[基于肺部感染程度的气管切开清洁与无菌护理技术的研究]。

Q4 Nursing
Nosileftiki Pub Date : 1992-07-01
A Sachine-Kardase, Z Bardake, A Basileiadou, S Dimpinoyde, A Ouxoyne, O Patse
{"title":"[基于肺部感染程度的气管切开清洁与无菌护理技术的研究]。","authors":"A Sachine-Kardase,&nbsp;Z Bardake,&nbsp;A Basileiadou,&nbsp;S Dimpinoyde,&nbsp;A Ouxoyne,&nbsp;O Patse","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this research study was to determine whether the clean technique of tracheotomy care is the same, or more, secure from the aseptic, by testing the difference in the level of postoperative pulmonary infection between tracheotomized patients receiving aseptic and those receiving clean tracheotomy care. The sample consisted of 103 patients with tracheotomy (transient or permanent) from ENT or IC units of four big hospitals of Athens. The level of the patient's pulmonary infection was defined using the Weighted Level of Pulmonary Infection Tool, which was constructed especially for this research study. The data were analysed using the x2 statistical test, and the coefficients phi, Cramer's V and Kendall's, while, with the same statistics, the relationship between certain important external variables and the dependent variable was examined. The findings indicated that no statistically significant difference exists between clean and aseptic technique as to the level of pulmonary infection when used for tracheotomy postoperative care of tracheotomized patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":39008,"journal":{"name":"Nosileftiki","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Study of clean versus aseptic technique of tracheotomy care based on the level of pulmonary infection].\",\"authors\":\"A Sachine-Kardase,&nbsp;Z Bardake,&nbsp;A Basileiadou,&nbsp;S Dimpinoyde,&nbsp;A Ouxoyne,&nbsp;O Patse\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The purpose of this research study was to determine whether the clean technique of tracheotomy care is the same, or more, secure from the aseptic, by testing the difference in the level of postoperative pulmonary infection between tracheotomized patients receiving aseptic and those receiving clean tracheotomy care. The sample consisted of 103 patients with tracheotomy (transient or permanent) from ENT or IC units of four big hospitals of Athens. The level of the patient's pulmonary infection was defined using the Weighted Level of Pulmonary Infection Tool, which was constructed especially for this research study. The data were analysed using the x2 statistical test, and the coefficients phi, Cramer's V and Kendall's, while, with the same statistics, the relationship between certain important external variables and the dependent variable was examined. The findings indicated that no statistically significant difference exists between clean and aseptic technique as to the level of pulmonary infection when used for tracheotomy postoperative care of tracheotomized patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39008,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nosileftiki\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nosileftiki\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nosileftiki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是通过检测无菌气管切开术患者与清洁气管切开术患者术后肺部感染水平的差异,来确定气管切开术护理的清洁技术是否相同或更安全。样本包括来自雅典四家大医院的耳鼻喉科或内窥科的103例气管切开术患者(暂时性或永久性)。采用专为本研究构建的肺部感染加权水平工具(Weighted level of pulmonary infection Tool)确定患者的肺部感染水平。采用x2统计检验对数据进行分析,并对系数phi、Cramer’s V和Kendall’s进行检验,同时,在相同的统计量下,对某些重要的外部变量与因变量之间的关系进行检验。结果表明,清洁技术与无菌技术在气管切开术患者术后护理中肺部感染水平无统计学差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Study of clean versus aseptic technique of tracheotomy care based on the level of pulmonary infection].

The purpose of this research study was to determine whether the clean technique of tracheotomy care is the same, or more, secure from the aseptic, by testing the difference in the level of postoperative pulmonary infection between tracheotomized patients receiving aseptic and those receiving clean tracheotomy care. The sample consisted of 103 patients with tracheotomy (transient or permanent) from ENT or IC units of four big hospitals of Athens. The level of the patient's pulmonary infection was defined using the Weighted Level of Pulmonary Infection Tool, which was constructed especially for this research study. The data were analysed using the x2 statistical test, and the coefficients phi, Cramer's V and Kendall's, while, with the same statistics, the relationship between certain important external variables and the dependent variable was examined. The findings indicated that no statistically significant difference exists between clean and aseptic technique as to the level of pulmonary infection when used for tracheotomy postoperative care of tracheotomized patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nosileftiki
Nosileftiki Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信