交互设计

Daniel Tunkelang
{"title":"交互设计","authors":"Daniel Tunkelang","doi":"10.1145/1559845.1559957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research in information retrieval has focused on presenting the most relevant results to a user in response to a free-text search query. Research in database systems assumes a model where the user enters a formal query, and the results are exactly those the user requested. Neither community has emphasized user interaction—a critical concern for practical information access. As William Goffman noted in the 1960s and Nick Belkin continually reminds us today, the relationship between a document and query, though necessary, is not sufficient to determine relevance—yet ranked retrieval approaches rely heavily or exclusively on this relationship. Meanwhile, recent work on database usability by Jeff Naughton and H.V. Jagadish surfaces the rigidity of database systems that return nothing unless users know how to formulate precise queries. This talk presents human-computer information retrieval (HCIR) as a general approach that addresses some of the key challenges facing both research communities. A vision first put forward by Gary Marchionini, HCIR expects people and systems to work together to implement information access. Such an approach requires rethinking information access not as a matching or ranking problem, but rather as a communication problem. Specifically, we need interfaces that optimize the bidirectional communication between the user and the system, thus optimizing the symbiotic division of labor between the two. This talk reviews the history of HCIR efforts and presents ongoing work to implement the HCIR vision. In particular, it presents an interactive set retrieval approach that responds to queries with an overview of the user's current context and an organized set of options for incremental exploration.","PeriodicalId":344093,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2009 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of data","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"66","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design for interaction\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Tunkelang\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1559845.1559957\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Research in information retrieval has focused on presenting the most relevant results to a user in response to a free-text search query. Research in database systems assumes a model where the user enters a formal query, and the results are exactly those the user requested. Neither community has emphasized user interaction—a critical concern for practical information access. As William Goffman noted in the 1960s and Nick Belkin continually reminds us today, the relationship between a document and query, though necessary, is not sufficient to determine relevance—yet ranked retrieval approaches rely heavily or exclusively on this relationship. Meanwhile, recent work on database usability by Jeff Naughton and H.V. Jagadish surfaces the rigidity of database systems that return nothing unless users know how to formulate precise queries. This talk presents human-computer information retrieval (HCIR) as a general approach that addresses some of the key challenges facing both research communities. A vision first put forward by Gary Marchionini, HCIR expects people and systems to work together to implement information access. Such an approach requires rethinking information access not as a matching or ranking problem, but rather as a communication problem. Specifically, we need interfaces that optimize the bidirectional communication between the user and the system, thus optimizing the symbiotic division of labor between the two. This talk reviews the history of HCIR efforts and presents ongoing work to implement the HCIR vision. In particular, it presents an interactive set retrieval approach that responds to queries with an overview of the user's current context and an organized set of options for incremental exploration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":344093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2009 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of data\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"66\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2009 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of data\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1559845.1559957\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2009 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of data","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1559845.1559957","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 66

摘要

信息检索的研究主要集中在向用户提供最相关的结果以响应自由文本搜索查询。数据库系统的研究假设一个模型,用户输入一个正式的查询,结果就是用户所请求的。这两个社区都没有强调用户交互——这是实际信息访问的关键问题。正如威廉·戈夫曼(William Goffman)在20世纪60年代所指出的,以及尼克·贝尔金(Nick Belkin)今天不断提醒我们的那样,文档和查询之间的关系虽然是必要的,但不足以确定相关性——而排序检索方法严重依赖或完全依赖于这种关系。与此同时,Jeff Naughton和H.V. Jagadish最近对数据库可用性的研究揭示了数据库系统的僵化,除非用户知道如何制定精确的查询,否则数据库系统不会返回任何结果。本演讲将介绍人机信息检索(HCIR)作为解决两个研究团体面临的一些关键挑战的一般方法。这是Gary Marchionini首先提出的愿景,HCIR期望人员和系统共同努力实现信息访问。这种方法需要重新考虑信息访问,而不是将其视为匹配或排序问题,而是将其视为沟通问题。具体来说,我们需要优化用户和系统之间双向通信的接口,从而优化两者之间的共生分工。本次演讲回顾了HCIR工作的历史,并介绍了为实现HCIR愿景而正在进行的工作。特别是,它提出了一种交互式集检索方法,该方法通过用户当前上下文的概述和一组有组织的选项来响应查询,以便进行增量探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Design for interaction
Research in information retrieval has focused on presenting the most relevant results to a user in response to a free-text search query. Research in database systems assumes a model where the user enters a formal query, and the results are exactly those the user requested. Neither community has emphasized user interaction—a critical concern for practical information access. As William Goffman noted in the 1960s and Nick Belkin continually reminds us today, the relationship between a document and query, though necessary, is not sufficient to determine relevance—yet ranked retrieval approaches rely heavily or exclusively on this relationship. Meanwhile, recent work on database usability by Jeff Naughton and H.V. Jagadish surfaces the rigidity of database systems that return nothing unless users know how to formulate precise queries. This talk presents human-computer information retrieval (HCIR) as a general approach that addresses some of the key challenges facing both research communities. A vision first put forward by Gary Marchionini, HCIR expects people and systems to work together to implement information access. Such an approach requires rethinking information access not as a matching or ranking problem, but rather as a communication problem. Specifically, we need interfaces that optimize the bidirectional communication between the user and the system, thus optimizing the symbiotic division of labor between the two. This talk reviews the history of HCIR efforts and presents ongoing work to implement the HCIR vision. In particular, it presents an interactive set retrieval approach that responds to queries with an overview of the user's current context and an organized set of options for incremental exploration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信