内镜逆行胆管造影(ERCP)中不同透视技术的辐射暴露比较

Saleh A. Alghsoon, Khaled Shaban, Altaf Khan, F. Almeshal., S. O. Balogun, M. Y. Memon, A. Swied
{"title":"内镜逆行胆管造影(ERCP)中不同透视技术的辐射暴露比较","authors":"Saleh A. Alghsoon, Khaled Shaban, Altaf Khan, F. Almeshal., S. O. Balogun, M. Y. Memon, A. Swied","doi":"10.36401/isim-20-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a relatively new endoscopic procedure combined with fluoroscopy that is performed for multiple diagnostic and therapeutic indications. It carries a known risk of radiation exposure to patients and staff. We aimed to examine radiation administration techniques and to measure the radiation dose delivered by these techniques.\n \n \n \n This was a retrospective analysis of 437 ERCP procedures performed at a tertiary care hospital between April 2015 and April 2017.\n \n \n \n A total of 437 ERCP procedural charts were reviewed: fluoroscopy administration was endoscopist controlled (EC, n = 187, 42.79%) or technician controlled (TC, n = 250, 57.21%). The mean (and SD) fluoroscopy time (FT) was 2.107 ± 2.0 minutes. The mean (and SD) dose–area product (DAP) was 15,227.371 ± 16,784.738 Gy·cm2. The degree of ERCP difficulty was evaluated as recommended by the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, and graded 1–4. Level I TC procedures had a mean FT and DAP of 1.600 minutes and 12,644.72 Gy·cm2, respectively. The FT and DAP values for level I EC procedures were 1.514 minutes and 12,966.71 Gy·cm2, respectively, as compared with level IV TC procedures (mean FT, 2.539 minutes; mean DAP, 19,469.94 Gy·cm2) and level IV EC procedures (mean FT, 4.890 minutes; mean DAP, 37,921.00 Gy·cm2).\n \n \n \n DAP and FT are increased significantly in EC ERCP in American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 4 procedures. Comparison of the different degrees of difficulty indicated that there is a linear correlation between the degree of difficulty and both FT and DAP.\n","PeriodicalId":392717,"journal":{"name":"Innovations in Surgery and Interventional Medicine","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of Radiation Exposure During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) by Different Fluoroscope Techniques\",\"authors\":\"Saleh A. Alghsoon, Khaled Shaban, Altaf Khan, F. Almeshal., S. O. Balogun, M. Y. Memon, A. Swied\",\"doi\":\"10.36401/isim-20-02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a relatively new endoscopic procedure combined with fluoroscopy that is performed for multiple diagnostic and therapeutic indications. It carries a known risk of radiation exposure to patients and staff. We aimed to examine radiation administration techniques and to measure the radiation dose delivered by these techniques.\\n \\n \\n \\n This was a retrospective analysis of 437 ERCP procedures performed at a tertiary care hospital between April 2015 and April 2017.\\n \\n \\n \\n A total of 437 ERCP procedural charts were reviewed: fluoroscopy administration was endoscopist controlled (EC, n = 187, 42.79%) or technician controlled (TC, n = 250, 57.21%). The mean (and SD) fluoroscopy time (FT) was 2.107 ± 2.0 minutes. The mean (and SD) dose–area product (DAP) was 15,227.371 ± 16,784.738 Gy·cm2. The degree of ERCP difficulty was evaluated as recommended by the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, and graded 1–4. Level I TC procedures had a mean FT and DAP of 1.600 minutes and 12,644.72 Gy·cm2, respectively. The FT and DAP values for level I EC procedures were 1.514 minutes and 12,966.71 Gy·cm2, respectively, as compared with level IV TC procedures (mean FT, 2.539 minutes; mean DAP, 19,469.94 Gy·cm2) and level IV EC procedures (mean FT, 4.890 minutes; mean DAP, 37,921.00 Gy·cm2).\\n \\n \\n \\n DAP and FT are increased significantly in EC ERCP in American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 4 procedures. Comparison of the different degrees of difficulty indicated that there is a linear correlation between the degree of difficulty and both FT and DAP.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":392717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovations in Surgery and Interventional Medicine\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovations in Surgery and Interventional Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36401/isim-20-02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovations in Surgery and Interventional Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36401/isim-20-02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

内窥镜逆行胆管造影(ERCP)是一种相对较新的内窥镜检查与透视检查相结合的方法,可用于多种诊断和治疗适应症。它对病人和工作人员有辐射暴露的已知风险。我们的目的是研究辐射管理技术,并测量这些技术所产生的辐射剂量。这是对2015年4月至2017年4月期间在一家三级医院进行的437例ERCP手术的回顾性分析。共回顾了437张ERCP程序图:透视给药由内镜医师控制(EC, n = 187, 42.79%)或技师控制(TC, n = 250, 57.21%)。平均(和SD)透视时间(FT)为2.107±2.0分钟。平均(和SD)剂量面积积(DAP)为15,227.371±16,784.738 Gy·cm2。ERCP的困难程度按照美国胃肠内镜学会的建议进行评估,分为1-4级。一级TC手术的平均FT和DAP分别为1600分钟和12644.72 Gy·cm2。与IV级TC手术相比,I级EC手术的FT和DAP值分别为1.514分钟和12,966.71 Gy·cm2(平均FT为2.539分钟;平均DAP, 19,469.94 Gy·cm2)和IV级EC手术(平均FT, 4.890分钟;平均DAP为37,921.00 Gy·cm2)。美国胃肠内窥镜学会(American Society for胃肠内镜)手术中,EC ERCP患者DAP和FT明显升高。不同难易程度的比较表明,难易程度与FT和DAP均呈线性相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparison of Radiation Exposure During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) by Different Fluoroscope Techniques
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a relatively new endoscopic procedure combined with fluoroscopy that is performed for multiple diagnostic and therapeutic indications. It carries a known risk of radiation exposure to patients and staff. We aimed to examine radiation administration techniques and to measure the radiation dose delivered by these techniques. This was a retrospective analysis of 437 ERCP procedures performed at a tertiary care hospital between April 2015 and April 2017. A total of 437 ERCP procedural charts were reviewed: fluoroscopy administration was endoscopist controlled (EC, n = 187, 42.79%) or technician controlled (TC, n = 250, 57.21%). The mean (and SD) fluoroscopy time (FT) was 2.107 ± 2.0 minutes. The mean (and SD) dose–area product (DAP) was 15,227.371 ± 16,784.738 Gy·cm2. The degree of ERCP difficulty was evaluated as recommended by the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, and graded 1–4. Level I TC procedures had a mean FT and DAP of 1.600 minutes and 12,644.72 Gy·cm2, respectively. The FT and DAP values for level I EC procedures were 1.514 minutes and 12,966.71 Gy·cm2, respectively, as compared with level IV TC procedures (mean FT, 2.539 minutes; mean DAP, 19,469.94 Gy·cm2) and level IV EC procedures (mean FT, 4.890 minutes; mean DAP, 37,921.00 Gy·cm2). DAP and FT are increased significantly in EC ERCP in American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 4 procedures. Comparison of the different degrees of difficulty indicated that there is a linear correlation between the degree of difficulty and both FT and DAP.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信