线探针法快速诊断印度耐药结核病准确性的系统评价

B. Suzana, K. Reddy, S. Bhargava, M. Chauhan
{"title":"线探针法快速诊断印度耐药结核病准确性的系统评价","authors":"B. Suzana, K. Reddy, S. Bhargava, M. Chauhan","doi":"10.3126/saarctb.v19i1.39927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Owing to the drastic increase in the number of patients with drug resistant TB around the world, it is important to increase the testing for it. Line probe assay (LPA) is the rapid diagnostic tool to detect drug resistant TB and it was endorsed by WHO for testing first line drugs such as Isoniazid (INH) and Rifampicin (RIF). This systematic review evaluated the accuracy of this LPA by analysing its sensitivity and specificity against the phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (DST) methods like LJ and liquid culture DST. A total of 4774 samples were included in this review from 19 articles. The average sensitivity and specificity for the detection of RIF resistance from 17 articles was 95.79% and 96.71% and for INH resistance it was 89.85% and 97.33% respectively when compared to phenotypic DST. Out of 19 articles included, 2 articles have mentioned the sensitivity and specificity for multi-drug resistant TB (MDR TB) and the average was 98.50 % and 97 % respectively. The accuracy for RIF resistance detection through first line LPA was good and the sensitivity detection for INH was less across the studies. This could be improved further in future generation assays. Our finding supports the use of LPA especially on smear positive specimens but use on smear negative specimens still be considered as studies have shown some interpretable results.","PeriodicalId":175434,"journal":{"name":"SAARC Journal of Tuberculosis, Lung Diseases and HIV/AIDS","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Systematic Review on the Diagnostic Accuracy of Line Probe Assay in the Rapid Diagnosis of Drug Resistant Tuberculosis in Indian Scenario\",\"authors\":\"B. Suzana, K. Reddy, S. Bhargava, M. Chauhan\",\"doi\":\"10.3126/saarctb.v19i1.39927\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Owing to the drastic increase in the number of patients with drug resistant TB around the world, it is important to increase the testing for it. Line probe assay (LPA) is the rapid diagnostic tool to detect drug resistant TB and it was endorsed by WHO for testing first line drugs such as Isoniazid (INH) and Rifampicin (RIF). This systematic review evaluated the accuracy of this LPA by analysing its sensitivity and specificity against the phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (DST) methods like LJ and liquid culture DST. A total of 4774 samples were included in this review from 19 articles. The average sensitivity and specificity for the detection of RIF resistance from 17 articles was 95.79% and 96.71% and for INH resistance it was 89.85% and 97.33% respectively when compared to phenotypic DST. Out of 19 articles included, 2 articles have mentioned the sensitivity and specificity for multi-drug resistant TB (MDR TB) and the average was 98.50 % and 97 % respectively. The accuracy for RIF resistance detection through first line LPA was good and the sensitivity detection for INH was less across the studies. This could be improved further in future generation assays. Our finding supports the use of LPA especially on smear positive specimens but use on smear negative specimens still be considered as studies have shown some interpretable results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":175434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SAARC Journal of Tuberculosis, Lung Diseases and HIV/AIDS\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SAARC Journal of Tuberculosis, Lung Diseases and HIV/AIDS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3126/saarctb.v19i1.39927\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAARC Journal of Tuberculosis, Lung Diseases and HIV/AIDS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/saarctb.v19i1.39927","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于世界各地耐药结核病患者人数急剧增加,因此必须增加对耐药结核病的检测。线探针法(LPA)是检测耐药结核病的快速诊断工具,已得到世卫组织的认可,可用于检测异烟肼(INH)和利福平(RIF)等一线药物。本系统评价通过分析LPA对LJ和液体培养DST等表型药敏试验方法的敏感性和特异性来评价LPA的准确性。本综述共纳入19篇文献的4774份样本。与表型DST相比,17份文献检测RIF耐药的平均灵敏度和特异度分别为95.79%和96.71%,INH耐药的平均灵敏度和特异度分别为89.85%和97.33%。在纳入的19篇文献中,有2篇文献提到了耐多药结核病(MDR TB)的敏感性和特异性,平均分别为98.50%和97%。通过一线LPA检测RIF耐药的准确性较好,但检测INH的灵敏度较低。这可以在未来一代的分析中进一步改进。我们的发现支持LPA的使用,特别是在涂片阳性标本上,但在涂片阴性标本上仍然可以考虑使用,因为研究显示了一些可解释的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Systematic Review on the Diagnostic Accuracy of Line Probe Assay in the Rapid Diagnosis of Drug Resistant Tuberculosis in Indian Scenario
Owing to the drastic increase in the number of patients with drug resistant TB around the world, it is important to increase the testing for it. Line probe assay (LPA) is the rapid diagnostic tool to detect drug resistant TB and it was endorsed by WHO for testing first line drugs such as Isoniazid (INH) and Rifampicin (RIF). This systematic review evaluated the accuracy of this LPA by analysing its sensitivity and specificity against the phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (DST) methods like LJ and liquid culture DST. A total of 4774 samples were included in this review from 19 articles. The average sensitivity and specificity for the detection of RIF resistance from 17 articles was 95.79% and 96.71% and for INH resistance it was 89.85% and 97.33% respectively when compared to phenotypic DST. Out of 19 articles included, 2 articles have mentioned the sensitivity and specificity for multi-drug resistant TB (MDR TB) and the average was 98.50 % and 97 % respectively. The accuracy for RIF resistance detection through first line LPA was good and the sensitivity detection for INH was less across the studies. This could be improved further in future generation assays. Our finding supports the use of LPA especially on smear positive specimens but use on smear negative specimens still be considered as studies have shown some interpretable results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信