试图理解PEG

Roman R. Redziejowski
{"title":"试图理解PEG","authors":"Roman R. Redziejowski","doi":"10.3233/FI-2018-1638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Parsing Expression Grammar (PEG) encodes a recursive-descent parser with limited backtracking. Its properties are useful in many applications, but it is not well understood as a language definition tool. In its appearance, PEG is almost identical to a grammar in the Extended Backus-Naur Form (EBNF), and one may expect it to define the same language. But, due to the limited backtracking, PEG may reject some strings defined by EBNF, which gives an impression of PEG being unpredictable. We note that for some grammars, the limited backtracking is ”efficient”, in the sense that it exhausts all possibilities. A PEG with efficient backtracking should therefore be easy to understand. There is no general algorithm to check if the grammar has efficient backtracking, but it can be often checked by inspection. The paper outlines an interactive tool to facilitate such inspection.","PeriodicalId":286395,"journal":{"name":"International Workshop on Concurrency, Specification and Programming","volume":"131 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trying to Understand PEG\",\"authors\":\"Roman R. Redziejowski\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/FI-2018-1638\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Parsing Expression Grammar (PEG) encodes a recursive-descent parser with limited backtracking. Its properties are useful in many applications, but it is not well understood as a language definition tool. In its appearance, PEG is almost identical to a grammar in the Extended Backus-Naur Form (EBNF), and one may expect it to define the same language. But, due to the limited backtracking, PEG may reject some strings defined by EBNF, which gives an impression of PEG being unpredictable. We note that for some grammars, the limited backtracking is ”efficient”, in the sense that it exhausts all possibilities. A PEG with efficient backtracking should therefore be easy to understand. There is no general algorithm to check if the grammar has efficient backtracking, but it can be often checked by inspection. The paper outlines an interactive tool to facilitate such inspection.\",\"PeriodicalId\":286395,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Workshop on Concurrency, Specification and Programming\",\"volume\":\"131 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Workshop on Concurrency, Specification and Programming\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/FI-2018-1638\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Workshop on Concurrency, Specification and Programming","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/FI-2018-1638","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

解析表达式语法(PEG)编码具有有限回溯的递归下降解析器。它的属性在许多应用程序中都很有用,但作为一种语言定义工具,它还没有得到很好的理解。从外观上看,PEG几乎与扩展Backus-Naur形式(EBNF)中的语法相同,人们可能期望它定义相同的语言。但是,由于回溯的限制,PEG可能会拒绝EBNF定义的一些字符串,这给人一种PEG不可预测的印象。我们注意到,对于某些语法,有限的回溯是“有效的”,因为它耗尽了所有的可能性。因此,具有有效回溯的PEG应该很容易理解。没有通用的算法来检查语法是否具有有效的回溯,但通常可以通过检查来检查。该文件概述了一种促进这种检查的交互式工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trying to Understand PEG
Parsing Expression Grammar (PEG) encodes a recursive-descent parser with limited backtracking. Its properties are useful in many applications, but it is not well understood as a language definition tool. In its appearance, PEG is almost identical to a grammar in the Extended Backus-Naur Form (EBNF), and one may expect it to define the same language. But, due to the limited backtracking, PEG may reject some strings defined by EBNF, which gives an impression of PEG being unpredictable. We note that for some grammars, the limited backtracking is ”efficient”, in the sense that it exhausts all possibilities. A PEG with efficient backtracking should therefore be easy to understand. There is no general algorithm to check if the grammar has efficient backtracking, but it can be often checked by inspection. The paper outlines an interactive tool to facilitate such inspection.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信