脊髓型颈椎病的手术决策:前后入路的比较

D. Massel, V. Puvanesarajah, Benjamin C. Mayo, H. Hassanzadeh, S. Presciutti, F. Phillips
{"title":"脊髓型颈椎病的手术决策:前后入路的比较","authors":"D. Massel, V. Puvanesarajah, Benjamin C. Mayo, H. Hassanzadeh, S. Presciutti, F. Phillips","doi":"10.1097/01.CSS.0000489919.86936.57","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"available in the literature, it is estimated that 1.6 of every 100,000 individuals are surgically treated for this condition.4 This statistic suggests that the number of individuals who experience CSM is much higher. Preferred initial treatment for CSM includes nonoperative modalities such as physical therapy; anti-inflammatory medications; and in some cases, a cervical collar. However, refractory cases may require surgical intervention. Current literature has demonstrated surgical decompression of the cervical spine to improve functional outcomes in patients with CSM.5,6 Decompression can be achieved via an anterior or a posterior approach; each method of decompression has its own advantages and disadvantages. To our knowledge, there are no published randomized controlled clinical studies that compare the two approaches directly, which prevents clear conclusions from being drawn. Therefore, this review aims to summarize the current literature regarding anterior and posterior approaches for the treatment of CSM, with specific emphasis on comparing treatment safety and efficacy.","PeriodicalId":209002,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Spine Surgery","volume":"117 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical Decision Making in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Comparison of Anterior and Posterior Approach\",\"authors\":\"D. Massel, V. Puvanesarajah, Benjamin C. Mayo, H. Hassanzadeh, S. Presciutti, F. Phillips\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/01.CSS.0000489919.86936.57\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"available in the literature, it is estimated that 1.6 of every 100,000 individuals are surgically treated for this condition.4 This statistic suggests that the number of individuals who experience CSM is much higher. Preferred initial treatment for CSM includes nonoperative modalities such as physical therapy; anti-inflammatory medications; and in some cases, a cervical collar. However, refractory cases may require surgical intervention. Current literature has demonstrated surgical decompression of the cervical spine to improve functional outcomes in patients with CSM.5,6 Decompression can be achieved via an anterior or a posterior approach; each method of decompression has its own advantages and disadvantages. To our knowledge, there are no published randomized controlled clinical studies that compare the two approaches directly, which prevents clear conclusions from being drawn. Therefore, this review aims to summarize the current literature regarding anterior and posterior approaches for the treatment of CSM, with specific emphasis on comparing treatment safety and efficacy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":209002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary Spine Surgery\",\"volume\":\"117 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary Spine Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CSS.0000489919.86936.57\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CSS.0000489919.86936.57","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

根据文献,估计每10万人中就有1.6人接受手术治疗这一统计数据表明,经历CSM的个人数量要高得多。CSM的首选初始治疗包括非手术方式,如物理治疗;抗炎药物;在某些情况下,还有颈圈。然而,难治性病例可能需要手术干预。目前的文献表明,颈椎手术减压可改善脊髓型颈椎病患者的功能预后5,6减压可通过前路或后路实现;每种减压方法都有自己的优点和缺点。据我们所知,目前还没有发表的随机对照临床研究直接比较这两种方法,因此无法得出明确的结论。因此,本综述旨在总结目前关于前路和后路治疗脊髓型颈椎病的文献,并特别强调比较治疗的安全性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surgical Decision Making in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Comparison of Anterior and Posterior Approach
available in the literature, it is estimated that 1.6 of every 100,000 individuals are surgically treated for this condition.4 This statistic suggests that the number of individuals who experience CSM is much higher. Preferred initial treatment for CSM includes nonoperative modalities such as physical therapy; anti-inflammatory medications; and in some cases, a cervical collar. However, refractory cases may require surgical intervention. Current literature has demonstrated surgical decompression of the cervical spine to improve functional outcomes in patients with CSM.5,6 Decompression can be achieved via an anterior or a posterior approach; each method of decompression has its own advantages and disadvantages. To our knowledge, there are no published randomized controlled clinical studies that compare the two approaches directly, which prevents clear conclusions from being drawn. Therefore, this review aims to summarize the current literature regarding anterior and posterior approaches for the treatment of CSM, with specific emphasis on comparing treatment safety and efficacy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信