炉的多变量控制:LQS与GMC

B. Surgenor, T. Hesketh
{"title":"炉的多变量控制:LQS与GMC","authors":"B. Surgenor, T. Hesketh","doi":"10.23919/ACC.1989.4790422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A simulation study of the multivariable control of an industrial furnace has been conducted. The performance of an optimal Linear Quadratic Servo (LQS) has been contrasted with that of a trajectory oriented Generic Model Controller (GMC). The design procedure for each controller is documented. The GMC design was found to provide superior decoupling. The LQS design provided more precise control over the final response characteristic. Both designs were found to be equally robust in the face of model coefficient errors and unmeasured disturbances.","PeriodicalId":383719,"journal":{"name":"1989 American Control Conference","volume":"51 349 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multivariable Control of a Furnace: LQS Versus GMC\",\"authors\":\"B. Surgenor, T. Hesketh\",\"doi\":\"10.23919/ACC.1989.4790422\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A simulation study of the multivariable control of an industrial furnace has been conducted. The performance of an optimal Linear Quadratic Servo (LQS) has been contrasted with that of a trajectory oriented Generic Model Controller (GMC). The design procedure for each controller is documented. The GMC design was found to provide superior decoupling. The LQS design provided more precise control over the final response characteristic. Both designs were found to be equally robust in the face of model coefficient errors and unmeasured disturbances.\",\"PeriodicalId\":383719,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"1989 American Control Conference\",\"volume\":\"51 349 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"1989 American Control Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23919/ACC.1989.4790422\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"1989 American Control Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/ACC.1989.4790422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

对某工业加热炉的多变量控制进行了仿真研究。比较了最优线性二次型伺服系统(LQS)与面向轨迹的通用模型控制器(GMC)的性能。每个控制器的设计程序都有文件。发现GMC设计提供了优越的解耦。LQS设计对最终响应特性提供了更精确的控制。两种设计在面对模型系数误差和未测量干扰时都具有同样的鲁棒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multivariable Control of a Furnace: LQS Versus GMC
A simulation study of the multivariable control of an industrial furnace has been conducted. The performance of an optimal Linear Quadratic Servo (LQS) has been contrasted with that of a trajectory oriented Generic Model Controller (GMC). The design procedure for each controller is documented. The GMC design was found to provide superior decoupling. The LQS design provided more precise control over the final response characteristic. Both designs were found to be equally robust in the face of model coefficient errors and unmeasured disturbances.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信