不同参考采样方案下基于目标和像素的高分辨率图像分类比较

IEEA '18 Pub Date : 2018-03-28 DOI:10.1145/3208854.3208899
Dongyi Zhang, Mingli Wang, Y. Ke
{"title":"不同参考采样方案下基于目标和像素的高分辨率图像分类比较","authors":"Dongyi Zhang, Mingli Wang, Y. Ke","doi":"10.1145/3208854.3208899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, with the development of remote sensing techniques, image classification based on remote sensing imagery with high spatial resolution has played a significant role. At present, there are mainly two ways to classify the imagery of high resolution: pixel-based method and object-based method. Because of the wide differences of spectral features in pixel-based method, 'salt-and-pepper' effect appears in the classification result, which decreases the accuracy. And the object-based method which is widely used in image classification has a low accuracy of classification about objects with similar spectral features and shape features. Each of the two methods has its advantages and disadvantages. It is generally agreed that object-based classification has an advantage over pixel-based classification. However, the previous study found that the results of object-based classification was deeply influenced by reference sampling method So it is necessary to have a comparison between object and pixel-based method under different reference sampling schemes. In this study, we studied pixel-based method and object-based method, selected samples using 'select samples randomly' method and 'select samples separated by objects' method respectively, and built classification models using SVM and RF classifiers respectively. We compared different classification methods and analyzed the impacts of selection of samples and classifiers on classification results. The research showed that the accuracy of classification depends on the distribution of sample points. When sample points were selected randomly(Rand), object-based method got a higher accuracy; when sample points were selected by reference objects separately(Sep), pixel-based method got a higher accuracy.","PeriodicalId":365707,"journal":{"name":"IEEA '18","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Object- and Pixel-Based High Resolution Image Classification under Different Reference Sampling Schemes\",\"authors\":\"Dongyi Zhang, Mingli Wang, Y. Ke\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3208854.3208899\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent years, with the development of remote sensing techniques, image classification based on remote sensing imagery with high spatial resolution has played a significant role. At present, there are mainly two ways to classify the imagery of high resolution: pixel-based method and object-based method. Because of the wide differences of spectral features in pixel-based method, 'salt-and-pepper' effect appears in the classification result, which decreases the accuracy. And the object-based method which is widely used in image classification has a low accuracy of classification about objects with similar spectral features and shape features. Each of the two methods has its advantages and disadvantages. It is generally agreed that object-based classification has an advantage over pixel-based classification. However, the previous study found that the results of object-based classification was deeply influenced by reference sampling method So it is necessary to have a comparison between object and pixel-based method under different reference sampling schemes. In this study, we studied pixel-based method and object-based method, selected samples using 'select samples randomly' method and 'select samples separated by objects' method respectively, and built classification models using SVM and RF classifiers respectively. We compared different classification methods and analyzed the impacts of selection of samples and classifiers on classification results. The research showed that the accuracy of classification depends on the distribution of sample points. When sample points were selected randomly(Rand), object-based method got a higher accuracy; when sample points were selected by reference objects separately(Sep), pixel-based method got a higher accuracy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":365707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEA '18\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEA '18\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3208854.3208899\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEA '18","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3208854.3208899","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

近年来,随着遥感技术的发展,基于高空间分辨率遥感影像的图像分类发挥了重要作用。目前,对高分辨率图像进行分类的方法主要有两种:基于像素的方法和基于对象的方法。由于基于像素的分类方法的光谱特征差异较大,分类结果出现“椒盐效应”,降低了分类精度。而目前广泛应用于图像分类的基于目标的方法对于具有相似光谱特征和形状特征的目标的分类精度较低。这两种方法各有优缺点。人们普遍认为,基于对象的分类比基于像素的分类有优势。然而,以往的研究发现,基于对象的分类结果受参考采样方法的影响较大,因此有必要对不同参考采样方案下的基于对象和基于像素的分类方法进行比较。在本研究中,我们研究了基于像素的方法和基于对象的方法,分别采用“随机选择样本”和“按对象分离选择样本”的方法选择样本,并分别使用SVM和RF分类器构建分类模型。我们比较了不同的分类方法,分析了样本和分类器的选择对分类结果的影响。研究表明,分类的准确性取决于样本点的分布。当样本点随机选取(Rand)时,基于对象的方法准确率更高;当参考对象单独选取样本点(Sep)时,基于像素的方法具有更高的精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Object- and Pixel-Based High Resolution Image Classification under Different Reference Sampling Schemes
In recent years, with the development of remote sensing techniques, image classification based on remote sensing imagery with high spatial resolution has played a significant role. At present, there are mainly two ways to classify the imagery of high resolution: pixel-based method and object-based method. Because of the wide differences of spectral features in pixel-based method, 'salt-and-pepper' effect appears in the classification result, which decreases the accuracy. And the object-based method which is widely used in image classification has a low accuracy of classification about objects with similar spectral features and shape features. Each of the two methods has its advantages and disadvantages. It is generally agreed that object-based classification has an advantage over pixel-based classification. However, the previous study found that the results of object-based classification was deeply influenced by reference sampling method So it is necessary to have a comparison between object and pixel-based method under different reference sampling schemes. In this study, we studied pixel-based method and object-based method, selected samples using 'select samples randomly' method and 'select samples separated by objects' method respectively, and built classification models using SVM and RF classifiers respectively. We compared different classification methods and analyzed the impacts of selection of samples and classifiers on classification results. The research showed that the accuracy of classification depends on the distribution of sample points. When sample points were selected randomly(Rand), object-based method got a higher accuracy; when sample points were selected by reference objects separately(Sep), pixel-based method got a higher accuracy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信