E. Basiouny, ahmed abdakaway, Mohsen S. Asker, Medhat Mostafa Abozid
{"title":"三种精油化学成分及抗氧化活性之比较研究","authors":"E. Basiouny, ahmed abdakaway, Mohsen S. Asker, Medhat Mostafa Abozid","doi":"10.21608/mjab.2023.212610.1008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": The problem of oxidation and free radicals is one of the factors that are very dangerous to human health, which requires searching for safe natural compounds to be included in the diet and work to combat free radicals. The aim of this study was to evaluate the antioxidant effect of essential oils of basil, thyme and lemongrass by two different methods (FRAP and DPPH) as well as to identify the active ingredients of each oil by GCMS. The results of the fractionation on the GCMS showed that the main components of the essential oils were as follows: basil (L-linalool 59.02% and 1,8-cineole 9.52%), thyme (Thymol 48.06%and p-cymene 38.57%), and lemongrass (Geranial 47.59% and neral 36.27%). In the FRAP method, essential oil of basil was the strongest as an antioxidant (2.35± 0.61 mMol Fe +2 /g), followed by essential oil of thyme (1.96± 0.42 mMol Fe +2 /g), followed by essential oil of lemongrass by a large margin (0.93± 0.21 mMol Fe +2 /g). Whereas, when studying the antioxidant activity by the DPPH method, the results showed through comparison with IC 50 values that, basil essential oil was the strongest antioxidant (IC 50 =144.78 ± 7.19 μg/ml), followed by lemongrass essential oil (IC 50 =170.05 ± 6.97 μg/ml) and finally thyme essential oil (IC 50 =183.45 ± 7.19 μg/ml), w ith a slight difference. The results clearly indicated that the essential oil of basil was the best as an antioxidant compared to the essential oils of lemongrass and thyme in both methods used for the determination of antioxidant activity in vitro (FRAP and DPPH); this makes it a promising source of natural antioxidants that can be used in diets.","PeriodicalId":280782,"journal":{"name":"Menoufia Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN THREE ESSENTIAL OILS IN TERMS OF THEIR CHEMICAL COMPOSITION AND ANTIOXIDANT ACTIVITY\",\"authors\":\"E. Basiouny, ahmed abdakaway, Mohsen S. Asker, Medhat Mostafa Abozid\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/mjab.2023.212610.1008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": The problem of oxidation and free radicals is one of the factors that are very dangerous to human health, which requires searching for safe natural compounds to be included in the diet and work to combat free radicals. The aim of this study was to evaluate the antioxidant effect of essential oils of basil, thyme and lemongrass by two different methods (FRAP and DPPH) as well as to identify the active ingredients of each oil by GCMS. The results of the fractionation on the GCMS showed that the main components of the essential oils were as follows: basil (L-linalool 59.02% and 1,8-cineole 9.52%), thyme (Thymol 48.06%and p-cymene 38.57%), and lemongrass (Geranial 47.59% and neral 36.27%). In the FRAP method, essential oil of basil was the strongest as an antioxidant (2.35± 0.61 mMol Fe +2 /g), followed by essential oil of thyme (1.96± 0.42 mMol Fe +2 /g), followed by essential oil of lemongrass by a large margin (0.93± 0.21 mMol Fe +2 /g). Whereas, when studying the antioxidant activity by the DPPH method, the results showed through comparison with IC 50 values that, basil essential oil was the strongest antioxidant (IC 50 =144.78 ± 7.19 μg/ml), followed by lemongrass essential oil (IC 50 =170.05 ± 6.97 μg/ml) and finally thyme essential oil (IC 50 =183.45 ± 7.19 μg/ml), w ith a slight difference. The results clearly indicated that the essential oil of basil was the best as an antioxidant compared to the essential oils of lemongrass and thyme in both methods used for the determination of antioxidant activity in vitro (FRAP and DPPH); this makes it a promising source of natural antioxidants that can be used in diets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":280782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Menoufia Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Menoufia Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/mjab.2023.212610.1008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Menoufia Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/mjab.2023.212610.1008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
当前位置氧化和自由基的问题是对人体健康非常危险的因素之一,这就需要在饮食中寻找安全的天然化合物,并努力对抗自由基。采用FRAP和DPPH两种不同的方法对罗勒、百里香和柠檬草精油的抗氧化作用进行了评价,并采用气相色谱法对各精油的有效成分进行了鉴定。gc - cms分离结果表明,精油的主要成分为罗勒(l -芳樟醇59.02%,1,8-桉叶油脑9.52%)、百里香(百里酚48.06%,对伞花香38.57%)和香茅(香樟47.59%,缬草36.27%)。在FRAP法中,罗勒精油的抗氧化作用最强(2.35±0.61 mMol Fe +2 /g),其次是百里香精油(1.96±0.42 mMol Fe +2 /g),其次是柠檬草精油(0.93±0.21 mMol Fe +2 /g)。而DPPH法研究其抗氧化活性时,通过与IC 50值的比较结果表明,罗勒精油的抗氧化能力最强(IC 50 =144.78±7.19 μg/ml),其次是柠檬草精油(IC 50 =170.05±6.97 μg/ml),最后是百里香精油(IC 50 =183.45±7.19 μg/ml),两者差异较小。结果表明,在体外抗氧化活性测定(FRAP和DPPH)两种方法中,罗勒精油的抗氧化作用均优于柠檬草精油和百里香精油;这使得它成为一种很有希望的天然抗氧化剂来源,可以在饮食中使用。
A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN THREE ESSENTIAL OILS IN TERMS OF THEIR CHEMICAL COMPOSITION AND ANTIOXIDANT ACTIVITY
: The problem of oxidation and free radicals is one of the factors that are very dangerous to human health, which requires searching for safe natural compounds to be included in the diet and work to combat free radicals. The aim of this study was to evaluate the antioxidant effect of essential oils of basil, thyme and lemongrass by two different methods (FRAP and DPPH) as well as to identify the active ingredients of each oil by GCMS. The results of the fractionation on the GCMS showed that the main components of the essential oils were as follows: basil (L-linalool 59.02% and 1,8-cineole 9.52%), thyme (Thymol 48.06%and p-cymene 38.57%), and lemongrass (Geranial 47.59% and neral 36.27%). In the FRAP method, essential oil of basil was the strongest as an antioxidant (2.35± 0.61 mMol Fe +2 /g), followed by essential oil of thyme (1.96± 0.42 mMol Fe +2 /g), followed by essential oil of lemongrass by a large margin (0.93± 0.21 mMol Fe +2 /g). Whereas, when studying the antioxidant activity by the DPPH method, the results showed through comparison with IC 50 values that, basil essential oil was the strongest antioxidant (IC 50 =144.78 ± 7.19 μg/ml), followed by lemongrass essential oil (IC 50 =170.05 ± 6.97 μg/ml) and finally thyme essential oil (IC 50 =183.45 ± 7.19 μg/ml), w ith a slight difference. The results clearly indicated that the essential oil of basil was the best as an antioxidant compared to the essential oils of lemongrass and thyme in both methods used for the determination of antioxidant activity in vitro (FRAP and DPPH); this makes it a promising source of natural antioxidants that can be used in diets.