure which was made compulsory there following the management and shareholders agency theory problems commonly referred to as the outsider’s model problems. The giant corporate failures occurring across the various jurisdictions compelled the regulators across the globe to make compulsory provisions regarding the Independent Directors irrespective of the model of corporate governance they were following. Following the initiative taken by the US and UK various other countries also adopted the provision of overhauling and revamping the board structure for ensuring better governance by appointing independent directors. The focus of the present paper is on the study of the regulatory provisions related to the office of the independent director of the two countries i.e., India and Australia belonging to the Asia Pacific region.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信