危地马拉东南部的树木覆盖对补偿牛奶农场温室气体排放的贡献

Cristóbal Villanueva, Carlos Moscoso, G. Detlefsen, J. Solis, Julio López
{"title":"危地马拉东南部的树木覆盖对补偿牛奶农场温室气体排放的贡献","authors":"Cristóbal Villanueva, Carlos Moscoso, G. Detlefsen, J. Solis, Julio López","doi":"10.53588/alpa.310105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Livestock activity contributes 6% of Guatemala's total GHG emissions (MARN, 2021), due among other aspects, to the predominance of traditional production systems. The objective of this study was to identify the main sources of GHG emissions and to determine the carbon balance in milk-producing farms in the southeastern region of Guatemala, where 30 farms with different levels of technological innovation were selected and where biophysical and socioeconomic information was collected to estimate GHG emissions using IPCC equations (IPCC, 2006). Carbon sequestration was estimated through the monitoring of temporary plots in different land uses. The data were analysed using descriptive statistics and with a T-test for the comparison of high and low innovation systems. The main source of emission on the farms was enteric fermentation, followed by fertilization, fuels, manure and energy. In farms with low innovation the emission by enteric fermentation was higher (p=0.05) and in those with high innovation was fertilization. The intensity of emissions per unit of milk produced was lower in farms with high innovation, while for meat production they were those with low innovation. In both cases this was explained by higher productivity. Likewise, the 53% of the farms presented a positive carbon balance with an important contribution in the compensation of forests and scattered trees in paddocks. In farms with low innovation the contribution was 51 and 30% and in high innovation 48 and 26%, respectively. In dairy farms, the main source of emission was enteric fermentation. In addition, those with better management of tree cover (forests and silvopastoral systems) presented a positive carbon balance.","PeriodicalId":223379,"journal":{"name":"Archivos Latinoamericanos de Producción Animal","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contribución de la cobertura arbórea a la compensación de las emisiones de gases de efecto invernadero de fincas productoras de leche en el sur oriente de Guatemala\",\"authors\":\"Cristóbal Villanueva, Carlos Moscoso, G. Detlefsen, J. Solis, Julio López\",\"doi\":\"10.53588/alpa.310105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Livestock activity contributes 6% of Guatemala's total GHG emissions (MARN, 2021), due among other aspects, to the predominance of traditional production systems. The objective of this study was to identify the main sources of GHG emissions and to determine the carbon balance in milk-producing farms in the southeastern region of Guatemala, where 30 farms with different levels of technological innovation were selected and where biophysical and socioeconomic information was collected to estimate GHG emissions using IPCC equations (IPCC, 2006). Carbon sequestration was estimated through the monitoring of temporary plots in different land uses. The data were analysed using descriptive statistics and with a T-test for the comparison of high and low innovation systems. The main source of emission on the farms was enteric fermentation, followed by fertilization, fuels, manure and energy. In farms with low innovation the emission by enteric fermentation was higher (p=0.05) and in those with high innovation was fertilization. The intensity of emissions per unit of milk produced was lower in farms with high innovation, while for meat production they were those with low innovation. In both cases this was explained by higher productivity. Likewise, the 53% of the farms presented a positive carbon balance with an important contribution in the compensation of forests and scattered trees in paddocks. In farms with low innovation the contribution was 51 and 30% and in high innovation 48 and 26%, respectively. In dairy farms, the main source of emission was enteric fermentation. In addition, those with better management of tree cover (forests and silvopastoral systems) presented a positive carbon balance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":223379,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archivos Latinoamericanos de Producción Animal\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archivos Latinoamericanos de Producción Animal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53588/alpa.310105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos Latinoamericanos de Producción Animal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53588/alpa.310105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

畜牧业活动占危地马拉温室气体排放总量的6% (MARN, 2021年),原因之一是传统生产系统占主导地位。本研究的目的是确定温室气体排放的主要来源,并确定危地马拉东南部地区奶牛场的碳平衡,其中选择了30个技术创新水平不同的奶牛场,并收集了生物物理和社会经济信息,利用IPCC方程估计温室气体排放量(IPCC, 2006)。通过监测不同土地用途的临时地块,估算了碳固存。对数据进行了描述性统计分析,并对高创新系统和低创新系统进行了t检验。农场的主要排放源是肠道发酵,其次是施肥、燃料、粪肥和能源。创新程度低的养殖场肠道发酵排放较高(p=0.05),创新程度高的养殖场为施肥排放。创新程度高的农场生产的每单位牛奶的排放强度较低,而在肉类生产方面,创新程度低的农场排放强度较低。在这两种情况下,这都可以用更高的生产率来解释。同样,53%的农场呈现出正碳平衡,在补偿森林和围场中分散的树木方面做出了重要贡献。在创新程度低的农场,贡献分别为51%和30%,在创新程度高的农场,贡献分别为48%和26%。在奶牛场,主要的排放源是肠道发酵。此外,那些树木覆盖管理较好的地区(森林和银圈系统)呈现出正的碳平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Contribución de la cobertura arbórea a la compensación de las emisiones de gases de efecto invernadero de fincas productoras de leche en el sur oriente de Guatemala
Livestock activity contributes 6% of Guatemala's total GHG emissions (MARN, 2021), due among other aspects, to the predominance of traditional production systems. The objective of this study was to identify the main sources of GHG emissions and to determine the carbon balance in milk-producing farms in the southeastern region of Guatemala, where 30 farms with different levels of technological innovation were selected and where biophysical and socioeconomic information was collected to estimate GHG emissions using IPCC equations (IPCC, 2006). Carbon sequestration was estimated through the monitoring of temporary plots in different land uses. The data were analysed using descriptive statistics and with a T-test for the comparison of high and low innovation systems. The main source of emission on the farms was enteric fermentation, followed by fertilization, fuels, manure and energy. In farms with low innovation the emission by enteric fermentation was higher (p=0.05) and in those with high innovation was fertilization. The intensity of emissions per unit of milk produced was lower in farms with high innovation, while for meat production they were those with low innovation. In both cases this was explained by higher productivity. Likewise, the 53% of the farms presented a positive carbon balance with an important contribution in the compensation of forests and scattered trees in paddocks. In farms with low innovation the contribution was 51 and 30% and in high innovation 48 and 26%, respectively. In dairy farms, the main source of emission was enteric fermentation. In addition, those with better management of tree cover (forests and silvopastoral systems) presented a positive carbon balance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信