基于MEREC的WASPAS方法选择笔记本电脑

Simge Yeni̇lmezel, Irfan Ertugrul
{"title":"基于MEREC的WASPAS方法选择笔记本电脑","authors":"Simge Yeni̇lmezel, Irfan Ertugrul","doi":"10.58308/bemarej.1207859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the development of technology, computers have become very important in both daily life and business life. Evaluation of many data together, error-free and fast calculation has been facilitated by computers. With the development of remote working and field work areas, laptop computers have become more preferred for companies. Today, there are many different brands of laptop. The presence of many criteria and alternatives makes selection difficult for decision makers. In this case, the use of multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods makes it easier for the decision maker to make the most beneficial choice. With MCDM methods, it is possible to select, sort and classify options with different features in the decision-making process. In this study, while making the most appropriate selection, priorities were determined with the MEREC (Method based on the Removal Effects of Criteria) method, which is one of the objective weighting methods, and the alternatives were listed with the WASPAS (Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment) method. As a result of the processes, the most important criterion was the battery life, which corresponds to the K7 among the seven criteria, while the best alternative among the seven alternatives was A2.","PeriodicalId":310891,"journal":{"name":"Business Economics and Management Research Journal","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Laptop selection with MEREC based WASPAS method\",\"authors\":\"Simge Yeni̇lmezel, Irfan Ertugrul\",\"doi\":\"10.58308/bemarej.1207859\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the development of technology, computers have become very important in both daily life and business life. Evaluation of many data together, error-free and fast calculation has been facilitated by computers. With the development of remote working and field work areas, laptop computers have become more preferred for companies. Today, there are many different brands of laptop. The presence of many criteria and alternatives makes selection difficult for decision makers. In this case, the use of multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods makes it easier for the decision maker to make the most beneficial choice. With MCDM methods, it is possible to select, sort and classify options with different features in the decision-making process. In this study, while making the most appropriate selection, priorities were determined with the MEREC (Method based on the Removal Effects of Criteria) method, which is one of the objective weighting methods, and the alternatives were listed with the WASPAS (Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment) method. As a result of the processes, the most important criterion was the battery life, which corresponds to the K7 among the seven criteria, while the best alternative among the seven alternatives was A2.\",\"PeriodicalId\":310891,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Business Economics and Management Research Journal\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Business Economics and Management Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.58308/bemarej.1207859\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Economics and Management Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58308/bemarej.1207859","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着科技的发展,计算机在日常生活和商业生活中都变得非常重要。计算机的出现使得对大量数据的综合评估、无差错和快速计算成为可能。随着远程工作和现场工作领域的发展,笔记本电脑已成为公司的首选。今天,有许多不同品牌的笔记本电脑。许多标准和备选方案的存在使得决策者很难进行选择。在这种情况下,多准则决策(MCDM)方法的使用使决策者更容易做出最有利的选择。利用MCDM方法,可以在决策过程中对具有不同特征的选项进行选择、排序和分类。本研究在进行最合适的选择的同时,采用客观加权法之一MEREC (Method based on Removal Effects of Criteria)确定优先级,采用WASPAS (Weighted aggregate Sum Product Assessment)列出备选方案。结果显示,最重要的标准是电池寿命,对应于7个标准中的K7,而7个备选方案中的最佳备选方案是A2。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Laptop selection with MEREC based WASPAS method
With the development of technology, computers have become very important in both daily life and business life. Evaluation of many data together, error-free and fast calculation has been facilitated by computers. With the development of remote working and field work areas, laptop computers have become more preferred for companies. Today, there are many different brands of laptop. The presence of many criteria and alternatives makes selection difficult for decision makers. In this case, the use of multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods makes it easier for the decision maker to make the most beneficial choice. With MCDM methods, it is possible to select, sort and classify options with different features in the decision-making process. In this study, while making the most appropriate selection, priorities were determined with the MEREC (Method based on the Removal Effects of Criteria) method, which is one of the objective weighting methods, and the alternatives were listed with the WASPAS (Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment) method. As a result of the processes, the most important criterion was the battery life, which corresponds to the K7 among the seven criteria, while the best alternative among the seven alternatives was A2.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信