管理主义在社会福利领域的出现:以香港为例

Joe C. B. Leung
{"title":"管理主义在社会福利领域的出现:以香港为例","authors":"Joe C. B. Leung","doi":"10.1142/S0219246202000050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) have been the major provider of social welfare services in Hong Kong. Facing an economic downturn, the Hong Kong government decides to enhance cost-effectiveness and accountability in social service through the introduction of market values and business management practices. Market-oriented practices include contracting out, competitive bidding, performance monitoring and lump-sum grant. The appeal of these practices lies in the possibility of lowering costs, but their long-term effect on quality and stability of services is largely uncertain. With the emergence of competition and deregulation in social welfare, NGOs have to face formidable challenges to change their traditional philosophies and mode of operations. The reform implicates the redefinition of the relationship between the government and NGOs, and between social workers and their NGO employers. This paper points out the need to adopt a cautious and consensus approach to introduce welfare reforms. 非政府机构为香港社会福利的最大提供者。 面对经济不景, 香港政府决定引入市场导向和工商管理的措施, 以提高社会服 务的成本效益和问责性。 市场导向的措施包括外判、 投标、 表现监察及一笔过拨款。 这些措施吸引人的地方是可以降 低成本,但长此下去可能影响服务质素和稳定性。 随著出现竞争和取消管制, 非政府机构将要改变其固有的哲学和运作 的方式。 福利改革重新订定政府和非政府机构的关系, 亦改变社工的雇佣的关系。 本文指出在福利改革中, 有需要采 取审慎的态度去寻求共识。","PeriodicalId":328832,"journal":{"name":"The Hong Kong Journal of Social Work","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"31","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE ADVENT OF MANAGERIALISM IN SOCIAL WELFARE: THE CASE OF HONG KONG\",\"authors\":\"Joe C. B. Leung\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/S0219246202000050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) have been the major provider of social welfare services in Hong Kong. Facing an economic downturn, the Hong Kong government decides to enhance cost-effectiveness and accountability in social service through the introduction of market values and business management practices. Market-oriented practices include contracting out, competitive bidding, performance monitoring and lump-sum grant. The appeal of these practices lies in the possibility of lowering costs, but their long-term effect on quality and stability of services is largely uncertain. With the emergence of competition and deregulation in social welfare, NGOs have to face formidable challenges to change their traditional philosophies and mode of operations. The reform implicates the redefinition of the relationship between the government and NGOs, and between social workers and their NGO employers. This paper points out the need to adopt a cautious and consensus approach to introduce welfare reforms. 非政府机构为香港社会福利的最大提供者。 面对经济不景, 香港政府决定引入市场导向和工商管理的措施, 以提高社会服 务的成本效益和问责性。 市场导向的措施包括外判、 投标、 表现监察及一笔过拨款。 这些措施吸引人的地方是可以降 低成本,但长此下去可能影响服务质素和稳定性。 随著出现竞争和取消管制, 非政府机构将要改变其固有的哲学和运作 的方式。 福利改革重新订定政府和非政府机构的关系, 亦改变社工的雇佣的关系。 本文指出在福利改革中, 有需要采 取审慎的态度去寻求共识。\",\"PeriodicalId\":328832,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Hong Kong Journal of Social Work\",\"volume\":\"79 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"31\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Hong Kong Journal of Social Work\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219246202000050\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Hong Kong Journal of Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219246202000050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

摘要

非政府机构一直是本港社会福利服务的主要提供者。面对经济下滑,香港政府决定通过引入市场价值和商业管理实践,提高社会服务的成本效益和问责制。以市场为导向的做法包括外判、竞争性招标、工作表现监测和一次过拨款。这些做法的吸引力在于降低成本的可能性,但它们对服务质量和稳定性的长期影响在很大程度上是不确定的。随着社会福利领域的竞争和放松管制的出现,ngo要改变传统的理念和运作模式,面临着巨大的挑战。改革意味着重新定义政府与非政府组织的关系,以及社会工作者与非政府组织雇主的关系。本文指出,在推行福利改革时,需要采取谨慎和协商一致的方式。非政府机构为香港社会福利的最大提供者。 面对经济不景, 香港政府决定引入市场导向和工商管理的措施, 以提高社会服 务的成本效益和问责性。 市场导向的措施包括外判、 投标、 表现监察及一笔过拨款。 这些措施吸引人的地方是可以降 低成本,但长此下去可能影响服务质素和稳定性。 随著出现竞争和取消管制, 非政府机构将要改变其固有的哲学和运作 的方式。 福利改革重新订定政府和非政府机构的关系, 亦改变社工的雇佣的关系。 本文指出在福利改革中, 有需要采 取审慎的态度去寻求共识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE ADVENT OF MANAGERIALISM IN SOCIAL WELFARE: THE CASE OF HONG KONG
Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) have been the major provider of social welfare services in Hong Kong. Facing an economic downturn, the Hong Kong government decides to enhance cost-effectiveness and accountability in social service through the introduction of market values and business management practices. Market-oriented practices include contracting out, competitive bidding, performance monitoring and lump-sum grant. The appeal of these practices lies in the possibility of lowering costs, but their long-term effect on quality and stability of services is largely uncertain. With the emergence of competition and deregulation in social welfare, NGOs have to face formidable challenges to change their traditional philosophies and mode of operations. The reform implicates the redefinition of the relationship between the government and NGOs, and between social workers and their NGO employers. This paper points out the need to adopt a cautious and consensus approach to introduce welfare reforms. 非政府机构为香港社会福利的最大提供者。 面对经济不景, 香港政府决定引入市场导向和工商管理的措施, 以提高社会服 务的成本效益和问责性。 市场导向的措施包括外判、 投标、 表现监察及一笔过拨款。 这些措施吸引人的地方是可以降 低成本,但长此下去可能影响服务质素和稳定性。 随著出现竞争和取消管制, 非政府机构将要改变其固有的哲学和运作 的方式。 福利改革重新订定政府和非政府机构的关系, 亦改变社工的雇佣的关系。 本文指出在福利改革中, 有需要采 取审慎的态度去寻求共识。
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信