衡量市政借贷成本:成本信息缺失如何影响利率计算

Bill Simonsen, Mark D. Robbins
{"title":"衡量市政借贷成本:成本信息缺失如何影响利率计算","authors":"Bill Simonsen, Mark D. Robbins","doi":"10.1111/1540-5850.00065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"State and local governments issue billions of dollars' worth of municipal bonds every year. At the same time, no single comprehensive measure has been available for debt managers to apply that fully captures their borrowing costs. In this article we compare a comprehensive measure called the internal financing rate with true interest cost (TIC), applying both to bond sales in Oregon in 1999. We find that the two measures produce statistically and practically different results and conclude that TIC typically understates the real cost of borrowing experienced by issuers. TIC is therefore a flawed measure for reporting results to administrators, elected officials, and the public. It is also an inappropriate measure for evaluating the performance of public debt managers.","PeriodicalId":135866,"journal":{"name":"Wiley-Blackwell: Public Budgeting & Finance","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring Municipal Borrowing Costs: How Missing Cost Information Biases Interest Rate Calculations\",\"authors\":\"Bill Simonsen, Mark D. Robbins\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1540-5850.00065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"State and local governments issue billions of dollars' worth of municipal bonds every year. At the same time, no single comprehensive measure has been available for debt managers to apply that fully captures their borrowing costs. In this article we compare a comprehensive measure called the internal financing rate with true interest cost (TIC), applying both to bond sales in Oregon in 1999. We find that the two measures produce statistically and practically different results and conclude that TIC typically understates the real cost of borrowing experienced by issuers. TIC is therefore a flawed measure for reporting results to administrators, elected officials, and the public. It is also an inappropriate measure for evaluating the performance of public debt managers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":135866,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wiley-Blackwell: Public Budgeting & Finance\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wiley-Blackwell: Public Budgeting & Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5850.00065\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiley-Blackwell: Public Budgeting & Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5850.00065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

州和地方政府每年发行价值数十亿美元的市政债券。与此同时,没有一种单一的综合措施可供债务管理机构采用,以充分反映其借贷成本。在本文中,我们比较了内部融资利率和真实利息成本(TIC)的综合衡量标准,并将两者应用于1999年俄勒冈州的债券销售。我们发现这两种方法在统计和实践上产生了不同的结果,并得出结论,TIC通常低估了发行人所经历的实际借贷成本。因此,在向行政人员、民选官员和公众报告结果时,议会投票是一个有缺陷的措施。这也是一个不恰当的衡量公共债务管理者业绩的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measuring Municipal Borrowing Costs: How Missing Cost Information Biases Interest Rate Calculations
State and local governments issue billions of dollars' worth of municipal bonds every year. At the same time, no single comprehensive measure has been available for debt managers to apply that fully captures their borrowing costs. In this article we compare a comprehensive measure called the internal financing rate with true interest cost (TIC), applying both to bond sales in Oregon in 1999. We find that the two measures produce statistically and practically different results and conclude that TIC typically understates the real cost of borrowing experienced by issuers. TIC is therefore a flawed measure for reporting results to administrators, elected officials, and the public. It is also an inappropriate measure for evaluating the performance of public debt managers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信