目标跟踪与低分辨率激光雷达和雷达融合,比较

Pragyan Dahal, S. Mentasti, Hafeez Husain Cholakkal, S. Arrigoni, F. Braghin, Matteo Matteucci, F. Cheli
{"title":"目标跟踪与低分辨率激光雷达和雷达融合,比较","authors":"Pragyan Dahal, S. Mentasti, Hafeez Husain Cholakkal, S. Arrigoni, F. Braghin, Matteo Matteucci, F. Cheli","doi":"10.23919/AEIT56783.2022.9951730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tracking Obstacles with low-resolution Lidar for Autonomous Driving applications is a challenging task. Learning-based models for object detection are not suitable due to the high rate of missed detections and false positives. In this work, we study two different alternatives to this approach. The first algorithm is based on Occupancy Grid detections which employs a rectangular measurement model in the tracking recursion. It is developed using the Global Nearest Neighbour (GNN) association solver and Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) estimator. A high-level fusion of the Lidar detections and Radar detections is performed. The second algorithm is developed using Extended Object Tracking (EOT) recursion, which skips the detection step entirely and utilizes fused representation of Lidar measurement points and Radar detections. It is based on Gaussian Mixture Probability Hypothesis Density (GM-PHD) filter and uses a spline measurement model. A comparative study of these algorithms with the Point Object Tracking (POT) algorithm developed with a learning-based Lidar detector is shown. The comparative study and the algorithm validation are done on the experimental data collected at the Monza Eni Circuit. (The Monza dataset will be released in conjunction with this paper)","PeriodicalId":253384,"journal":{"name":"2022 AEIT International Annual Conference (AEIT)","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Object tracking with low resolution Lidar and Radar fusion, a comparison\",\"authors\":\"Pragyan Dahal, S. Mentasti, Hafeez Husain Cholakkal, S. Arrigoni, F. Braghin, Matteo Matteucci, F. Cheli\",\"doi\":\"10.23919/AEIT56783.2022.9951730\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Tracking Obstacles with low-resolution Lidar for Autonomous Driving applications is a challenging task. Learning-based models for object detection are not suitable due to the high rate of missed detections and false positives. In this work, we study two different alternatives to this approach. The first algorithm is based on Occupancy Grid detections which employs a rectangular measurement model in the tracking recursion. It is developed using the Global Nearest Neighbour (GNN) association solver and Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) estimator. A high-level fusion of the Lidar detections and Radar detections is performed. The second algorithm is developed using Extended Object Tracking (EOT) recursion, which skips the detection step entirely and utilizes fused representation of Lidar measurement points and Radar detections. It is based on Gaussian Mixture Probability Hypothesis Density (GM-PHD) filter and uses a spline measurement model. A comparative study of these algorithms with the Point Object Tracking (POT) algorithm developed with a learning-based Lidar detector is shown. The comparative study and the algorithm validation are done on the experimental data collected at the Monza Eni Circuit. (The Monza dataset will be released in conjunction with this paper)\",\"PeriodicalId\":253384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 AEIT International Annual Conference (AEIT)\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 AEIT International Annual Conference (AEIT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23919/AEIT56783.2022.9951730\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 AEIT International Annual Conference (AEIT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/AEIT56783.2022.9951730","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在自动驾驶应用中使用低分辨率激光雷达跟踪障碍物是一项具有挑战性的任务。基于学习的目标检测模型由于检测漏检率高和误报率高而不适合。在这项工作中,我们研究了这种方法的两种不同的替代方案。第一种算法是基于占用网格检测,在跟踪递归中采用矩形测量模型。该算法采用全局最近邻(GNN)关联求解器和扩展卡尔曼滤波(EKF)估计器。进行了激光雷达探测和雷达探测的高水平融合。第二种算法是使用扩展目标跟踪(EOT)递归开发的,它完全跳过了检测步骤,并利用激光雷达测量点和雷达检测的融合表示。该方法基于高斯混合概率假设密度(GM-PHD)滤波,采用样条测量模型。将这些算法与基于学习的激光雷达探测器开发的点目标跟踪(POT)算法进行了比较研究。在蒙扎埃尼赛道的实验数据上进行了对比研究和算法验证。(Monza数据集将与本文一起发布)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Object tracking with low resolution Lidar and Radar fusion, a comparison
Tracking Obstacles with low-resolution Lidar for Autonomous Driving applications is a challenging task. Learning-based models for object detection are not suitable due to the high rate of missed detections and false positives. In this work, we study two different alternatives to this approach. The first algorithm is based on Occupancy Grid detections which employs a rectangular measurement model in the tracking recursion. It is developed using the Global Nearest Neighbour (GNN) association solver and Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) estimator. A high-level fusion of the Lidar detections and Radar detections is performed. The second algorithm is developed using Extended Object Tracking (EOT) recursion, which skips the detection step entirely and utilizes fused representation of Lidar measurement points and Radar detections. It is based on Gaussian Mixture Probability Hypothesis Density (GM-PHD) filter and uses a spline measurement model. A comparative study of these algorithms with the Point Object Tracking (POT) algorithm developed with a learning-based Lidar detector is shown. The comparative study and the algorithm validation are done on the experimental data collected at the Monza Eni Circuit. (The Monza dataset will be released in conjunction with this paper)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信