网络健康社区信任建立机制及其对信息采纳和亲密关系形成的影响

Xin Liu, Ashley A. Bush
{"title":"网络健康社区信任建立机制及其对信息采纳和亲密关系形成的影响","authors":"Xin Liu, Ashley A. Bush","doi":"10.17705/1atrr.00075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study conceptually replicates Fan and Lederman’s (2018) work on trust formation mechanisms in online health communities (OHCs). Social capital theory sets the framework for the research. Contextualized in online health communities (OHCs), it is the content contributors’ task to demonstrate trustworthiness by showing the credibility of the posted content in their previous postings. In contrast, the recipients, rather than the contributors, have to initially perceive trustworthiness in the sense of traditional social capital theory. We adopted the model, hypotheses, measurement, and statistical methods from the original study conducted by Fan and Lederman in 2018. Three out of nine hypotheses in our replication are not consistent with the original study results. The inconsistencies primarily lie in the antecedents of two types of trust. We discuss possible explanations for these discrepancies and suggest additional data and statistical tests to validate our replication results.","PeriodicalId":193731,"journal":{"name":"AIS Transactions on Replication Research","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trust Building Mechanisms in Online Health Communities and Their Impact on Information Adoption and Close Relationship Formation\",\"authors\":\"Xin Liu, Ashley A. Bush\",\"doi\":\"10.17705/1atrr.00075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study conceptually replicates Fan and Lederman’s (2018) work on trust formation mechanisms in online health communities (OHCs). Social capital theory sets the framework for the research. Contextualized in online health communities (OHCs), it is the content contributors’ task to demonstrate trustworthiness by showing the credibility of the posted content in their previous postings. In contrast, the recipients, rather than the contributors, have to initially perceive trustworthiness in the sense of traditional social capital theory. We adopted the model, hypotheses, measurement, and statistical methods from the original study conducted by Fan and Lederman in 2018. Three out of nine hypotheses in our replication are not consistent with the original study results. The inconsistencies primarily lie in the antecedents of two types of trust. We discuss possible explanations for these discrepancies and suggest additional data and statistical tests to validate our replication results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":193731,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AIS Transactions on Replication Research\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AIS Transactions on Replication Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17705/1atrr.00075\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIS Transactions on Replication Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17705/1atrr.00075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究在概念上复制了Fan和Lederman(2018)关于在线健康社区(OHCs)信任形成机制的研究。社会资本理论为研究提供了框架。在在线卫生社区(ohc)的背景下,内容贡献者的任务是通过展示他们以前发布的内容的可信度来证明可信度。相比之下,接受者,而不是贡献者,必须首先在传统社会资本理论的意义上感知可信度。我们采用了Fan和Lederman在2018年进行的原始研究中的模型、假设、测量和统计方法。在我们的重复研究中,9个假设中有3个与原始研究结果不一致。这种不一致主要在于两种信任的前提。我们讨论了这些差异的可能解释,并提出了额外的数据和统计检验来验证我们的复制结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trust Building Mechanisms in Online Health Communities and Their Impact on Information Adoption and Close Relationship Formation
This study conceptually replicates Fan and Lederman’s (2018) work on trust formation mechanisms in online health communities (OHCs). Social capital theory sets the framework for the research. Contextualized in online health communities (OHCs), it is the content contributors’ task to demonstrate trustworthiness by showing the credibility of the posted content in their previous postings. In contrast, the recipients, rather than the contributors, have to initially perceive trustworthiness in the sense of traditional social capital theory. We adopted the model, hypotheses, measurement, and statistical methods from the original study conducted by Fan and Lederman in 2018. Three out of nine hypotheses in our replication are not consistent with the original study results. The inconsistencies primarily lie in the antecedents of two types of trust. We discuss possible explanations for these discrepancies and suggest additional data and statistical tests to validate our replication results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信