尼日利亚对抗性法律制度中的传闻证据及其不可采信原因

E. S. Olarinde, Udosen Jacob Idem
{"title":"尼日利亚对抗性法律制度中的传闻证据及其不可采信原因","authors":"E. S. Olarinde, Udosen Jacob Idem","doi":"10.53982/alj.2019.0701.01-j","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At common law and in Nigeria, hearsay evidence arises where a witness in his own testimony makes a statement, oral or written made by another person who experienced, heard and saw an incident happen in order to establish the truth asserted. Such testimony is generally inadmissible because the informant who witnessed the event is not in court to prove the truth of his statement under oath. This paper examines what is hearsay evidence and further seeks to discuss exceptions to the rule and highlights reasons for its inadmissibility. The finding of this article is that hearsay evidence is weak and untrustworthy to be relied upon by the court, the same not being a testimony of a person who witnessed the event. The paper recommends that the Evidence Act be amended to provide for the range of offences that section 37 of Evidence Act can cover apart from exceptions mentioned in Sections 38-45.","PeriodicalId":123596,"journal":{"name":"ABUAD Law Journal","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hearsay Evidence and Reasons for its Inadmissibility in the Nigerian Adversarial Legal System\",\"authors\":\"E. S. Olarinde, Udosen Jacob Idem\",\"doi\":\"10.53982/alj.2019.0701.01-j\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"At common law and in Nigeria, hearsay evidence arises where a witness in his own testimony makes a statement, oral or written made by another person who experienced, heard and saw an incident happen in order to establish the truth asserted. Such testimony is generally inadmissible because the informant who witnessed the event is not in court to prove the truth of his statement under oath. This paper examines what is hearsay evidence and further seeks to discuss exceptions to the rule and highlights reasons for its inadmissibility. The finding of this article is that hearsay evidence is weak and untrustworthy to be relied upon by the court, the same not being a testimony of a person who witnessed the event. The paper recommends that the Evidence Act be amended to provide for the range of offences that section 37 of Evidence Act can cover apart from exceptions mentioned in Sections 38-45.\",\"PeriodicalId\":123596,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ABUAD Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"80 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ABUAD Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53982/alj.2019.0701.01-j\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ABUAD Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53982/alj.2019.0701.01-j","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在普通法和尼日利亚,道听途说证据是指证人在自己的证词中引用另一个经历、听到和看到事件发生的人的口头或书面陈述,以确立所断言的真相。这样的证词通常是不可接受的,因为目击事件的举报人不在法庭上证明他宣誓后所说的话的真实性。本文探讨了什么是传闻证据,并进一步探讨了该规则的例外情况,并强调了其不可采信的原因。本文的结论是,道听途说证据是薄弱的,不可信的,不能作为法院的依据,同样不能作为目击事件的人的证词。本文建议对《证据法》进行修订,以规定《证据法》第37条可以涵盖的犯罪范围,除了第38-45条中提到的例外情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hearsay Evidence and Reasons for its Inadmissibility in the Nigerian Adversarial Legal System
At common law and in Nigeria, hearsay evidence arises where a witness in his own testimony makes a statement, oral or written made by another person who experienced, heard and saw an incident happen in order to establish the truth asserted. Such testimony is generally inadmissible because the informant who witnessed the event is not in court to prove the truth of his statement under oath. This paper examines what is hearsay evidence and further seeks to discuss exceptions to the rule and highlights reasons for its inadmissibility. The finding of this article is that hearsay evidence is weak and untrustworthy to be relied upon by the court, the same not being a testimony of a person who witnessed the event. The paper recommends that the Evidence Act be amended to provide for the range of offences that section 37 of Evidence Act can cover apart from exceptions mentioned in Sections 38-45.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信