{"title":"德国的图书馆与民主。公众对专业人士的看法","authors":"H. Hobohm","doi":"10.1515/9783110636628-013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study in the context of project ALMPUB “Archives, Libraries, Museums as Public Sphere Institutions in the Digital Age” takes as its starting point the fundamental criticism voiced by Paul Jaeger and others (2013), namely that discussions on the relationship between libraries and democracy lack empirical evidence. This takes into account theNordic approach that considers the three key institutions of knowledge – libraries, archives and museums – together. Project partner Håkon Larsen provides an overall conceptual explanation of why these three institutions are comparable as public spaces and arenas of political discourse (Larson 2018). The current research landscape has been explained in a report published in the Journal of Documentation and the results of representative population surveys in six countries are given in another recent article in the same journal (Audunson et al. 2019a, 2019b). The initial analyses of the survey of occupational fields were presented at CoLIS 10 (the conference “Conceptions of Library and Information Science” taking place every three years) in Slovenia in June 2019 (Audunson, Hobohm, Tóth 2019, see also Audunson, Hobohm and Tóth, this volume). The starting point of the European project with partners from more than six countries was to establish the extent to which national populations attribute different roles to libraries in comparison to other countries, but also in comparison to the self-perceptionsof libraryprofessionals in each respective country. Theproject is explained in more depth in the present volume. The starting points are similar projects by Ragnar Audunson and his team who for over two decades have dedicated themselves to understanding the role of the public library as a place in society (cf. e.g. Audunson 2005). The European network “Libraries in Urban Space” can be traced back to an interdisciplinary conference in Potsdam in 2012 with the title “The City of Flows – Interdisciplinary Perspectives on the Digital City in Analogue Spaces”.","PeriodicalId":341262,"journal":{"name":"Libraries, Archives and Museums as Democratic Spaces in a Digital Age","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"13 Libraries and Democracy in Germany. As Perceived by the Public in Contrast to the Professionals\",\"authors\":\"H. Hobohm\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/9783110636628-013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study in the context of project ALMPUB “Archives, Libraries, Museums as Public Sphere Institutions in the Digital Age” takes as its starting point the fundamental criticism voiced by Paul Jaeger and others (2013), namely that discussions on the relationship between libraries and democracy lack empirical evidence. This takes into account theNordic approach that considers the three key institutions of knowledge – libraries, archives and museums – together. Project partner Håkon Larsen provides an overall conceptual explanation of why these three institutions are comparable as public spaces and arenas of political discourse (Larson 2018). The current research landscape has been explained in a report published in the Journal of Documentation and the results of representative population surveys in six countries are given in another recent article in the same journal (Audunson et al. 2019a, 2019b). The initial analyses of the survey of occupational fields were presented at CoLIS 10 (the conference “Conceptions of Library and Information Science” taking place every three years) in Slovenia in June 2019 (Audunson, Hobohm, Tóth 2019, see also Audunson, Hobohm and Tóth, this volume). The starting point of the European project with partners from more than six countries was to establish the extent to which national populations attribute different roles to libraries in comparison to other countries, but also in comparison to the self-perceptionsof libraryprofessionals in each respective country. Theproject is explained in more depth in the present volume. The starting points are similar projects by Ragnar Audunson and his team who for over two decades have dedicated themselves to understanding the role of the public library as a place in society (cf. e.g. Audunson 2005). The European network “Libraries in Urban Space” can be traced back to an interdisciplinary conference in Potsdam in 2012 with the title “The City of Flows – Interdisciplinary Perspectives on the Digital City in Analogue Spaces”.\",\"PeriodicalId\":341262,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Libraries, Archives and Museums as Democratic Spaces in a Digital Age\",\"volume\":\"86 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Libraries, Archives and Museums as Democratic Spaces in a Digital Age\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110636628-013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Libraries, Archives and Museums as Democratic Spaces in a Digital Age","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110636628-013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
本研究在ALMPUB项目“档案馆、图书馆、博物馆作为数字时代的公共领域机构”的背景下,以Paul Jaeger等人(2013)提出的基本批评为出发点,即关于图书馆与民主之间关系的讨论缺乏经验证据。这考虑到了北欧的方法,它将三个关键的知识机构——图书馆、档案馆和博物馆——放在一起考虑。项目合作伙伴h kon Larsen对为什么这三个机构作为公共空间和政治话语场所具有可比性进行了总体概念性解释(Larson 2018)。在《文献杂志》上发表的一篇报告中解释了目前的研究现状,在同一杂志上发表的另一篇文章中给出了六个国家代表性人口调查的结果(Audunson等人,2019a, 2019b)。职业领域调查的初步分析于2019年6月在斯洛文尼亚举行的CoLIS 10(每三年举行一次的“图书馆和信息科学概念”会议)上发表(Audunson, Hobohm, Tóth 2019,另见Audunson, Hobohm和Tóth,本卷)。与来自六个以上国家的合作伙伴一起,欧洲项目的出发点是确定与其他国家相比,各国人民赋予图书馆不同角色的程度,同时也与每个国家图书馆专业人员的自我认知进行比较。这个项目在本卷中有更深入的解释。出发点是Ragnar Audunson和他的团队的类似项目,他们二十多年来一直致力于理解公共图书馆作为社会场所的作用(e.g. Audunson 2005)。欧洲“城市空间中的图书馆”网络可以追溯到2012年波茨坦的一次跨学科会议,会议的主题是“流动的城市——模拟空间中的数字城市的跨学科视角”。
13 Libraries and Democracy in Germany. As Perceived by the Public in Contrast to the Professionals
This study in the context of project ALMPUB “Archives, Libraries, Museums as Public Sphere Institutions in the Digital Age” takes as its starting point the fundamental criticism voiced by Paul Jaeger and others (2013), namely that discussions on the relationship between libraries and democracy lack empirical evidence. This takes into account theNordic approach that considers the three key institutions of knowledge – libraries, archives and museums – together. Project partner Håkon Larsen provides an overall conceptual explanation of why these three institutions are comparable as public spaces and arenas of political discourse (Larson 2018). The current research landscape has been explained in a report published in the Journal of Documentation and the results of representative population surveys in six countries are given in another recent article in the same journal (Audunson et al. 2019a, 2019b). The initial analyses of the survey of occupational fields were presented at CoLIS 10 (the conference “Conceptions of Library and Information Science” taking place every three years) in Slovenia in June 2019 (Audunson, Hobohm, Tóth 2019, see also Audunson, Hobohm and Tóth, this volume). The starting point of the European project with partners from more than six countries was to establish the extent to which national populations attribute different roles to libraries in comparison to other countries, but also in comparison to the self-perceptionsof libraryprofessionals in each respective country. Theproject is explained in more depth in the present volume. The starting points are similar projects by Ragnar Audunson and his team who for over two decades have dedicated themselves to understanding the role of the public library as a place in society (cf. e.g. Audunson 2005). The European network “Libraries in Urban Space” can be traced back to an interdisciplinary conference in Potsdam in 2012 with the title “The City of Flows – Interdisciplinary Perspectives on the Digital City in Analogue Spaces”.